I guarantee the Lions beat the Packers on Sunday

[2daBank]

Not sure what you're saying since you bounce back and forth but

Detroit is going to shove the running game down GB throats? What Detroit team have you been watching for the last 10 years, one from a different universe?

seems clear to me,, when you take a 12 yard sack your "great" passing gm is gonna have a hard time continually moving the ball.. the same det team that last season went for damn near 250 yards on the ground with bell and bush in this gm.. the same pack run d that allows 176 per gm at almost 5 per carry.. yea seems so outlandish to suggest they can run on the pack huh?

[slacker00]

Not sure what you're saying since you bounce back and forth but

Detroit is going to shove the running game down GB throats? What Detroit team have you been watching for the last 10 years, one from a different universe?

Why do people keep bringing up 10 years ago, 4 years ago, etc? These aren't the 2010 GB or 2008 DET teams playing.

[2daBank]

Why do people keep bringing up 10 years ago, 4 years ago, etc? These aren't the 2010 GB or 2008 DET teams playing.

oh well creates value on det,, blowdogs square asses have det-1, ill take it.. i think bell has a really big gm here,, there run gm hasnt been good as of yet but last week who didnt know panthers were gonna play really good d at home? luckily packers play no such d, i think caldwell would prefer a more balanced attack and everything ive heard is he favors bell..

[StackinGreen]

seems clear to me,, when you take a 12 yard sack your "great" passing gm is gonna have a hard time continually moving the ball.. the same det team that last season went for damn near 250 yards on the ground with bell and bush in this gm.. the same pack run d that allows 176 per gm at almost 5 per carry.. yea seems so outlandish to suggest they can run on the pack huh?

You could be right but there is no reason to believe it. The Lions problem is that they haven't been able to run the ball. You quoting a blowout game last year without Rodgers is irrelevant and if that's what you're basing anything on, a fool and his money will soon part. They ran it well that game precisely because Rodgers was out and the GB offense could muster little to nothing, meaning the D was on the field a LONG time. By the way, if you haven't noticed, Rodgers is the best QB in the game.

Why do people keep bringing up 10 years ago, 4 years ago, etc? These aren't the 2010 GB or 2008 DET teams playing.

Trends and history matter because the team has been built around passing and not rushing. While that may change, the issue is the style of offense and the personnel. My point is significant as a matter of fact and style.

[Big Bear]

I needed more reasons to be on the Packers. Thanks.

to go too big pal.

i'd hate for ya to beating romen noodles for a week

[2daBank]

[QUOTE=StackinGreen;22639467]You could be right but there is no reason to believe it. The Lions problem is that they haven't been able to run the ball. You quoting a blowout game last year without Rodgers is irrelevant and if that's what you're basing anything on, a fool and his money will soon part. They ran it well that game precisely because Rodgers was out and the GB offense could muster little to nothing, meaning the D was on the field a LONG time. By the way, if you haven't noticed, Rodgers is the best QB in the game.[QUOTE=StackinGreen;22639467]



there is plenty to base it off but hey i guess you smarter than me..if you havnt noticed he doesnt play d and everyone runs on the pack, guess you aint notice his oline is crap either. but whatever im a fool and you something real special. keep telling yourself that pal.

[Big Bear]

2dafoodbank think he tough bc he sat in a holding cell for a few hours lol

suck a dikk bitch fade the Lions at your own risk

[convick]

to go too big pal.

i'd hate for ya to beating romen noodles for a week

Something youre used to.

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/saloon/2941031-125-start-what-easiest-way-turn-into-50-000-a.html#post22436143

[Vegas39]

Something youre used to.

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/foru...l#post22436143

with seaweed banned bear now biggest fraud on this site

[Vinnie Paz]

Wait seaweed is banned? For what?

[Vegas39]

Wait seaweed is banned? For what?

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/2961341-russian-rocket-post-video-yourself-picture-holding-sign-i-leave-sbr.html

[Russian Rocket]

Bear clear your head son and you'll do alright

[StackinGreen]

[QUOTE=2daBank;22639547][QUOTE=StackinGreen;22639467]You could be right but there is no reason to believe it. The Lions problem is that they haven't been able to run the ball. You quoting a blowout game last year without Rodgers is irrelevant and if that's what you're basing anything on, a fool and his money will soon part. They ran it well that game precisely because Rodgers was out and the GB offense could muster little to nothing, meaning the D was on the field a LONG time. By the way, if you haven't noticed, Rodgers is the best QB in the game.

there is plenty to base it off but hey i guess you smarter than me..if you havnt noticed he doesnt play d and everyone runs on the pack, guess you aint notice his oline is crap either. but whatever im a fool and you something real special. keep telling yourself that pal.

Just so we're clear, what's your prediction on this game?

[LethalPicks]

Yep. Bear is right on money on this one. Everyone pounding GB + money and books keep giving them.

[slacker00]

Trends and history matter because the team has been built around passing and not rushing. While that may change, the issue is the style of offense and the personnel. My point is significant as a matter of fact and style.

I have no idea what this means. Sounds like a bunch of buzzwords strung together by a postmodern dialogue generator.

[Hot Jerry]

LOVE GB + points and Seattle ML only !!

[StackinGreen]

I have no idea what this means. Sounds like a bunch of buzzwords strung together by a postmodern dialogue generator.

You don't know it means because you don't know the NFL or the Detroit Lions.

They pass but can't run consistently, or, at all. It's the way their management has built the team. Very simple and straight to the point to someone who knows anything about the game.

[RickyRoma]

anyone putting there money on the lions should donate to a charity cause, its a more noble way to spend money, give the lions +7 at home and i still wont take them its packers or no play

[slacker00]

You don't know it means because you don't know the NFL or the Detroit Lions.

They pass but can't run consistently, or, at all. It's the way their management has built the team. Very simple and straight to the point to someone who knows anything about the game.

But the Lions management has changed since 10 years ago. Matt Millen is long gone.

By NFL standards, Lions running game is about average, not great not terrible.

[2daBank]

[QUOTE=StackinGreen;22639691][QUOTE=2daBank;22639547]

You could be right but there is no reason to believe it. The Lions problem is that they haven't been able to run the ball. You quoting a blowout game last year without Rodgers is irrelevant and if that's what you're basing anything on, a fool and his money will soon part. They ran it well that game precisely because Rodgers was out and the GB offense could muster little to nothing, meaning the D was on the field a LONG time. By the way, if you haven't noticed, Rodgers is the best QB in the game.

Just so we're clear, what's your prediction on this game?

that after it over you still be down 50 or so make believe units, or 10 dollar units, whatever. not very bold i know..

honestly i played det in btp and took them in office pools, far as betting it i put det-1 in a parlay with cardinals tonight risking like .75 of a unit. love the value of joique bell in daily fantasy leagues. gun to head on the score i have it something like 31-20 det but i dont exactly trust det all that much cause they bout as dyslexic as it comes and i think there better games. so if it makes you feel good write me down for that, but not like i give a flying fukk. after it over you can come back and brag or ignore the thread like i will either way. gl big time

[Chili_Powder]

Packers offense is lost. Thought the injury to the center was something they could maybe overcome then Bulaga went down and it was over. They have NO RECIEVERS in G.B. When Jordy Nelson is your best option to throw to, you dont have a good receiving core. Rodgers was real good with Jennings, Driver, and Finley. Hasn't done shit with any a the guys he has now. Also he isnt hungry like he was when he wanted to prove everybody wrong, that he had a better arm and was smarter than Favre then he did and is just going through the motions now. Dom capers D is also beyond predictable to the other teams in the NFC.

I think the Lions win tomorrow. After reading your analysis however, I think the lock of the week is that you have shite for brains. Nelson is a stud, and Cobb is pretty decent.

[2daBank]

But the Lions management has changed since 10 years ago. Matt Millen is long gone.

By NFL standards, Lions running game is about average, not great not terrible.

so far this year if anything it been below avg, they do have 2 quality rbs tho and a offense that should force defenses to play favorable fronts to run on, from what ive seen of caldwell calling plays i think he would prefer to be more balanced and has the pieces to do so. then of coarse there the ultimate reason det can, should, and will run in this gm. packs run d is god awful and why the fukk wouldnt you run? make life easier on your defense by keeping rodgers on the sideline..

[BIGDAY]

Bear, you'll need some luck.

[Hot Jerry]

anyone putting there money on the lions should donate to a charity cause, its a more noble way to spend money, give the lions +7 at home and i still wont take them its packers or no play

- ur so very right !! lol

[Vinnie Paz]

I look at this game and all I see is 60+ points.

[StackinGreen]

[QUOTE=2daBank;22641321][QUOTE=StackinGreen;22639691]

that after it over you still be down 50 or so make believe units, or 10 dollar units, whatever. not very bold i know..

honestly i played det in btp and took them in office pools, far as betting it i put det-1 in a parlay with cardinals tonight risking like .75 of a unit. love the value of joique bell in daily fantasy leagues. gun to head on the score i have it something like 31-20 det but i dont exactly trust det all that much cause they bout as dyslexic as it comes and i think there better games. so if it makes you feel good write me down for that, but not like i give a flying fukk. after it over you can come back and brag or ignore the thread like i will either way. gl big time

I don't get you. If you don't care, why post? I also think you have been trying to be a nemesis in the past, if I recall your name. Could be wrong, but I believe you've come up on the short side of many packer covers for me, just sayin'

Also, funny how you mention 50u or whatever, it's week 3 dude.

I've been the top documented capper here for 4 years

[meader99]

[QUOTE=StackinGreen;22642895][QUOTE=2daBank;22641321]

I don't get you. If you don't care, why post? I also think you have been trying to be a nemesis in the past, if I recall your name. Could be wrong, but I believe you've come up on the short side of many packer covers for me, just sayin'

Also, funny how you mention 50u or whatever, it's week 3 dude.

I've been the top documented capper here for 4 years

He's a Bear fan..... It's in his dna to hate the Packers.

[WWWBUKTN]

I may be a Bears fan (who bet against them in week one and for them last week) but on my life the game that first caught my eye this week was this one. I have liked Detroit all week long and I'm going to roll with them today. I just don't think that the Packers can stop their full offensive attack in the dome. While I'm more of a dog bettor in this case I'm going to lay the points.

[chrisander625]

...

I think the over is a safer play than trying to pick a side. If I had to choose I would take the Lions but I think there are much better games to play. You never know which Lions team will show, and there is no way they get held to 10 points again. Also we all know GB can score

[Hot Jerry]

Easy money - GB [ +2.5 ] - EASY MONEY !! NFL is giving us a FREE MONEY TODAY with this game !! So be nice and after the game send a thank u card to NFL headquarters - LOL

[Itsamazing777]

No jeryy. Lions ml today

[zacher]

Games gonna be a tight one..the line is now at +1 Bovada….too close for me for pick I would've jumped on GB +2.5…..

This one is gonna be a shootout coming down to the wire.

expect big plays from Megatron and Bush for Detroit


but look towards Rodgers to create plays with his arm top receiver tonight will be Cobb but Nelson is always a big play target..

Player props here should be looked into..

- Total Receiving yards for Randall Cobb OVER 64.5
- Will Eddie Lacy Score a TD in this game? YES -115
- Total Receptions Eddie Lacy OVER 2.5



Just a thought.

[2daBank]

Games gonna be a tight one..the line is now at +1 Bovada….too close for me for pick I would've jumped on GB +2.5…..

This one is gonna be a shootout coming down to the wire.

expect big plays from Megatron and Bush for Detroit


but look towards Rodgers to create plays with his arm top receiver tonight will be Cobb but Nelson is always a big play target..

Player props here should be looked into..

- Total Receiving yards for Randall Cobb OVER 64.5
- Will Eddie Lacy Score a TD in this game? YES -115
- Total Receptions Eddie Lacy OVER 2.5



Just a thought.

even tho im on det i really hope lacy gets going for sake of my fantasy team

i like joique bell to be the rb doing work today cause you can run against pack between the tackles with that big gap left by raji,, obviously there gonna be points in this one but i think it sneaks under the total with a little more running by det than expected juicing some clock..another reason id like lacy to get off..

[zacher]

even tho im on det i really hope lacy gets going for sake of my fantasy team

With ya there I need him to blow up this week he has under performed the first 2 weeks but I am expecting him to absolutely show out sometime soon…just depends how soon he wants to come play some football.

[zacher]

oh BTW last thing I am on..


First Player from Packers to score a TD --- Eddie Lacy is 5/2 OR Aaron Rodgers 20/1 -- Dropped $20 on Rodgers.

My thoughts behind this I am convinced the Packers will have a big play come up short 5 yrds or in.
They will either:
A - Score on First down when they hand the ball off to Lacy
B - Not score on First try to Throw on 2nd, Rodgers ends up scrambling because of the pressure from the interior line and scores with his feet.