Trump Legal Cases

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    How many was charged with mass fraud after the 2020 election? No intellectually honest person thinks there was.

    The Fox news, the radical right, and the GOP will continue to push the lie that there was large scale fraud in the 2020 election, and countless more lies they expect you to believe even if its been proven to be a lie and/or they can't show any proof its true. Their viewers are addicted to their bullshit. Junkies.

    Most of the people charged in 2020 was GOP supporters.
    I like how you stuck in "mass" in front of fraud. The fact is there were people charged and convicted of election fraud in the 2020 election. Not one person was charged with insurrection for the simple reason ... there was no insurrection! Just a few idiots who rioted. Afterwards, the Left used that for political purposes lying that there was an insurrection to their base which will believe just about anything they are told.

    I already showed you how they stole the election. I also showed you how they rigged the election. You are just like a lazy paperboy, you aren't interested in delivering the news. Just spreading lies and false narrative by the same people that have been caught lying to you hundreds of times.


    And even after all that and all those videos and the FBI telling social media to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story and the 51 former intelligence officials lying it was Russian disinformation .... even after all that ... any intellectually honest person would just have to look at this ...

    Here are the total vote count figures for Democrats in the last six elections:
    2004 Kerry - 59M
    2008 Obama - 69.5M
    2012 Obama - 65.9M
    2016 Clinton - 65.9M
    2020 Biden - 81.3M
    2024 Harris - 66.4M


    ... to know that the election was stolen.


    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It is going to be epic!<br>������������ <a href="https://t.co/UYSFo0GTaf">pic.twitter.com/UYSFo0GTaf</a></p>&mdash; Sadie (@Sadie_NC) <a href="https://twitter.com/Sadie_NC/status/1879727771989299526?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >January 16, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    its because we already went over this. A couple times. It's still bullshit.

    Every candidate gets vetted. Trump was vetted twice even before the Muller investigation. All three times there was no evidence he colluded with Russia. Maniford evaded some taxes. Flynn just started communications early with Russia. We all know Comey said he purposely sent in 2 FBI agents to speak to Flynn because they weren't prepared. Then Comey took classified documents and gave them to his neighbor. That's a crime.

    All the rest that you posted doesn't show anything that a reasonable person could say Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election. Remember when Schiff stated he saw evidence of collusion with his own 2 eyes? Nothing of course and people just voted him to the senate. LOL. Remember the Pee Pee tapes and how they would be released any time now? Sources told the MSM that they saw the video and we'll all see for ourselves. That was 2015 wasn't it?

    You guys are being lied to so often that you are desensitized to rational thinking.


    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="und" dir="ltr">1992. <a rel="nofollow" href="https://t.co/57EXTTMvfb">pic.twitter.com/57EXTTMvfb</a></p>&mdash; Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1879272085857694181?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >January 14, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
    That is not what they plead guilty too.

    Are you lying or just uniformed. Either could be true.
    Here is three all with lying about Russia in the charges



    Flynn pleaded guilty in December 2017 to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russia during Trump's presidential transition and agreed to cooperate with Mueller.


    A judge ruled on Feb. 13 that Manafort breached the plea agreement by lying to prosecutors about matters material to the Russia probe.

    GEORGE PAPADOPOULOS
    The former Trump campaign adviser was sentenced in September to 14 days in prison after pleading guilty in October 2017 to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian officials, including a professor who told him the Russians had "dirt" on Trump's Democratic presidential rival, Hillary Clinton.


    Are these pleas lies? No, that is your answers for everything, you have been lied too. You have been lied to again by Fox and you bought it, hook, line and sinker.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    to this day, not one person was even charged with insurrection for what happened on J6.
    How many was charged with mass fraud after the 2020 election? No intellectually honest person thinks there was.

    The Fox news, the radical right, and the GOP will continue to push the lie that there was large scale fraud in the 2020 election, and countless more lies they expect you to believe even if its been proven to be a lie and/or they can't show any proof its true. Their viewers are addicted to their bullshit. Junkies.

    Most of the people charged in 2020 was GOP supporters.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    You notice he never addresses Trump allies, that plead guilty or was found guilty of illegal contact with Russians. But there was no collusion.
    Now he will talk about this one or that one lied but NEVER about the crimes that were committed. It is always someone else's fault.


    It was CNN and MSNBC fault. Oh, and the view.
    its because we already went over this. A couple times. It's still bullshit.

    Every candidate gets vetted. Trump was vetted twice even before the Muller investigation. All three times there was no evidence he colluded with Russia. Maniford evaded some taxes. Flynn just started communications early with Russia. We all know Comey said he purposely sent in 2 FBI agents to speak to Flynn because they weren't prepared. Then Comey took classified documents and gave them to his neighbor. That's a crime.

    All the rest that you posted doesn't show anything that a reasonable person could say Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election. Remember when Schiff stated he saw evidence of collusion with his own 2 eyes? Nothing of course and people just voted him to the senate. LOL. Remember the Pee Pee tapes and how they would be released any time now? Sources told the MSM that they saw the video and we'll all see for ourselves. That was 2015 wasn't it?

    You guys are being lied to so often that you are desensitized to rational thinking.


    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="und" dir="ltr">1992. <a href="https://t.co/57EXTTMvfb">pic.twitter.com/57EXTTMvfb</a></p>&mdash; Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) <a href="https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1879272085857694181?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >January 14, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by Hareeba!
    DipShit again displaying what a total dip shit he truly is.

    Leave alone for a moment the violent attack on the Capitol on Jan 6 and look at all the other highly incriminating evidence revealed by the House Committee and by Jack Smith into how Trump attempted to thwart the will of the voters and remain in power.

    I've not seen any repudiation from DipShit of the numerous (almost all by Republicans) recollections of what transpired between the election and Jan 6. All he banks on is the stupid claim that nobody has been charged with "insurrection" therefore there wasn't any. He really has zero comprehension the legal reasoning for that.

    Numerous defendants of their Jan 6 crimes clearly pointed the finger at Trump for inciting their attack on the Capitol.

    The Constitution is quite clear. Trump should never be permitted to attain any office again. Several courts have agreed.

    But the highly partisan SCOTUS simply squibbed the issue and referred it to Congress to take action ... fat chance with half of them being cowards afraid of retaliation.

    And further, the Constitution refers to providing "comfort" to those who choose to engage in insurrection.

    Just listen to the speech Trump made telling them how they are loved for their support.

    And particularly for his promise to pardon those who have been found guilty, including many who were found guilty of violent attacks on law enforcement personnel.

    Is that not "comfort"?



    You notice he never addresses Trump allies, that plead guilty or was found guilty of illegal contact with Russians. But there was no collusion.
    Now he will talk about this one or that one lied but NEVER about the crimes that were committed. It is always someone else's fault.


    It was CNN and MSNBC fault. Oh, and the view.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    Exactly what I think with 99% of what you post! Especially when it comes from 3/4 of a billion Fox.
    The Raw Story is as bad as CNN and MSNBC. They aren't in the news business. They are an extension of the democratic party. They lie, deceive, and somehow still seem to attract a few eyeballs. Its impossible to explain why Kinda like Just like The View. Some things can't be explained.

    Trump would have never been indicted for anything if he wasn't likely to run again or when he announced he was. All the rest is just fluff.



    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">All Democrats do is lie and cheat <a href="https://t.co/5dCQ37IDeQ">pic.twitter.com/5dCQ37IDeQ</a></p>&mdash; Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) <a href="https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1879717956940415213?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >January 16, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    further evidence people will believe just about anything no matter how ridiculous it is just because someone said so on the internet.

    Legal expert

    The Raw Story
    Exactly what I think with 99% of what you post! Especially when it comes from 3/4 of a billion Fox.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    'More important public interest': Legal expert says judge got Trump sentence wrong

    The solution, according to Foster, would have been a fine with a period of probation. "No drug testing or other restrictions. Just a requirement that he not commit any more crimes. I imagine that most defendants convicted of that crime end up with a similar sentence," Foster wrote.
    The legal analyst concluded, "Trump avoided impeachment by the U.S. Senate because he was no longer president. He avoided federal criminal prosecution because he was the president. He now avoids New York criminal penalties because he’s going to be president. Here in America, no one is above the law. Except for Donald Trump. Teflon Don."


    'More important public interest': Legal expert says judge got Trump sentence wrong
    further evidence people will believe just about anything no matter how ridiculous it is just because someone said so on the internet.

    Legal expert

    The Raw Story

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    'More important public interest': Legal expert says judge got Trump sentence wrong

    The solution, according to Foster, would have been a fine with a period of probation. "No drug testing or other restrictions. Just a requirement that he not commit any more crimes. I imagine that most defendants convicted of that crime end up with a similar sentence," Foster wrote.
    The legal analyst concluded, "Trump avoided impeachment by the U.S. Senate because he was no longer president. He avoided federal criminal prosecution because he was the president. He now avoids New York criminal penalties because he’s going to be president. Here in America, no one is above the law. Except for Donald Trump. Teflon Don."


    'More important public interest': Legal expert says judge got Trump sentence wrong

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jt315
    No no no ! There was an insurrection . Nancy Pelosi’s illegitimate Jan 6. committee with a Hollywood produced prime time hearing said so .
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Oh boy, the next few years are gonna be hilarious. <a href="https://t.co/gibjNgfY1J">pic.twitter.com/gibjNgfY1J</a></p>&mdash; Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) <a href="https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1879183832236368339?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >January 14, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute


    There was no insurrection.
    People who weren't rioting on J6 all deserve to be pardoned.
    Pretending Trump incited violence is just a political stunt by the democrats.
    We all saw and heard what Trump said that day.
    Only a fool still believe the lies they are being told about J6.

    No no no ! There was an insurrection . Nancy Pelosi’s illegitimate Jan 6. committee with a Hollywood produced prime time hearing said so .

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied


    There was no insurrection.
    People who weren't rioting on J6 all deserve to be pardoned.
    Pretending Trump incited violence is just a political stunt by the democrats.
    We all saw and heard what Trump said that day.
    Only a fool still believe the lies they are being told about J6.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    So, what is your spin on the Trump allies that plead guilty to ties to Russia

    How much of this is fake and lies. You believe whatever you are told too, from Trump and Fox news. 3/4 of a billion Fox. Then repeat the lies.

    Flynn pleaded guilty in December 2017 to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russia during Trump's presidential transition and agreed to cooperate with Mueller.


    A judge ruled on Feb. 13 that Manafort breached the plea agreement by lying to prosecutors about matters material to the Russia probe.


    GEORGE PAPADOPOULOS

    The former Trump campaign adviser was sentenced in September to 14 days in prison after pleading guilty in October 2017 to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian officials, including a professor who told him the Russians had "dirt" on Trump's Democratic presidential rival, Hillary Clinton.

    RICHARD PINEDO
    Pinedo was not involved with the Trump campaign, but in February he pleaded guilty to identity fraud in a case related to the Mueller investigation for helping Russian conspirators launder money, purchase Facebook ads and pay for supplies.

    Stone, 66, has faced scrutiny for his support for Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign, when he implied he had access to information obtained by hackers that could embarrass Democrats, including Trump's rival for the White House, Hillary Clinton.

    KONSTANTIN KILIMNIK
    A Manafort aide in Ukraine and a political operative with alleged ties to Russian intelligence, Kilimnik was charged in June with tampering with witnesses about their past lobbying for Ukraine’s former pro-Russian government.
    DipShit again displaying what a total dip shit he truly is.

    Leave alone for a moment the violent attack on the Capitol on Jan 6 and look at all the other highly incriminating evidence revealed by the House Committee and by Jack Smith into how Trump attempted to thwart the will of the voters and remain in power.

    I've not seen any repudiation from DipShit of the numerous (almost all by Republicans) recollections of what transpired between the election and Jan 6. All he banks on is the stupid claim that nobody has been charged with "insurrection" therefore there wasn't any. He really has zero comprehension the legal reasoning for that.

    Numerous defendants of their Jan 6 crimes clearly pointed the finger at Trump for inciting their attack on the Capitol.

    The Constitution is quite clear. Trump should never be permitted to attain any office again. Several courts have agreed.

    But the highly partisan SCOTUS simply squibbed the issue and referred it to Congress to take action ... fat chance with half of them being cowards afraid of retaliation.

    And further, the Constitution refers to providing "comfort" to those who choose to engage in insurrection.

    Just listen to the speech Trump made telling them how they are loved for their support.

    And particularly for his promise to pardon those who have been found guilty, including many who were found guilty of violent attacks on law enforcement personnel.

    Is that not "comfort"?



    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    No intellectually honest person thinks there was an insurrection on J6. There were a few idiots who rioted. There were dozens of FBI agents in the crowd. We all have eyes. We all saw what happened.



    The fake news media, the radical Left, and the democrats will continue to push the lie that there was an insurrection on J6 just as Russian collusion, "very fine people", "losers & suckers", and countless more lies they expect you to believe even if its been proven to be a lie and/or they can't show any proof its true. Their viewers are addicted to their bullshit. Junkies.

    So don't worry man, they won't stop. You'll have plenty more lies and false narratives to believe in over the coming months and years.
    So, what is your spin on the Trump allies that plead guilty to ties to Russia

    How much of this is fake and lies. You believe whatever you are told too, from Trump and Fox news. 3/4 of a billion Fox. Then repeat the lies.

    Flynn pleaded guilty in December 2017 to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russia during Trump's presidential transition and agreed to cooperate with Mueller.


    A judge ruled on Feb. 13 that Manafort breached the plea agreement by lying to prosecutors about matters material to the Russia probe.


    GEORGE PAPADOPOULOS

    The former Trump campaign adviser was sentenced in September to 14 days in prison after pleading guilty in October 2017 to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian officials, including a professor who told him the Russians had "dirt" on Trump's Democratic presidential rival, Hillary Clinton.

    RICHARD PINEDO
    Pinedo was not involved with the Trump campaign, but in February he pleaded guilty to identity fraud in a case related to the Mueller investigation for helping Russian conspirators launder money, purchase Facebook ads and pay for supplies.

    Stone, 66, has faced scrutiny for his support for Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign, when he implied he had access to information obtained by hackers that could embarrass Democrats, including Trump's rival for the White House, Hillary Clinton.

    KONSTANTIN KILIMNIK
    A Manafort aide in Ukraine and a political operative with alleged ties to Russian intelligence, Kilimnik was charged in June with tampering with witnesses about their past lobbying for Ukraine’s former pro-Russian government.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    History will remember Trump for the criminal he is.
    History will remember how a puppet president with dementia weaponized the justice system against their political opponent with sham indictments and even trying to remove him from the ballot in some States.

    One day people will hang their heads in shame when they realize the evil they defended, and the heroes they ridiculed.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    A friend of mine once said, ''They don't always get it right.'' Do you think he was wise.
    No intellectually honest person thinks there was an insurrection on J6. There were a few idiots who rioted. There were dozens of FBI agents in the crowd. We all have eyes. We all saw what happened.

    The fake news media, the radical Left, and the democrats will continue to push the lie that there was an insurrection on J6 just as Russian collusion, "very fine people", "losers & suckers", and countless more lies they expect you to believe even if its been proven to be a lie and/or they can't show any proof its true. Their viewers are addicted to their bullshit. Junkies.

    So don't worry man, they won't stop. You'll have plenty more lies and false narratives to believe in over the coming months and years.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    History will remember Trump for the criminal he is.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    to this day, not one person was even charged with insurrection for what happened on J6.
    A friend of mine once said, ''They don't always get it right.'' Do you think he was wise.

    Leave a comment:


  • khicks26
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    to this day, not one person was even charged with insurrection for what happened on J6.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    to this day, not one person was even charged with insurrection for what happened on J6.

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    [QUOTE=Hareeba!;31386035]

    Of course he would have.

    Add the House Select Inquiry findings into Jan. 6 and he would have been a dead duck.

    America has become a laughing stock for the way he's managed to delay delay delay delay delay with the complicity of the legal framework, and particularly the highly partisan SCOTUS.
    [/QUOTE]




    The report admits they contemplated but DECLINED charging Trump with a violation of the “insurrection act”. Which means they tried to impeach Trump for something prosecutors decided he could not be charged with.

    Worse still, the report claims “Courts have found or described the attack on the capital as an insurrection”. Citing the Colorado decision (!!!) which was UNANIMOUSLY overturned by the Supreme Court
    .

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    ^

    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Liberal guy gets instant karma when running over a Trump sign �� <a href="https://t.co/DRcnsI23zo">pic.twitter.com/DRcnsI23zo</a></p>&mdash; Defiant World (@DefiantWorld) <a href="https://twitter.com/DefiantWorld/status/1878781546636980495?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >January 13, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied


    Of course he would have.

    Add the House Select Inquiry findings into Jan. 6 and he would have been a dead duck.

    America has become a laughing stock for the way he's managed to delay delay delay delay delay with the complicity of the legal framework, and particularly the highly partisan SCOTUS.

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    Originally posted by Hareeba!
    The lawman who attempted to bring to justice the most dangerous criminal and TRAITOR in U.S. history, Jack Smith, has resigned from the DOJ.

    Jack Smith will be remembered as an American hero who was undermined by a cabal of corrupt far-right Supreme Court justices hellbent on protecting the authoritarian dictator of their creation.
    Jack and his associates, along with a ''SLEW'' of other Anti American Fascists will be remembered as traitors and losers.

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    Trump: "The Stench of Deranged Jack Smith and his thugs is GONE."

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by Hareeba!
    The lawman who attempted to bring to justice the most dangerous criminal and TRAITOR in U.S. history, Jack Smith, has resigned from the DOJ.

    Jack Smith will be remembered as an American hero who was undermined by a cabal of corrupt far-right Supreme Court justices hellbent on protecting the authoritarian dictator of their creation.
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">So long Jack Smith thanks for playing ���� <a href="https://t.co/TvJb2zFdC9">pic.twitter.com/TvJb2zFdC9</a></p>&mdash; Politi_Rican ���� �� ���� (@TheRicanMemes) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheRicanMemes/status/1878380527771701320?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >January 12, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The UNCONSTITUTIONAL Special Prostitute Jack Smith who spent +$50,000,000 to plant evidence against Donald Trump officially resigns. <br><br>Tampering with evidence is a third-degree felony, punishable by 2 to 10 years in prison and fines up to $10,000.<br><br>Meaning the FBI had already… <a href="https://t.co/inWtepHC7u">https://t.co/inWtepHC7u</a> <a href="https://t.co/ba2FY6nEAZ">pic.twitter.com/ba2FY6nEAZ</a></p>&mdash; ����RealRobert���� (@Real_RobN) <a href="https://twitter.com/Real_RobN/status/1878220101943709962?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >January 11, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Jack Smith is a loser and will be remembered as the &quot;yes man&quot; who followed his marching orders like a little coward.<br><br>He did IMMENSE damage to whatever is left of the justice system in this country. <br><br>History will not be kind to this piece of filth. <a href="https://t.co/98CU8M5l3e">pic.twitter.com/98CU8M5l3e</a></p>&mdash; Shawn Farash (@Shawn_Farash) <a href="https://twitter.com/Shawn_Farash/status/1861252884412637291?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >November 26, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    The lawman who attempted to bring to justice the most dangerous criminal and TRAITOR in U.S. history, Jack Smith, has resigned from the DOJ.

    Jack Smith will be remembered as an American hero who was undermined by a cabal of corrupt far-right Supreme Court justices hellbent on protecting the authoritarian dictator of their creation.

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    Trump broke him.
    He broke a bunch of em'. Bragg, Fani, Biden, Kamala... ETC... L O freeking L

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by slewfan
    Trump broke him.

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    Ya' got-em now Lefties. Uhhh, well... Maybe.?


    HE'S OUT

    Special Counsel Jack Smith, who led cases against Trump, resigns from Justice Dept

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jt315
    A Trump non disclosure agreement bootstrapped to a mystery felony by some fat radical Soros funded POS that the Supreme Court will piss all over . And that’s without their immunity decision that came after the sham trial .
    Even some on the left have called BS .


    Hareeballs - "Trump won't even be the republican nominee!"
    Hareeballs - "They got him now. How can he be president wearing an orange jumpsuit?"

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    Originally posted by Hareeba!
    Judge Juan Merchan’s decision Friday was not wholly unexpected because he sadly tipped us to it days ago.


    Essentially, this guy decided that a man whose character references include — but are not limited to — being a compulsive liar, an enemy of America, a tax cheat, a multiple women-abuser, and a twice-impeached racist didn’t even deserve a slap on his fat little wrist for being convicted by a jury on 34 felony counts.

    Worse? There is absolutely no legal precedent for Merchan’s disregard for the law, proving yet again that the inmates run our courts in America.

    Here is how The New York Times reported on that bit this morning:

    Mr. Trump, who was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to cover up a sex scandal, had originally faced probation or up to four years in prison, and a New York Times analysis revealed that Justice Merchan had ample ground to consider incarceration.

    Since 2014, a third of defendants sentenced to the most serious charge of falsifying business records in the first degree in Manhattan received jail time, amounting to less than a year behind bars.

    Other defendants received prison time — more than a year’s incarceration — or were sentenced to probation, conditional discharges, community service or fines.

    No other defendant in the cases examined received an unconditional discharge.


    This is completely insulting and defies any rational explanation.


    Understand this, good people: Trump is above the law, precisely because he was carefully placed there by a justice system in America that is so perverted, so dishonest, and so bought-off it is completely untrustworthy and worthless.
    A Trump non disclosure agreement bootstrapped to a mystery felony by some fat radical Soros funded POS that the Supreme Court will piss all over . And that’s without their immunity decision that came after the sham trial .
    Even some on the left have called BS .

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Judge Juan Merchan’s decision Friday was not wholly unexpected because he sadly tipped us to it days ago.


    Essentially, this guy decided that a man whose character references include — but are not limited to — being a compulsive liar, an enemy of America, a tax cheat, a multiple women-abuser, and a twice-impeached racist didn’t even deserve a slap on his fat little wrist for being convicted by a jury on 34 felony counts.

    Worse? There is absolutely no legal precedent for Merchan’s disregard for the law, proving yet again that the inmates run our courts in America.

    Here is how The New York Times reported on that bit this morning:

    Mr. Trump, who was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to cover up a sex scandal, had originally faced probation or up to four years in prison, and a New York Times analysis revealed that Justice Merchan had ample ground to consider incarceration.

    Since 2014, a third of defendants sentenced to the most serious charge of falsifying business records in the first degree in Manhattan received jail time, amounting to less than a year behind bars.

    Other defendants received prison time — more than a year’s incarceration — or were sentenced to probation, conditional discharges, community service or fines.

    No other defendant in the cases examined received an unconditional discharge.


    This is completely insulting and defies any rational explanation.


    Understand this, good people: Trump is above the law, precisely because he was carefully placed there by a justice system in America that is so perverted, so dishonest, and so bought-off it is completely untrustworthy and worthless.

    Leave a comment:

SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
Working...