Okay I gotta hear how Obama is tied up in a Netflix conspiracy.
Trump outside himself on this distractor
d2bets
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-10-05
39847
#2
Obama is producing a forthcoming series on Netflix.
Somehow this is controversial to Trump.
Comment
rkelly110
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
10-05-09
39410
#3
Maybe ol' trumpy bear needs to resign the day before election day and do us ALL a favor.
Comment
RoyBacon
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
09-21-05
37074
#4
Yea and the Russians paid the Clintons $140 million and incedibly there was nothing to see there either.
Always follow the money. $65 million for a documentary? Is there a reason that's $64 million over market?
Comment
keely85
SBR MVP
01-04-15
4296
#5
Lmao u talking about following the money???
Roy you kill me buddy.
Maybe Netflix wants him to do this bc it will bring in viewers. What’s Trump gonna talk about? His shit properties or grabbing women by the privates?
Comment
RoyBacon
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
09-21-05
37074
#6
Originally posted by keely85
Lmao u talking about following the money???
Roy you kill me buddy.
Maybe Netflix wants him to do this bc it will bring in viewers. What’s Trump gonna talk about? His shit properties or grabbing women by the privates?
Dude it's like money laundering.
Why did Goldmans pay Hillary $500k for a 10 min speech? You think they might of wanted something? Why did Putin donate $140 million to the clintons?
So now why is Netflix over paying by $64 million to the obama's?
Comment
d2bets
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-10-05
39847
#7
Originally posted by RoyBacon
Yea and the Russians paid the Clintons $140 million and incedibly there was nothing to see there either.
Always follow the money. $65 million for a documentary? Is there a reason that's $64 million over market?
$64 mil over market based on what? Trump just jealous that NBC paid him less.
Netflix gave Seinfeld a 100 mil dollar deal. Investigate that too?
Comment
dante1
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
10-31-05
38658
#8
Originally posted by d2bets
$64 mil over market based on what? Trump just jealous that NBC paid him less.
Netflix gave Seinfeld a 100 mil dollar deal. Investigate that too?
that doesn't count, when millionaires receive huge bailouts after fckin the country/company that doesn't count. you know if these guys, or idiots would at least be consistent you would be able to talk/write logically with them. Case in point, when Obama was president (ranked 12th by over 100 bipartisan historians) these guys would nitpick the smallest thing like he didn't wear a USA flag. Then trump comes along and buries every tradition, talks collusion with Russia right on the air ways, is incompetent to the highest degree, hires piss poor people, fcks up every foreign trade relation, fights with our allies, gives comfort to our enemies, and 12,000 lies to the people.
And that is perfectly ok, they are simpletons.
Comment
dante1
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
10-31-05
38658
#9
where is Dwightieanne, oh yeah I forgot he is on a time out. Can't use the word pedophile dwightieanne it is a no no. you also can't call another poster a "kiddie porn" guy that too is a no no.
Again, Dwightieanne use your words, now we all know your vocabulary is limited to 99 words and that is tops. you don't know the difference between breathe and breath, picture and pitcher, and its and it's. and these are only three. Plus like Dumwilly you are unable to do simple math, you won't tell us about your pretend job, or that great book you read, or the reason you steal material and write "I wrote" on top.
hmmm.
Well, we can communicate when you return tomorrow. lol
Comment
RoyBacon
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
09-21-05
37074
#10
Originally posted by d2bets
$64 mil over market based on what? Trump just jealous that NBC paid him less.
Netflix gave Seinfeld a 100 mil dollar deal. Investigate that too?
Seinfield is an A+actor. Obama is not an actor. Obama would have done the 2 week gig for a million or less so why pay him $65 million?
Is it for any favors he did or will do? Is netflix just tards who want to give him $64 million for nothing?
Comment
vitterd
Restricted User
09-14-17
59265
#11
Originally posted by RoyBacon
Seinfield is an A+actor. Obama is not an actor. Obama would have done the 2 week gig for a million or less so why pay him $65 million?
Is it for any favors he did or will do? Is netflix just tards who want to give him $64 million for nothing?
Mr Patriot against capitalism. Roy is twisted like a pretzel
Comment
RoyBacon
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
09-21-05
37074
#12
Originally posted by vitterd
Mr Patriot against capitalism. Roy is twisted like a pretzel
Vitty, from your reply it's obvious this thread is a tad too complicated for you.
Please choose a more intelligence appropriate thread. Thank you.
Comment
vitterd
Restricted User
09-14-17
59265
#13
Originally posted by RoyBacon
Vitty, from your reply it's obvious this thread is a tad too complicated for you.
Please choose a more intelligence appropriate thread. Thank you.
Roy getting battered.....I think your BF finally collapsed under his own weight. Jt315 can’t even help you now!!
Your president is tweeting about Obama and Netflix! Lmao
Comment
RoyBacon
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
09-21-05
37074
#14
Originally posted by vitterd
Roy getting battered.....I think your BF finally collapsed under his own weight. Jt315 can’t even help you now!!
Your president is tweeting about Obama and Netflix! Lmao
When Trump mentions something a couple of times it's worth looking into. Think Obama is spying on me.
So why is Netflix paying Obama 64x fair market? Is it a campaign finance violation? Probably should get Mueller Time on the case. LOL
Comment
vitterd
Restricted User
09-14-17
59265
#15
Originally posted by RoyBacon
When Trump mentions something a couple of times it's worth looking into. Think Obama is spying on me.
So why is Netflix paying Obama 64x fair market? Is it a campaign finance violation? Probably should get Mueller Time on the case. LOL
Obama worth the price. Last poll he was the most admired man in the country. Get your worth Obamas!
Comment
d2bets
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-10-05
39847
#16
Originally posted by RoyBacon
When Trump mentions something a couple of times it's worth looking into. Think Obama is spying on me.
So why is Netflix paying Obama 64x fair market? Is it a campaign finance violation? Probably should get Mueller Time on the case. LOL
You keep making up fair market. Hell, I'd say he's underpaid. What's his competition as an ex-president? He should have demanded more.
Comment
keely85
SBR MVP
01-04-15
4296
#17
They have penetrating glass blowing and cooking shows on Netflix. They’re not actors. Neither are people in the other documentaries about murderers and rape. Obama is someone a lot of people would watch a show. No one watches the Apprentice even to see Trump.
That’s a silly argument.
Comment
Nitrogen
SBR MVP
08-15-16
1972
#18
Originally posted by RoyBacon
Seinfield is an A+actor. Obama is not an actor. Obama would have done the 2 week gig for a million or less so why pay him $65 million?
Dave Chappelle reportedly received 60 million from Netflix for his comedy special.
You're suddenly an expert on the market for streaming content or what Obama would do a 2 week gig for?
Comment
RoyBacon
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
09-21-05
37074
#19
Well Obama's going rate is $250k a day/speech and it's a week of work.
We have investigated Trump for much, much, much less.
So let's get a special prosecutor in there and figure out why Obama is getting 63x fair market value.
Comment
Nitrogen
SBR MVP
08-15-16
1972
#20
Originally posted by RoyBacon
So let's get a special prosecutor in there and figure out why Obama is getting 63x fair market value.
For someone who speaks with legit insight on stocks etc, you sure grab the retard trophy when you step outside of your wheelhouse.
I can only imagine how fast your head would explode if you ever pointed your conspiracy dowsing rod at the tangerine in charge.
ex: Trump tweeting he's ready to attack Iran on behalf of a non nato country...that just happens to own a floor of his tower.
Comment
vitterd
Restricted User
09-14-17
59265
#21
This thread is a bacon funeral. Once again he’s getting buried.
Comment
RoyBacon
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
09-21-05
37074
#22
Originally posted by Nitrogen
For someone who speaks with legit insight on stocks etc, you sure grab the retard trophy when you step outside of your wheelhouse.
I can only imagine how fast your head would explode if you ever pointed your conspiracy dowsing rod at the tangerine in charge.
ex: Trump tweeting he's ready to attack Iran on behalf of a non nato country...that just happens to own a floor of his tower.
You mean like when we had a 2 year investigation with a special prosecutor and it turns out the POTUS did absolutely nothing wrong????
Comment
vitterd
Restricted User
09-14-17
59265
#23
Originally posted by RoyBacon
You mean like when we had a 2 year investigation with a special prosecutor and it turns out the POTUS did absolutely nothing wrong????
Nothing wrong? If not for Mueller not being able to indict a sitting president.....he would have been indicted. Sometimes I wonder if you were dropped on your head a lot.
Comment
d2bets
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-10-05
39847
#24
Originally posted by RoyBacon
Well Obama's going rate is $250k a day/speech and it's a week of work.
We have investigated Trump for much, much, much less.
So let's get a special prosecutor in there and figure out why Obama is getting 63x fair market value.
Comment
Nitrogen
SBR MVP
08-15-16
1972
#25
Originally posted by RoyBacon
You mean like when we had a 2 year investigation with a special prosecutor and it turns out the POTUS did absolutely nothing wrong????
If you don't count the 8-9 items of obstruction of justice that the special prosecutor refused to charge because of "guidelines" alone.
Or the countless times that members of his team flat out lied about contacts with Russia
Or the fact that his g-d campaign manager is in jail now...and his bribe paying lawyer is in jail now.
By your logic, the trial against OJ proved his innocence.
Comment
DwightShrute
SBR Aristocracy
01-17-09
101161
#26
Originally posted by Nitrogen
If you don't count the 8-9 items of obstruction of justice that the special prosecutor refused to charge because of "guidelines" alone. Mueller was hired to look at collusion with Russia. Found nothing as the previous 3 separate investigations also found, so you guys shift to obstruction and pretend its even anything close to colluding with Russia. Its embarrassing watching you guys echo what the dumb dishonest people on TV tell you. How can you obstruct something that never happened? Any person would what they could to prevent a phony investigation, never mind the 4th one.
Or the countless times that members of his team flat out lied about contacts with Russia
Or the fact that his g-d campaign manager is in jail now...and his bribe paying lawyer is in jail now. For not paying taxes. Nothing to do with Trump or Trump and Russia.
By your logic, the trial against OJ proved his innocence.
Comment
ByeShea
SBR Hall of Famer
06-30-08
7913
#27
Originally posted by keely85
Lmao u talking about following the money???
Lmao ... u!
Want to follow some money?
Hillary's "charity" collected $150 million from the Russians while she was Secretary of State - husband Bill collected $500k for an hour speech in Moscow.
Shortly thereafter Hillary okays sale of Uranium One to Russian firm (directly controlled by Putin), ensuring that 20% of US uranium is Putin's.
Amount President Trump accepted from Russians? $0.
And guess who gets investigated for collusion with Russians? Trump.
-
Follow the fukkin' money. Ha.
Comment
RoyBacon
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
09-21-05
37074
#28
Originally posted by Nitrogen
If you don't count the 8-9 items of obstruction of justice that the special prosecutor refused to charge because of "guidelines" alone.
Or the countless times that members of his team flat out lied about contacts with Russia
Or the fact that his g-d campaign manager is in jail now...and his bribe paying lawyer is in jail now.
By your logic, the trial against OJ proved his innocence.
Obstructing an investigation into a crime that did not exist?
You are making my case to doing a full special prosecutor on the Obama's for money laundering. Mueller Time!
Maybe the Obama's will call BS and we get them on Obstruction???
Comment
rkelly110
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
10-05-09
39410
#29
Originally posted by ByeShea
Lmao ... u!
Want to follow some money?
Hillary's "charity" collected $150 million from the Russians while she was Secretary of State - husband Bill collected $500k for an hour speech in Moscow.
Shortly thereafter Hillary okays sale of Uranium One to Russian firm (directly controlled by Putin), ensuring that 20% of US uranium is Putin's.
Amount President Trump accepted from Russians? $0.
And guess who gets investigated for collusion with Russians? Trump.
-
Follow the fukkin' money. Ha.
Uh, you might want to fact check that claim there big boy. Don't be like your king.
Comment
Nitrogen
SBR MVP
08-15-16
1972
#30
Originally posted by RoyBacon
Obstructing an investigation into a crime that did not exist?
If you're being charged with a crime (that you know you did not commit), and instruct all your employees to GTFO of the country so they can't give statements, that's still obstruction - and still very much a crime.
Comment
DwightShrute
SBR Aristocracy
01-17-09
101161
#31
Originally posted by Nitrogen
If you're being charged with a crime (that you know you did not commit), and instruct all your employees to GTFO of the country so they can't give statements, that's still obstruction - and still very much a crime.
who did that? LOL. Don't say Trump because that isn't true.
Comment
Nitrogen
SBR MVP
08-15-16
1972
#32
Originally posted by DwightShrute
who did that? LOL. Don't say Trump because that isn't true.
I gave an example of obstruction.
Trump instructed McGahn to lie regarding his demand to have the Special Counsel removed. McGahn under oath testified that this in fact happened (while Trump, refusing to go under oath) called this a lie / fake news.
But for the "guidelines", this, the bogus claims about the firing of Comey, would have be 2 very clear chargeable instances of obstruction.
Comment
DwightShrute
SBR Aristocracy
01-17-09
101161
#33
Originally posted by Nitrogen
I gave an example of obstruction.
Trump instructed McGahn to lie regarding his demand to have the Special Counsel removed. McGahn under oath testified that this in fact happened (while Trump, refusing to go under oath) called this a lie / fake news.
But for the "guidelines", this, the bogus claims about the firing of Comey, would have be 2 very clear chargeable instances of obstruction.
I was referring to your comment ... "instruct all your employees to GTFO of the country so they can't give statements". When did Trump instruct all his employees to take a plane somewhere?
Comment
Nitrogen
SBR MVP
08-15-16
1972
#34
Originally posted by DwightShrute
I was referring to your comment ... "instruct all your employees to GTFO of the country so they can't give statements". When did Trump instruct all his employees to take a plane somewhere?
I didn't. I was giving an example of how a person can commit obstruction, even though they were not guilty of a crime being investigated (it was a response to Roy saying "Obstructing an investigation into a crime that did not exist?"). My response was that you can commit and be charged with crimes for obstructing an investigation - regardless of whether you know there was no initial crime.
Comment
DwightShrute
SBR Aristocracy
01-17-09
101161
#35
Originally posted by Nitrogen
I didn't. I was giving an example of how a person can commit obstruction, even though they were not guilty of a crime being investigated (it was a response to Roy saying "Obstructing an investigation into a crime that did not exist?"). My response was that you can commit and be charged with crimes for obstructing an investigation - regardless of whether you know there was no initial crime.
ok thanks for clarifying.
On that topic though, I think you will agree that the Mueller investigation was for one purpose and one purpose only. To determine whether Trump colluded with Russia. 4 separate investigations all said NO he never did. In fact, every investigation clearly stated that NO AMERICAN did. So why continue this nonsense? Obstruction? Come on. You won't agree of course but at least you can honestly say to yourself, "hey I see what they mean. This is so fukking dumb".