330

[HedgeHog]

Thank you for your concern Mr. Red_Sux, i really appreciate it.

But i don't think i need to quit after one loosing day. The thing is i never called myself an excellent handicapper (maybe a decent one), but what i know is i don't get emotional, get panicked, or chase.

Here, we're trying a strategy, and quite frankly I'd like to experience some bad days as well as good ones. Well, if you are 80% winner, you wouldn't need any kinds of strategy or any discipline (or any job).

Therefore, the experience will continue, and as of now; I'm (or any kind of investor in that matter) happy with the accomplishment of 64% profit in 3 days.

Best Regards.

Not true. An 80% winner can double up every time and eventually lose it all. Don't underestimate discipline; it's been the undoing of many bettors.

[The HG]

Dear SBR Forum,

I am saddened to see this negativity for Mr. MoneyMatters to loose money. He is nice and polite to come show this new strategy and allow us to discuss and consider.

He is not the kind of person to take it attacks personally, of course you can tell, so why come into this thread without open mind to see if there is better way to make money??

This is a good forum and is even better when people can come in and show profit! For me I am interested to see his picks and how he uses 1-3-2-6 Strategy. Is quite impressive so far, would you disagree?

Fondest Regards,

The HG

[B1GER1C828]

keep it up MM wishing u the best of luck

[Arnold]

He is nice and polite to come show this new strategy and allow us to discuss and consider.

Anyone, who refuses to listen to solid arguments, is disrespectful. Thus, I don't consider this man polite/nice, but very rude, selfish and stubborn.

so why come into this thread without open mind to see if there is better way to make money??

We did. Analysis and even the simplest logic showed that this is not the better way to make money.

This is a good forum and is even better when people can come in and show profit! For me I am interested to see his picks and how he uses 1-3-2-6 Strategy. Is quite impressive so far, would you disagree?

I disagree. His picks are quite good so far, but what does his strategy has to do with his picks? As I showed before, you will make the same profit using ordinary flat-betting strategy, and at the same time have a lesser chance of losing your entire bankroll. Why some do not listen? Maybe because some are very, very desperate for a profitable strategy, and will bite any crap posted on internet.

[durito]

nm

[LT Profits]

Methinks HG forget these tags:

[sarcasm]

[/sarcasm]

[Finpro]

I am saddened to see this negativity for Mr. MoneyMatters to loose money. He is nice and polite to come show this new strategy and allow us to discuss and consider.

If this is sarcasm
If not..it´s shit like this that some clueless people fall for, all betting strategys are nonsense.

[LT Profits]

Finpro,

Read my simultaneous post.

[sir.civic]

lol leave the guy alone hahahaha, jk, ive followed dis thread since he posted it,well wat i see is that MM is trying to say its a strategy,maybe it is,but is it a strategy to pick the winners n win lots of money or strategy to pick who will be the winner..well for the people who doesnt get wat he is doing is that he has a strategy on money maintenance not strategy to pick who will be the winner.some of the guys out here keeps putting it as a "system" wen all he is doin is trying to figure out how he can still make money even if he has a lose on top of the 4 picks he has.so let us jst wait til he win lots of money or lose that 330 he has.i have to give it up to him 4 or 5 straight days and he is still on the + percentage.as for the picks that he makes der all coming from his ass,and there is no strategy on that :sacrasm lol, i have to throw it out there coz some1 might flame me lol

[sir.civic]

hey LT good call on the hockey

[Red_Sux]

this stratey works really well if you tend to win 2 games in a row.

[Red_Sux]

if you tend to win 3 times in a row, use the 1-2-4 system

if you tend to win 4 times in a row, use the 1-2-4-8 system

if you tend to alternate between win and loss, then you'll win for sure with 2-1-2-1 system

i think i have a system for everyone

[LT Profits]

hey LT good call on the hockey

Actually, empty net goal at the end turner a winner into a push.

[Red_Sux]

Actually, empty net goal at the end turner a winner into a push.

i'll take a push over a loss anyday

[LT Profits]

Yeah but felt like a loss because Under was the right call and empty net ruined it.

[gizmo2431]

Yeah but felt like a loss because Under was the right call and empty net ruined it.

gotta love that

[Red_Sux]

i prefer soccer over ice soccer

[cobra_king]

Dear SBR Forum,

I am saddened to see this negativity for Mr. MoneyMatters to loose money. He is nice and polite to come show this new strategy and allow us to discuss and consider.

He is not the kind of person to take it attacks personally, of course you can tell, so why come into this thread without open mind to see if there is better way to make money??

This is a good forum and is even better when people can come in and show profit! For me I am interested to see his picks and how he uses 1-3-2-6 Strategy. Is quite impressive so far, would you disagree?

Fondest Regards,

The HG

Love it when the HG is in the zone with his sarcasm and doesn't go off the deep end like he's prone to do sometimes. Good stuff here!!

[MoneyMatters]

I'm back after took a day off. It's always good to sit back and relax after a bad day; even if it's a small one.

Some really intelligent people are following this thread and i don't think i have to praise about how important is money management, and not to chase.

Anyways, long story short, I'd like to share my first bet of the today...

Washington/Toronto - Toronto -1.5 (first quarter) ... $33.33


PS: I can not recall his name, but i remember somebody said that the picks i made all coming from my ass; well he may be right.


Good Luck

[cobra_king]

This has now become just a thread for MM to track his picks, which is fine and dandy, but clearly it is time for it to be moved out of the think tank and into the NBA forum.

[MoneyMatters]

You're right Cobra, so here is a reminder for everyone:

The 1-3-2-6 Strategy

In this money management strategy the name pretty much says it all. It is based on the idea that you CAN win 4 times in a row.

When you apply this money management system your first wager will be 1 unit, the second wager will be 3 units, the third wager will be 2 units, and the fourth wager will be 6 units.

For example, if each unit represents $20 and the odds are 1 to 1: even money. The first bet will be $20. If you win, $20 is added to the $40 on the table making the second bet $60. If you win again on your second bet, there will be $120 now on the table. From the $120 you will now remove $80 leaving the third bet to be $40. If the third bet wins again, you will now have $80 on the table. You will now add $40 to it making the fourth bet $120.

If you win again on the fourth bet, there will now be a total of $240, this is all net profit. You then take all the bet down and start the system over again at $20. Each time you lose (at any level), you will start over again with the original betting amount of $20.

Now, if you lose on your first bet, your loss will be $20. A loss on the second bet will then be $40 (remember you added another $20). If you lose again on the third bet, you will have a net profit of $40 (remember you took down $80 dollars after the second bet). On the fourth bet, a loss would leave you breaking even (remember you put back $40 of the $80 you took down).

The allure to using this system is that by risking $40 you have the chance to win $240 net profit. Basically, you can lose 12 times on a row or 6 times at the worst level of betting, and with only one win (four in a row/complete cycle) you will win your money back.

[tacomax]

if you tend to win 3 times in a row, use the 1-2-4 system

if you tend to win 4 times in a row, use the 1-2-4-8 system

if you tend to alternate between win and loss, then you'll win for sure with 2-1-2-1 system

i think i have a system for everyone

Red_Sux is SBR's resident genius.

[Louisvillekid1]

Does this really need to be in 3 fu*kin forums,

WTF

[Red_Sux]

Does this really need to be in 3 fu*kin forums,

WTF

this is cross linked.

[HedgeHog]

On the 1-3-2-6 method, do you continue on 6 units on a win? So it's 1,3,2,6,6,6....until a loss?

[Louisvillekid1]

unlink it.

or link my daily thread in 3 forums,

Im tired of looking at this in 3 forums, its just one guys picks

[HedgeHog]

unlink it.

or link my daily thread in 3 forums,

Im tired of looking at this in 3 forums, its just one guys picks

Why? The main forum has a ton of crap in it. This guy at least believes in what he says...as misguided as it may be. If you don't like it, then don't click it. Leave it be.

[Louisvillekid1]

HAs nothing to do w/ the content of the thread,

I just don't need to see it at the last thread posted in, on three different forums, when Im on the main forum viewing all the other forums.

[MoneyMatters]

On the 1-3-2-6 method, do you continue on 6 units on a win? So it's 1,3,2,6,6,6....until a loss?

Mr. HedgeHog,

After the sequence of 1-3-2-6 (in the case of 4 wins), you return to the beginning sir.

Thanks,

[MoneyMatters]

Looks like 0-1 so far.

I pick Golden State -4.5 (first half) ... 1 unit

[TLD]

Have to agree with LouisvilleKid here. Don’t see any reason for this to be in multiple fora.

Seems to fit Players Talk best. It’s just a lame picks thread. Other than the minimal entertainment value of poking fun at this “system” that has baccarat pit bosses quaking in their shoes, I’m not sure why it would be in Handicapper Think Tank.

[MoneyMatters]

Ok, Golden State covered the -4.5 with ease. (1-1)

Now the 3 unit play. If you win this, guarantee profit for the day.

Utah / Phoenix ... Phoenix -3 (first half) ... 3 units.

[MoneyMatters]

Here is the fun part. Winning a 3 unit bet, after the first winning bet. Now the 3rd step of the strategy. Free bet, win or loose, up for the day.

Let me mark the spot:

Starting Bankroll = $330 ($300 +$30 bonus)
Current Bankroll = $633 (91% profit)

[MoneyMatters]

Ok, my "free" bet is:

Phoenix -1 second half ... 2 units

[Red_Sux]

Have to agree with LouisvilleKid here. Don’t see any reason for this to be in multiple fora.

Seems to fit Players Talk best. It’s just a lame picks thread. Other than the minimal entertainment value of poking fun at this “system” that has baccarat pit bosses quaking in their shoes, I’m not sure why it would be in Handicapper Think Tank.

i think some staff at sbr think this is a brilliant system.