Seahawks ML over the Saints

[plzkthx]

I feel it, somehow the hawks are going to pull off a huge upset.

[lakerboy]

Goat you can say all u want but don't bullshit. I took the saints last year in the bowl and it was posted in my nfl playoff thread. I also took the saints ml +235 in the second hf. If you don't like my picks I could care less but don't make up shit.

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/336312-saints-4-235-2nd-half.html

[dfberger23]

Seattle might cover but no chance they win. Saints are real good this year, people seem to forget that.

[big0mar]

For all those saying SEA ML is a bad bet, what % chance do you believe they have to win?

[ROYAJA8]

Seattle definitely covers the line. Hopefully they beat the overrated saints.

[The Seer]

It looks like the Seahawks with the points are gonna be my play but I'm not confident enough to play the ml here. GL though LB.

[uhuhahah]

take sea and points

[The J-Dizzle]

I'm not sure the MLs are good value here.

Having said that, a lot of people here supporting NO don't understand how to be profitable.

Whether you think NO is likely to win is irrelevant. Its about determining their value.

I'm supporting NO in this game. I DON'T understand how to be profitable?

Then tell me how much profit you have made this NFL-season Lakerboy.


And why care so much about value, when what you really should be worried about is to pick winners.

Winners > Value.

[t-wizzle]

Goat you can say all u want but don't bullshit. I took the saints last year in the bowl and it was posted in my nfl playoff thread. I also took the saints ml +235 in the second hf. If you don't like my picks I could care less but don't make up shit.

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...-2nd-half.html

He's a hater but we already knew that. Don't forget, he came to sbr because of you

[Goat Milk]

I find it interesting how you don't respond to any of the good posts in this thread that are breaking down the game.

Your statements have been proven wrong but it seems you don't know enough about the game to support any of them with facts.

There's no point to try and act sharp and take Seattle ML when you know the saints will win. Your just trying to get lucky here and get some attention

[t-wizzle]

None of these clowns on sbr know how to break down a game. Everyone here thinks they are an expert. The truth is that New Orleans isn't the same team they were last season and Seattle has the advantage of coming off a huge victory and a great home field. I think Saints win but the game will be decided by one score.

[t-wizzle]

By the way, Drew Brees threw 22 ints this year. 22!

Saints lost by 10 on the road against a terrible Cardinals team, by 13 at home to the Browns, and barely beat Dallas and a shitty Bengals team. And don't give me that "they didn't try yesterday" bullshit. The Saints tried but were outplayed by Tampa Bay in their own building. Why would they play all their starters and lose on purpose going into the playoffs?

[paco]

By the way, Drew Brees threw 22 ints this year. 22! Saints lost by 10 on the road against a terrible Cardinals team, by 13 at home to the Browns, and barely beat Dallas and a shitty Bengals team. And don't give me that "they didn't try yesterday" bullshit. The Saints tried but were outplayed by Tampa Bay in their own building. Why would they play all their starters and lose on purpose going into the playoffs?

Actually, Saints recovered a fumble when they were down by only 7 with about 8-9 mins left, yet Sean Payton decided not to put Brees in and rather let the rookie go in. If they really wanted to win that, dont u think Brees would be in only needing bout 35 yards to tie? I didnt have money on the game, but at that point, or even since halftime, they saw Falcons were whipping up on the Panthers and this game meant nothing at that point.

About the Seahawks, i cant even beleive we are even discussing this team beating the Saints, they are the 1st team in nfl history to make the playoffs with that record. They just got lucky to be there since that division stinks. I did have money on the Seahawks yesterday beating the Rams, but come on, The Saints aint losing.

[HoulihansTX]

The Saints aint losing.

This

[big0mar]

I'm supporting NO in this game. I DON'T understand how to be profitable?

Then tell me how much profit you have made this NFL-season Lakerboy.


And why care so much about value, when what you really should be worried about is to pick winners.

Winners > Value.

You're a fukking fish.

I'll give you NO -1000. 1000 points max. Post up right here.

[t-wizzle]

Actually, Saints recovered a fumble when they were down by only 7 with about 8-9 mins left, yet Sean Payton decided not to put Brees in and rather let the rookie go in. If they really wanted to win that, dont u think Brees would be in only needing bout 35 yards to tie? I didnt have money on the game, but at that point, or even since halftime, they saw Falcons were whipping up on the Panthers and this game meant nothing at that point.

About the Seahawks, i cant even beleive we are even discussing this team beating the Saints, they are the 1st team in nfl history to make the playoffs with that record. They just got lucky to be there since that division stinks. I did have money on the Seahawks yesterday beating the Rams, but come on, The Saints aint losing.

Don't see them losing either Pac but to me it's just way too many points. Only point I'm making is that all things considered, I think Seattle will be in the game til the end.

[The J-Dizzle]

You're a fukking fish.

I'll give you NO -1000. 1000 points max. Post up right here.

Haha, you're a fish.

That message wasn't adressed to you, but to LB. He said that we who supports NO don't understand to be profitable, but what is his record for the season?


Attention-thread. How much has LB on Seahawks ML if he thinks it's such a good bet??

[pavyracer]

Saints will win easily.

[HoulihansTX]

Haha, you're a fish. That message wasn't adressed to you, but to LB. He said that we who supports NO don't understand to be profitable, but what is his record for the season? Attention-thread. How much has LB on Seahawks ML if he thinks it's such a good bet??

Where are you from J?

Sweden?

[scarp]

since when have the Seahawks played decent???? It won't be a blowout but I think the Saints can handle it

[HoulihansTX]

The Saints aint losing.

Saints will win easily.

Two very smart post in this thread.


weeding through the crap as I type.

[JosephPavs]

Hope that you pull this one off should pay good

[big0mar]

Haha, you're a fish.

That message wasn't adressed to you, but to LB. He said that we who supports NO don't understand to be profitable, but what is his record for the season?


Attention-thread. How much has LB on Seahawks ML if he thinks it's such a good bet??

What do you think the Seahawks ML should be????

[Grind House]

When they let bitch ass Lakerboy back on here?

[outrageousfun420]

What the goes through your head when think about saying that. The saints had a chance to tie the game but they took drew out. Domination would be the 31-6 beatdown that they gave yall at your house. To say that yall dominated the saints is just retarded.

[Pick'nParlays]

gnight gents. t'was a fun day. so they say. in the hay,.

[dontazeme1]

lmfao all you stupid ass broke pieces of shits nobody on this site is actually up a good amount sportsbetting, just pick and pray and hopeyou dont go brokethe next day LOLOOLOLOOOL

[IrishTim]

Interesting take. Spread a better bet imo.

[marcoloco]

hawks ml lets do it

[dfberger23]

For all those saying SEA ML is a bad bet, what % chance do you believe they have to win?

5%.

[Styles]

more like .001%..

[The J-Dizzle]

I haven't made up my mind in this game just yet. Seattle perhaps needs to put up +20 points to cover the spread, can they do it? But then again, this thread is about Seahawks ML.

Would love an analyze (an actual analyze) from the CREATOR OF THE THREAD though, and how many units LB has on Seattle ML.

Perhaps I should tail you LB, especially after that Jets-20 bet against the Pats..

[lakerboy]

I haven't made up my mind in this game just yet. Seattle perhaps needs to put up +20 points to cover the spread, can they do it? But then again, this thread is about Seahawks ML.

Would love an analyze (an actual analyze) from the CREATOR OF THE THREAD though, and how many units LB has on Seattle ML.

Perhaps I should tail you LB, especially after that Jets-20 bet against the Pats..

What is a 20 bet? What is an analyze?

I am taking the hawks ml +450 for a $100 and +10.5 for $200. You seem insistent on putting me down. And the fact that I have lost a good chunk of change in the nfl this year( mostly on 3 games). Maybe you should just make your own bets and not follow others like you usually do so when you lose the mirror in your room can be made to good use instead of the keyboard.

I already gave out my analysis. The seahawks are a shitty team so no one can give a reason on why they are going to win. I am taking a shot with them. Earlier in the year I posted a thread about the browns ml in new orleans( I Didn't bet it) and they won. Its a $100 bet so I think I will survive if they don't win. Oh btw please tell me what a 20 bet is Will Smith.

[lakerboy]

more like .001%..

Then why isn't the hawks ML +1000000?

I guess new orleans ml -600 is the safest bet in the history of sports but I don't see anyone here associating themselves with that play.

[MR.HARRYtheHAT]

When these teams met in November, a 34-19 New Orleans win in which Brees threw for 382 yards and four touchdowns,in addition to setting the all-time franchise record for completions.Brees will come close to those numbers on Saturday,as the Saints' arsenal of weapons on offense are too many for Seattle’s nondescript defense,which features an underwhelming pass rush..In spite of all of these very faint reasons for optimism, however, It’s really,really hard to imagine the Seahawks’season extending beyond next Saturday. I got down early on this one Saints -10 My Prediction ..Saints 28 Seahawks 7 If Hasselbeck starts it’s possible that the spread will drop below 10. So if you are planning on taking the Seahawks to cover, my suggestion would be to place your wager early in the week. (Either that or save your money.)Seahawks coach Pete Carroll still isn’t sure who he will start at quarterback against the Saints on Saturday.Matt Hasselbeck and Charlie Whitehurst are expected to split snaps when the teams return to practice Tuesday.