The books have said it with their live odds. Rangers are done
-
-
Haha rangers right off with a penalty. Right on cue. The books are never wrongComment -
nhl is not rigged line means nothing,this is not nbaOriginally posted by godukeComment -
What a stupid penaltyComment -
Game tied at 2 going to OT yet live line at most shops was rangers -140 when it opened much higher. All sports are rigged pal just nba is more blatant with itComment -
I say the Rangers win this OTComment -
I need this habs winOriginally posted by jjgoldComment -
Lol, the NBA and NHL are not rigged.Originally posted by godukeComment -
Kid is too short, they rip that short side on him so easilyComment -
NBA isn't rigged..... LOL poor guy, obliviousOriginally posted by akphideltComment -
Of course it's not rigged. Just dudes playing ball at a high level. You have Gamblers Paranoia.Originally posted by DeolComment -
What do I know lol oh wellComment -
Dominated beginning of that OT.. And one shot kills emComment -
MartttyyyyyComment -
OopsComment -
Fuk you smoking Suhn????Originally posted by godukeComment -
You're done u fkn scumbag, now don't come back.Originally posted by godukeComment -
Originally posted by Simon Gruber
Comment -
Ferocious fore check nets the Rangers the win. Very well done!Comment -
I would love to see your flawless picks. get angry much? Why dont you go take it out on your wife and kids there spaz?Originally posted by Simon GruberComment -
After these playoffs, I don't know how you hockey guys can say that shit with a straight face.Originally posted by bruins35
Some of the fcked up calls don't directly lead to points, so it's hard to rig but there is absolutely favoritism with agendas from the higher ups in the NHL.Comment -
Originally posted by Cuse0323
Ok east if crookedComment -
I just think in low scoring sports like Hockey and Baseball, it's more difficult to see the subtle things or just looked past. Refs/Umps fck teams over in every sport. Hockey is no different but luckily the players still decide the game for the most part. Can give a team all the PP's in the world and they still may not score. Call a shady strike zone and it may not matter. Along with that, rigging is rough because of it. Can't give teams points.Originally posted by Vegas39Comment -
lumquist is solid n good but so is the montr backup..they over rate lumpquist as the next bernie parent..not. So in both home games they went to ot..one team each won...like i said over n over..there is little to no difference between the nhl teams..Comment -
strongly disagree with the remarks about nhl higher ups wanting or trying to influence the ref calls/games..if that were true..it would of been found out and a huge lawsuit started and settled.Comment -
NYR were up 2-0 and go home and both of those games goes ot vs a backup goalie...lololololComment -
don't be suprised if this goes 7 gamesComment -
It happens blatantly in most professional leagues...no lawsuits will ever come about. I'm not sure if I even believe it myself when it comes to NHL but they sure do make some subjective calls on one side and not the other, at times.Originally posted by nyplayer33Comment -
Being a ref is hard, you act like they are computers. All calls are subjective. Most of those Rangers penalties were just stupid penalties that should have been called.Originally posted by Cuse0323Comment -
I respect refs more than most and have no problem with tonight's game really...Game 3 on the other hand, meh. Thing about tonight is the penalties were blatant and deserved, but the Habs still felt the need to embellish on most of them. I'm still bitter about the Rangers getting two embellishment penalties in one game against the Flyers but haven't seen an embellishment call since then.Originally posted by akphideltComment -
Why would any one team or owner bring a lawsuit against these leagues. It's a cash cow. In the end business owners care more about money than winning. All sports are fixed it's just to what extend.
Like someone said what's the distinct advantage Rangers had to warrant -140 odds start of OT. If they were that better would they not have won earlier. Always always assume books know more than bettors. They are in that business for a reasonComment -
The backup goalie you called solid and good in post 24.Originally posted by nyplayer33Comment -
good attitude. u had a 50/50 shot and lost oh well. but it was unlikely the habs were gonna win twice in a row in ny in ot.Originally posted by godukeComment -
What's funny, is that in a (generally) 50/50 proposition, you wouldn't nearly be as contrite had Montreal won.Originally posted by goduke
It'd be all about how the books knew...the league planned it...
Instead, it's "oh well".
And people wonder why Touts still exist and flourish?
"Trust me, my sources tell me which side the league needs in tonight's game. Stop guessing and go with a guy with proven connections who already knows how this one ends!!!!"Comment -
how do you know what I would or would not do. Way to troll this thread a full day later. I was wrong, have you always been right? You've never had opinions of a game. The line before ot was -140 or lower for the rangers. Thats 35+ less then the opening line so I thought the books thought montreal would win. I was wrong what else would you like me to say. go find some more dead threads and make commentsOriginally posted by muldoonComment
