Originally <a href='http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/showthread.php?p=24406423'>posted</a> on 08/20/2015:
Never claimed it did, but you're more likely to find wisdom in many words than fewer...and what i wrote is pretty spot on; any points in there you'd care to disagree with? Can you explain why no face implies terrorism? I can't even guess why it would
Mikey, young people are being "radicalized" by the quran about the same way others are being "radicalized" by the other abrahamic religions with god's chosen people slaughtering everyone in their path: not even in the slightest, as the version of religions taught today rarely takes a literal interpretation of their sources. You know what just might be radicalizing young people though? Killing their innocent family members, which we've been doing for the better part of a decade with drones.
Got a link to this celebration of pacos, or where he advocates for more of the same? Or anything that would lead a reasonable person to believe he'd shoot them for shits and giggles?
Our drones don't pinpoint shit, and those 'minimal losses" are about 50 innocents for every suspected terrorist. That's not convicted, proven terrorist; that's "suspected", as in "we think they might be a bad guy, so let's blow up their house with their family in there, then bomb the funeral to kill more of their family". Fight ISIS? We not only encouraged them but armed them, the same way we've created our own enemies in the region time and time again. If you want to blame anyone for destabilizing the region to the point where radical groups can rise up and gain support, look no further than the US of A (and I'm not just talking the Bush years; as bad as Bush was, Obama's administration has put more women and children in graves than Bush ever did and is continuing the same policies).
Maybe I'm missing the boat on paco, but I've seen nothing to indicate he relishes the deaths of innocents. Not likely to change my mind without some evidence of that.
Never claimed it did, but you're more likely to find wisdom in many words than fewer...and what i wrote is pretty spot on; any points in there you'd care to disagree with? Can you explain why no face implies terrorism? I can't even guess why it would

Mikey, young people are being "radicalized" by the quran about the same way others are being "radicalized" by the other abrahamic religions with god's chosen people slaughtering everyone in their path: not even in the slightest, as the version of religions taught today rarely takes a literal interpretation of their sources. You know what just might be radicalizing young people though? Killing their innocent family members, which we've been doing for the better part of a decade with drones.
Got a link to this celebration of pacos, or where he advocates for more of the same? Or anything that would lead a reasonable person to believe he'd shoot them for shits and giggles?
Our drones don't pinpoint shit, and those 'minimal losses" are about 50 innocents for every suspected terrorist. That's not convicted, proven terrorist; that's "suspected", as in "we think they might be a bad guy, so let's blow up their house with their family in there, then bomb the funeral to kill more of their family". Fight ISIS? We not only encouraged them but armed them, the same way we've created our own enemies in the region time and time again. If you want to blame anyone for destabilizing the region to the point where radical groups can rise up and gain support, look no further than the US of A (and I'm not just talking the Bush years; as bad as Bush was, Obama's administration has put more women and children in graves than Bush ever did and is continuing the same policies).
Maybe I'm missing the boat on paco, but I've seen nothing to indicate he relishes the deaths of innocents. Not likely to change my mind without some evidence of that.