Umps trying their best to give game to Yanks

[Shonner]

Cano home run was fan intereference, not called.

Berkman HR was foul (they called it fair) it will be reviewed.

Good job umps, way to try to give the yanks the game

[Dirty Sanchez]

Poor bastard thinks he gets a night off umping the rightfield line...friggin guy is under assault

[Shonner]

Poor bastard thinks he gets a night off umping the rightfield line...friggin guy is under assault

He blew the Cano HR

[SamsNCharge99]

fan didn't touch the ball, ball hit the yellow line

Cano HR

Berkman correct call on foul

stop crying

[dwaechte]

Almost looked like ball grazed the pole to me. Want another look.

[Dirty Sanchez]

Nah...the ball looked over the wall before any of that fan stuff got going. They didn't even consider reviewing it...you can't believe everything the TBS flunkies are trying to sell.

[Shonner]

fan didn't touch the ball, ball hit the yellow line

Cano HR

Berkman correct call on foul

stop crying

Sammy don't start.

It was clearly interference.

Know what's best for you and go do work.

[Shonner]

Nah...the ball looked over the wall before any of that fan stuf got going. They didn't even consider reviewing it...you can't believe everything the TBS flunkies are trying to sell.

They can't review it, only fair/foul

[SamsNCharge99]

Sammy don't start. It was clearly interference. Know what's best for you and go do work.

i am, got Yanks and Cano total bases -130 over Cruz

[antifoil]

of course they are doing their best to have the yankees win


that was more interference than that defender on andre johnson

[Shonner]

i am, got Yanks and Cano total bases -130 over Cruz

Now I see why you are saying it wasn't intereference

But it was Sammy

[LT Profits]

No it was a home run because the ball was over the wall.

As long as the ball is on the other side of the fence, the fans can chop your arms off if they want, it is the same rule as reaching for a foul ball. It is not the same thing as a fan reaching over and interfering with a ball that could have been caught in the field of play.

[Shonner]

Flood gates about to open for AJ

[Shonner]

No it was a home run because the ball was over the wall.

As long as the ball is on the other side of the fence, the fans can chop your arms off if they want, it is the same rule as reaching for a foul ball. It is not the same thing as a fan reaching over and interfering with a ball that could have been caught in the field of play.

LT - you are wrong.

Cruz was interfered with before the ball was over the wall.

Watch the replay.

[Shonner]

Don't like sac bunt here. AJ struggling shouldn't have bunted.

[LT Profits]

LT - you are wrong.

Cruz was interfered with before the ball was over the wall.

Watch the replay.

It doesn't ,matter, the ball was over the wall.

For there to be interference, BOTH criteria have to be met:

1 - Fan interferes with fielder AND

2 - Ball could have been caught in field of play.

The fan probably did interfere but the ball went over the fence on a fly, making the second criterion impossible. Thus, fans had equal right to the ball, just like foul ball.

[dwaechte]

You're blind if you don't think the ball was on top of the wall by the time Cruz had any chance of touching it.

I still think ball might've grazed the pole on Berkman's HR

[drfunkmaster]

does it matter rangers still gonna win..

[nosniboR11]

its ok rangers are calm and have taken it, we will get this game

[nosniboR11]

6 more outs

[l7ustin]

he woulda caught in the field of play if the guy didnt reach over the fence and smack his glove...it was hit higher than the fence but it WOULD have been caught IN THE FIELD OF PLAY if the guy didnt touch his mit. he wasnt trying to reach over the fence just wanted to jump high and make the catch but they crawled over the fence and interfered with his ability to do that

[JMobile]

Only way to fight against the Umps is to go for the long ball.