Republican vs Democrat

[guitarjosh]

LOL No not really.

Yes, it is. LOL Same old crybaby Josh crap.

So the market was controlling rates or was Volker? You can't have it both ways. LOL

Must you copy everything I do? LOL They are called Zombie corporations.

Now private ownership is fascism. LOL That sounds like standard corruption that happens in all systems. Jesus Christ! what an idiot.

I said free land free labor and expanding market. But whatever its still your opinion.

You make shit up as you go along. LOL

You're the one contradicting yourself I'm just pointing it out. LOL

LOL WOW what a burn, you must be a riot at the Yacht Club Biff. LOL

Was the Constitution amended to get rid of due process? NO If it was then I would be defending Trump.

If you can amend the Constitution, then nothing in it is absolute. Dumbass.

Yes really. If you’re saying others who make money in the stock market are living off the work of others, and you own stock, you’re a hypocritical bitch.

No it isn’t, Jerome Powell isn’t a banker, he’s a lawyer.

The market should control rates, but Volker did raise them to help drop inflation.

I don’t want to copy anything a hypocritical bitch loser like you does! LOL! Name some zombie corporations. You probably just heard Cenk or Sam use the term, and now you want to sound smart.

I didn’t say private ownership is fascism, it is allowed in fascism, like you’re saying there is in democratic socialism. The problem is that it was so regulated it was extremely difficult to open a business, like what will happen if you had your way. Joseph Smith, what a stupid hypocritical bitch!

Which they had in Brazil and they were poorer. You also said imperialism, which America had little of, and it was mainly after the Spanish-American War. Our colonies were tiny compared to empires of European countries, yet we were significantly wealthier, and the average American had a much higher standard of living than the average European.

No, I respond to your nonsensical rants you hear from Kyle and Thom.

Specifically where? I don’t contradict myself at all, you’re the one who hates colonization and imperialism but loves socialism, which is colonization and imperialism when it doesn’t cross boarders.

I've never been, but you worked around that stuff. Is the reason you hate rich people so much because they made you fight the homeless guys living by the docks for quarters?

No, but it’s your side that started the no Constitutional rights are absolute crap to erode our rights. They weren’t saying the Constitution is amendable, they’re saying your rights don’t apply in certain cases and the government can do anything. Welcome to the world you wanted me to live in, hypocritical bitch! LOL

[khicks26]

https://www.facebook.com/reel/608266685367255

Yea we know you love Sambo Sowell. LMAO

Here, watch a real black historian.

[khicks26]

There’s no shortage of things you give me to laugh at, it’s just your insistence that if you make money in stocks, you’re living off the backs of workers as you do the same thing just shows what a hypocritical bitch you are. You want Social Security too, right? That’s even more money from workers to you, hypocritical bitch! LOL.

The Fed isn’t run by bankers at all, Jerome Powell is not a banker. You’re just lying again. All you want to do is make the groups you love better off at the expense of the groups you hate, which is why you want to end capitalism.

It must be, you’re the expert on making things up. Volker did raise rates, and Reagan did put in free market reforms which stabilized the economy for decades. Nixon was a disaster, and those price controls led to rationing and shortages. The market always wins.

Name names, which companies can’t support themselves at all? Be specific.

Ownership is private hands in fascism too, hypocritical bitch. I’m not 12, but you have the economic understanding of a 5-year-old. India had private ownership, and the License Raj, which made it very difficult to open a business unless you knew the right people or could afford to grease the right palms. That’s exactly what democratic socialism brings.

No, that’s what happened, which is why every claim you made about what made America rich, I can point to other countries that had more but less wealth. Even slavery in America proves you wrong. You do realize most slaves were in the South, right? If slavery made regions wealthy, the South would have been wealthier than the North, but that wasn’t the case, because slavery doesn’t make a place as a whole wealthier.

Go back and explain where I got the history of Brazil wrong. Oh, that’s right, you don’t know or care.

Yep, the man who has facts and logic, and the hypocritical bitch that is the stupidest man alive. LOL

Fun as hell, another Freudian slip. Hell = torment, stupid hypocritical bitch, LOL.

So you're defending Trump here? No due process and you're saying it's okay because that's what the Founders wanted?

Where did the Founders say no Constitutional rights are absolute? Amending the Constitution and ignoring the Constitution aren’t the same thing, hypocritical bitch.



Um, no Constitutional rights being absolute means there are times when Constitutional rights are ignored. Your party was the party that preached that, and now they’re seeing it in action.

LOL No not really.

Yes, it is. LOL Same old crybaby Josh crap.

So the market was controlling rates or was Volker? You can't have it both ways. LOL

Must you copy everything I do? LOL They are called Zombie corporations.

Now private ownership is fascism. LOL That sounds like standard corruption that happens in all systems. Jesus Christ! what an idiot.

I said free land free labor and expanding market. But whatever its still your opinion.

You make shit up as you go along. LOL

You're the one contradicting yourself I'm just pointing it out. LOL

LOL WOW what a burn, you must be a riot at the Yacht Club Biff. LOL

Was the Constitution amended to get rid of due process? NO If it was then I would be defending Trump.

If you can amend the Constitution, then nothing in it is absolute. Dumbass.

[DwightShrute]

treason?

https://www.facebook.com/reel/4078826629015277

[guitarjosh]

LOL Really that's what your going with, what a weak ass bitch. You should stick to correcting my spelling.

LMAO, The Fed is the banks and run by bankers. Dam communist banks. LOL I don't know how you did it, but you made it even more pointless. LMAO

LMAO, must be nice to just make up your own history. Volker raised interest rates, what happen to the free market? At least Nixon had the balls to do a price freeze for inflation.

Read, read your own post. Zombie corporations.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that democratic socialism has capitalism. Ownership is still in private hands. Just shows you have no idea what your talking about. It's a little more than socialism bad, capitalism good. What are you 12 years old?

Yeah that's not an explanation. That's just what you believe. LMAO

This post sure isn't helping you. LMAO

Says the man that just wrote this post. LMAO

Please keep going this is fun as hell.

There’s no shortage of things you give me to laugh at, it’s just your insistence that if you make money in stocks, you’re living off the backs of workers as you do the same thing just shows what a hypocritical bitch you are. You want Social Security too, right? That’s even more money from workers to you, hypocritical bitch! LOL.

The Fed isn’t run by bankers at all, Jerome Powell is not a banker. You’re just lying again. All you want to do is make the groups you love better off at the expense of the groups you hate, which is why you want to end capitalism.

It must be, you’re the expert on making things up. Volker did raise rates, and Reagan did put in free market reforms which stabilized the economy for decades. Nixon was a disaster, and those price controls led to rationing and shortages. The market always wins.

Name names, which companies can’t support themselves at all? Be specific.

Ownership is private hands in fascism too, hypocritical bitch. I’m not 12, but you have the economic understanding of a 5-year-old. India had private ownership, and the License Raj, which made it very difficult to open a business unless you knew the right people or could afford to grease the right palms. That’s exactly what democratic socialism brings.

No, that’s what happened, which is why every claim you made about what made America rich, I can point to other countries that had more but less wealth. Even slavery in America proves you wrong. You do realize most slaves were in the South, right? If slavery made regions wealthy, the South would have been wealthier than the North, but that wasn’t the case, because slavery doesn’t make a place as a whole wealthier.

Go back and explain where I got the history of Brazil wrong. Oh, that’s right, you don’t know or care.

Yep, the man who has facts and logic, and the hypocritical bitch that is the stupidest man alive. LOL

Fun as hell, another Freudian slip. Hell = torment, stupid hypocritical bitch, LOL.

LOL. more Josh history.

The founders said it. That's why you can amend the constitution.

So you're defending Trump here? No due process and you're saying it's okay because that's what the Founders wanted?

Where did the Founders say no Constitutional rights are absolute? Amending the Constitution and ignoring the Constitution aren’t the same thing, hypocritical bitch.

how do you come to that conclusion in the context of this issue?

Um, no Constitutional rights being absolute means there are times when Constitutional rights are ignored. Your party was the party that preached that, and now they’re seeing it in action.

[Hareeba!]

LOL

[DwightShrute]

Yeah, that's why he became Uncle Thomas Sowell.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/608266685367255

[khicks26]

"The real motives of liberals have nothing to do with the welfare of other people.
Instead, they have two related goals--
to establish themselves as morally and intellectually superior to the rather distasteful population of common people,
and to gather as much power as possible to tell those distasteful common people how they must live their lives."
Thomas Sowell

Yeah, that's why he became Uncle Thomas Sowell.

[khicks26]

China steps on Trumps dick. LOL

[19th Hole]

"The real motives of liberals have nothing to do with the welfare of other people.
Instead, they have two related goals--
to establish themselves as morally and intellectually superior to the rather distasteful population of common people,
and to gather as much power as possible to tell those distasteful common people how they must live their lives."
Thomas Sowell

[Hareeba!]

Tweet of the day!

[Hareeba!]

It's your party that says no Constitutional rights are absolute. No Due process is one of the way that manifests.

how do you come to that conclusion in the context of this issue?

[khicks26]

It's your party that says no Constitutional rights are absolute. No Due process is one of the way that manifests.

LOL. more Josh history.

The founders said it. That's why you can amend the constitution.

[khicks26]

You live off the backs of workers! Tell your employer you no longer want to put money into your 401k and sell all the stock in your 401k. Until then, you’re a gigantic hypocrite.

2008 wouldn’t have been anywhere near as bad if we didn’t have the Fed dropping rates to 1%. The market should set rates, not the Fed. The Fed also should have been the ones to bail out the banks, since that’s what they’re there for. 2020 was due to a communist country, probably had a leak out of their lab. Capitalism had nothing to do with that. History couldn’t be clearer, when you have a lot of private property rights and individual freedom, you have a lot of average people with relatively high standards of living.

We had the S&L problem during Reagan, but that was due to over regulation, not under regulation, and the high inflation, which Reagan and Volker beat.

Show me and show me. Which companies can’t support themselves? If they can’t, they should go out of business. People that can have the ability to support themselves should be taught how to.

Not at all, you said India was poor because it was a British colony. Many countries, like America, were British colonies and are doing great, so it’s not that being a British colony is the problem. India’s problem is that they embraced democratic socialism instead of capitalism.

No it’s not, you keep telling me one reason after another why America got so rich compared to other countries, and I keep pointing out that other countries had more of that than we had, so why were they so poor? The reason why is because capitalism is what made us so rich.

I know and understand history, you don’t know or understand it.

It was funny, but people aren’t laughing with you, we’re laughing at you because what you write is so stupidly wrong.

LOL Really that's what your going with, what a weak ass bitch. You should stick to correcting my spelling.

LMAO, The Fed is the banks and run by bankers. Dam communist banks. LOL I don't know how you did it, but you made it even more pointless. LMAO

LMAO, must be nice to just make up your own history. Volker raised interest rates, what happen to the free market? At least Nixon had the balls to do a price freeze for inflation.

Read, read your own post. Zombie corporations.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that democratic socialism has capitalism. Ownership is still in private hands. Just shows you have no idea what your talking about. It's a little more than socialism bad, capitalism good. What are you 12 years old?

Yeah that's not an explanation. That's just what you believe. LMAO

This post sure isn't helping you. LMAO

Says the man that just wrote this post. LMAO

Please keep going this is fun as hell.

[guitarjosh]

He is promising to send Americans to foreign death camps.

This amounts to capital punishment without due process being offered.

It's your party that says no Constitutional rights are absolute. No Due process is one of the way that manifests.

[guitarjosh]

LOL you do live off the backs of workers. I didn't create the system I just live in it and doesn't mean I agree with it.

Yea we had a lot of capitalism in 2008 and 2020. History also shows the opposite. Still pointless.

Reagan was for socialism for the rich. That's why the government had to come in and bail out the banks while all the clown's got bonuses for ruining the economy. Capitalism is for the poor people.

Yes you did, and yes you did. We also have a lot of corporations that are over leveraged which can't support themselves.

More false equivalence. Of course it's Josh.

Your framing is BS and so is the false equivalence. All your conclusions are the same black and white BS. You're a small mind hack.

I said you know history, understanding it is a different thing. You understand none of it because YOUR a small mind hack.

It was funny, just because your shit isn't funny that's YOUR fault.

You live off the backs of workers! Tell your employer you no longer want to put money into your 401k and sell all the stock in your 401k. Until then, you’re a gigantic hypocrite.

2008 wouldn’t have been anywhere near as bad if we didn’t have the Fed dropping rates to 1%. The market should set rates, not the Fed. The Fed also should have been the ones to bail out the banks, since that’s what they’re there for. 2020 was due to a communist country, probably had a leak out of their lab. Capitalism had nothing to do with that. History couldn’t be clearer, when you have a lot of private property rights and individual freedom, you have a lot of average people with relatively high standards of living.

We had the S&L problem during Reagan, but that was due to over regulation, not under regulation, and the high inflation, which Reagan and Volker beat.

Show me and show me. Which companies can’t support themselves? If they can’t, they should go out of business. People that can have the ability to support themselves should be taught how to.

Not at all, you said India was poor because it was a British colony. Many countries, like America, were British colonies and are doing great, so it’s not that being a British colony is the problem. India’s problem is that they embraced democratic socialism instead of capitalism.

No it’s not, you keep telling me one reason after another why America got so rich compared to other countries, and I keep pointing out that other countries had more of that than we had, so why were they so poor? The reason why is because capitalism is what made us so rich.

I know and understand history, you don’t know or understand it.

It was funny, but people aren’t laughing with you, we’re laughing at you because what you write is so stupidly wrong.

[Hareeba!]

From the pulpit, Reverend Billiance Chondwe counts the empty seats.

"We are close to 300 [worshipers] but nowadays we are only less than 150. People are sick at home," says Chondwe — or Pastor Billy as everyone calls him — as he greeted congregants on a Sunday in early April at the entrance to his church, the Somone Community Centre, a branch of the Pentecostal Holiness Church in Zambia.

People are falling ill because the U.S.-funded clinics where they got their HIV medications and care have suddenly been shuttered. The staff is gone. The electricity has been shut off. Some patients have already run out of their daily pills that keep HIV at bay — and they have started to feel the physical consequences of the virus surging back.

The Trump Administration, in January, abruptly halted the vast majority of U.S. foreign assistance in light of their America First agenda. Officials said that lifesaving aid — such as HIV medications — would continue to flow. But the reality on the ground shows otherwise. An untold number of people with HIV have simply and suddenly lost access to their medication.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goats-and-soda/2025/04/14/g-s1-59863/hiv-aids-drugs-usaid-zambia

[Hareeba!]

He is promising to send Americans to foreign death camps.

This amounts to capital punishment without due process being offered.

[Optional]

Feel free to use the search function on my so called mention now that it’s working . Hint , don’t waste your time.

As for the foreign media . What might the American people do as far as stopping Trump from going too much further ?



As per the CNN article one more time .

What’s shocking to Harry Enten isn’t shocking to those living outside the media echo chamber.

Americans aren’t buying the anti-Trump narrative

The American people are the bosses. If you say enough loud enough you have the power to do more than many people think.

I think there are already strong signs he is steadying the ship. Whatever either of us think the reasons are for that is less important than it's happening.

[khicks26]

The country is already falling apart, which is why Bernie, AOC, you are constantly complaining about America and wanting a socialist revolution. You do have a choice, you don’t have to have a 401k if you don’t want to. So you’re just admitting to being a huge hypocrite. You constantly attack me for being savvy in the stock market, saying I’m living off the backs of workers, as you own stocks so you can retire better! LOLLOL!

What causes the average person to have a rapid increase in their standard of living is the whole point! History and empirical evidence shows that the more free market capitalism we have, the better the average person is.

You go after Reagan because he set back the socialists by decades. Again, he put in reforms that stabilized the economy, we’ve only had 4 recessions start since 1981 compared to 7 from 1953-1981. 2008 wasn’t the fault of Reagan, it was caused by the widespread belief that housing would perpetually rise. Have you ever seen The Big Short? There’s a scene about 25 minutes into the movie where Michael calls Lawrence to tell him about the position he took shorting the housing market and how he has to pay out premiums. Lawrence said, “You mean to tell me we pay premiums until the mortgages fail? In other words, we lose millions until something that never happened before happens?” That was the conventional wisdom leading up to 2008, that the housing market was free money, and people positioned themselves accordingly. When housing tanked, they got hammered.

I never said labor doesn’t create wealth. In this day and age though, labor needs wealth to get the tools and equipment needed to work. I didn’t say that about the culture war either, you’re just lying again. I said that if the democrats didn’t have a large supply of people who can’t support themselves needing transfer payments and promises of guaranteed jobs that pay a living wage regardless of your skill level, all they would have is unpopular culture war positions and they would get little support.

That’s a brilliant point about India being a British colony. Luckily for us Americans, we were never a colony of the British. Neither was Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Hong Kong… What hurt India was their following a socialist economist named Harold Laski. If you think it was bad now, look up The Emergency in India under democratic socialist Indira Gandhi. It’s exactly what people like you want for anyone who gets in your way.

It might be, but it’s still smarter than anything you’ve ever said. Tell me why it’s so stupid. If colonization and imperialism made a nation wealthy, Russia should be wealthier than the USA. You just keep grasping at straws. Literally everything you claimed made America wealthy, I’ve been able to point to a country that had more of it, yet they had less wealth. Once you point to capitalism, you’ll be right

Right to me means small government that isn’t too involved in my life. Again, if you’re going to call someone an idiot, you should probably use proper grammar. You’re = you are, your = possessive, like "your car”. I know history, and that shaped my agenda. You know the history TYT, Sam Seder, and Thom Hartman spoon-fed you and nothing else. That’s why you’re always wrong.

I’d rather be a Brooks clone than a Khicks26 clone. Who would want to be an evil hypocrite like this Khicks26 guy. He even laughed at his own post.

LOL you do live off the backs of workers. I didn't create the system I just live in it and doesn't mean I agree with it.

Yea we had a lot of capitalism in 2008 and 2020. History also shows the opposite. Still pointless.

Reagan was for socialism for the rich. That's why the government had to come in and bail out the banks while all the clown's got bonuses for ruining the economy. Capitalism is for the poor people.

Yes you did, and yes you did. We also have a lot of corporations that are over leveraged which can't support themselves.

More false equivalence. Of course it's Josh.

Your framing is BS and so is the false equivalence. All your conclusions are the same black and white BS. You're a small mind hack.

I said you know history, understanding it is a different thing. You understand none of it because YOUR a small mind hack.

It was funny, just because your shit isn't funny that's YOUR fault.