SSK's NBA Thread

**rfr3sh** · 01-31-11, 04:29 PM

so what happens if he wins
I think he will say it paid out 100 units so he is in the green

**big0mar** · 01-31-11, 04:32 PM

Originally posted by MartinBlank

Anyone else notice how SSK can't calculate what the parlay payout would be? I love those.

Does anything with this guy surprise you?

His first thread talked about making $1M from offshore books

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 04:35 PM

Originally posted by rfr3sh

so what happens if he wins
I think he will say it paid out 100 units so he is in the green

Lol? I am telling how much I'm risking, there is only 1 payout value per risk value. So listing the risk value is sufficient, and determines payout value

**rfr3sh** · 01-31-11, 04:36 PM

But for record keeping you need to post the win amount
so if by chance it hits you can keep an accurate record

how dumb are you

**daneault23** · 01-31-11, 04:52 PM

Originally posted by MartinBlank

Anyone else notice how SSK can't calculate what the parlay payout would be?

I love those.

When you make the bet, it tells you how much you could win. All he would have to do is take the amount won and divide it by however much a unit is and it will tell you how many units you would have won

**JohnnyD4916** · 01-31-11, 05:09 PM

Let's win some cash tonight, I'll be in Dallas tonight to watch that game with my buddy Mark Cuban. Party at his house after the game! Good luck tonight!

**rfr3sh** · 01-31-11, 05:11 PM

Originally posted by daneault23

When you make the bet, it tells you how much you could win. All he would have to do is take the amount won and divide it by however much a unit is and it will tell you how many units you would have won

thats the key here
you have to make the bet

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 05:15 PM

Originally posted by rfr3sh

But for record keeping you need to post the win amount
so if by chance it hits you can keep an accurate record

how dumb are you

And if I do win I can calculate the payout then. What's the point of calculating payout now? It will still be the same value if I calculate it now or later.

How dumb r u?

**big0mar** · 01-31-11, 05:16 PM

MODS- please take note of this thread when considering if Players Talk should be 18+

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 05:17 PM

Originally posted by rfr3sh

thats the key here
you have to make the bet

Click on the thread titled "bookmaker" on SBR talking about WA residents and what they should do with bookmaker

Lol at not actually betting

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 05:19 PM

Originally posted by big0mar

MODS- please take note of this thread when considering if Players Talk should be 18+

Yeah so they can keep kids like u away

**LChruscial85** · 01-31-11, 05:20 PM

Originally posted by ssk13809

Lol? I am telling how much I'm risking, there is only 1 payout value per risk value. So listing the risk value is sufficient, and determines payout value

Why did you put a question mark in front of Lol? Is it because your laugh out loud team didn't give you permission to answer?

**LChruscial85** · 01-31-11, 05:21 PM

Remember everyone, according to SSK math has nothing to do with sportsbetting

**LChruscial85** · 01-31-11, 05:23 PM

Originally posted by ssk13809

And if I do win I can calculate the payout then. What's the point of calculating payout now? It will still be the same value if I calculate it now or later.

How dumb r u?

If you calculate your ATS wagers and Teaser wagers before the games, it would be fair to assume everyone here would expect to see the payout for your parlays that never win

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 05:42 PM

Originally posted by LChruscial85

If you calculate your ATS wagers and Teaser wagers before the games, it would be fair to assume everyone here would expect to see the payout for your parlays that never win

On ATS its not clear what the payout/risk is because I don't list -110 or -115 or whatever juice. So I HAVE to tell the payout and risk on those.

However on MLs it's not necessary
and u can figure out payout if u know risk

Are all u guys ammatutes or something?

**dugdogg** · 01-31-11, 05:56 PM

heat -6000????

**phillybadboy** · 01-31-11, 06:56 PM

thanks for the plays ssk,

**MartinBlank** · 01-31-11, 08:47 PM

The losing started quick tonight.

The hired "Halftime Team" just lost their opening effort------

I seriously haven't seen losing like this in a long time.

It takes special talent to post loser after loser.

**Full Time Hobo** · 01-31-11, 09:04 PM

Originally posted by MartinBlank

The losing started quick tonight. The hired "Halftime Team" just lost their opening effort------

I seriously haven't seen losing like this in a long time. It takes special talent to post loser after loser.

Broke Landers does it all the time

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 09:06 PM

Wow

I had Heat -10 halftime line

They lead by 10+ the WHOLE 2nd quarter. Up 18 with just 2 minutes left in the quarter. And the Cavs finish 11-2 run in 2 minutes including a last second lay-up making it a 9 point game.

This is unbelievable. 1st I used to collapse at the end of games, now I'm collapsing at end of halves.

Bad beat after bad beat

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 09:08 PM

Originally posted by Full Time Hobo

Broke Landers does it all the time

Does he do it catching bad beats or last minute collapses every time?

**rfr3sh** · 01-31-11, 09:08 PM

excuses excuses

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 09:10 PM

Originally posted by rfr3sh

excuses excuses

Unless you can prove that teams leading entering the 4th quarter lose > 50%, or teams leading finish games (halves too now) with bad runs > 50% of the time...

They are good excuses. Bad beats are rare events. My last 4 ATS losses have occurred with my team leading coming into the 4th and then losing the game SU. 4 in a row. The odds of that happening from a statistical standpoint? Low. In other words, BAD BEATS.

And the Heat collapse was just said. 64-46 with 2 min left, and they let the Cavs outscore them 11-2 LOL.

**MartinBlank** · 01-31-11, 09:14 PM

Originally posted by ssk13809

Unless you can prove that teams leading entering the 4th quarter lose > 50%, or teams leading finish games (halves too now) with bad runs > 50% of the time...

They are good excuses. Bad beats are rare events. My last 4 ATS losses have occurred with my team leading coming into the 4th and then losing the game SU. 4 in a row. The odds of that happening from a statistical standpoint? Low. In other words, BAD BEATS.

And the Heat collapse was just said. 64-46 with 2 min left, and they let the Cavs outscore them 11-2 LOL.

OHHHHH. I saw this category on Jeopardy.

"Things losing degenerate gamblers say".

**rfr3sh** · 01-31-11, 09:15 PM

Originally posted by MartinBlank

OHHHHH. I saw this category on Jeopardy.

"Things losing degenerate gamblers say".

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 09:15 PM

Personally, here is what I do

If I win a bet because of a last minute run, or a something very lucky, like the way I've been losing. I tell the bookie, "I don't want my money I won because of a bad beat"

That's just me. That's a lucky win (or loss) not skill. I was on the wrong side, and I won by pure luck. Kind of like what has happened to me except I've been on the right side and have just caught bad beats.

So I don't even take the money in those occasions. Unfortunately I'm always on the right side so those are rare, and I still have to end up paying even when I lose by these bad beats.

**rfr3sh** · 01-31-11, 09:16 PM

Originally posted by ssk13809

Personally, here is what I do

If I win a bet because of a last minute run, or a something very lucky, like the way I've been losing. I tell the bookie, "I don't want my money I won because of a bad beat"

That's just me. That's a lucky win (or loss) not skill. I was on the wrong side, and I won by pure luck. Kind of like what has happened to me except I've been on the right side and have just caught bad beats.

So I don't even take the money in those occasions. Unfortunately I'm always on the right side so those are rare, and I still have to end up paying even when I lose by these bad beats.

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 09:17 PM

Originally posted by MartinBlank

OHHHHH. I saw this category on Jeopardy.

"Things losing degenerate gamblers say".

Teams that are leading coming into the 4th quarter win their games 85% of the time in the NBA. My teams lost that 4 games in a row. Hey math guy you want to tell me how rare or how low of a probability the events that I just went through were?

I hope low enough. .0005 or .05%

It's shocking I'm still trying

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 09:19 PM

Originally posted by rfr3sh

That's just how I roll. I like to earn my money. Not win by good beats or luck.

But like I said, I'm always on the right side, so it's rare I win by a good beat.

**nyed1010** · 01-31-11, 09:20 PM

Originally posted by ssk13809

Personally, here is what I do

If I win a bet because of a last minute run, or a something very lucky, like the way I've been losing. I tell the bookie, "I don't want my money I won because of a bad beat"

That's just me. That's a lucky win (or loss) not skill. I was on the wrong side, and I won by pure luck. Kind of like what has happened to me except I've been on the right side and have just caught bad beats.

So I don't even take the money in those occasions. Unfortunately I'm always on the right side so those are rare, and I still have to end up paying even when I lose by these bad beats.

somebody give this man a medal

How is there not a 2 hour SSK special on comedy central yet?

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 09:22 PM

So you can just imagine how distressed I feel. After years of not taking money from books on my winnings off good beats...I have to pay win I lose off my losses in bad beats.

I still feel all losses because of

-bad beats
-good beats
-injuries during games

should just be voided. This is what takes the "skill" aspect out of capping and makes it more based on "luck" where guys like Martin Blank can come in and laugh at a skilled capper who has been getting unlucky.

**rfr3sh** · 01-31-11, 09:23 PM

Told you pacers ML was a lock

**MartinBlank** · 01-31-11, 09:23 PM

Well, result #2 is in the books---and you guessed it.

Another loss.

The Raptors went to to Indiana costing SSK yet another 2 units.

The losing continues-----

**ssk13809** · 01-31-11, 09:24 PM

Originally posted by MartinBlank

Well, result #2 is in the books---and you guessed it.

Another loss.

The Raptors went to to Indiana costing SSK yet another 2 units.

The losing continues-----

You're speaking way too early. You know my day is made or broken based on the Clippers game. Don't be caught talking too early like you were earlier when Dallas beat LAC.

**MartinBlank** · 01-31-11, 09:25 PM

Originally posted by ssk13809

So you can just imagine how distressed I feel. After years of not taking money from books on my winnings off good beats...I have to pay win I lose off my losses in bad beats.

I still feel all losses because of

-bad beats
-good beats
-injuries during games

should just be voided. This is what takes the "skill" aspect out of capping and makes it more based on "luck" where guys like Martin Blank can come in and laugh at a skilled capper who has been getting unlucky.

OHHHHH.

I saw this on Jeopardy TOO!!

"Things delusional degenerate gamblers say".

Weird how all these gambling answers keep coming up tonight.