100 unit play daily thread

WestsidePete · 01-30-09, 01:29 AM

You should only be able to find 100 unit plays maybe a couple times a week tops ...

khaliagent · 01-30-09, 01:38 AM

i am playing on my best capping skills and the one pick i make will be worth it

MJ · 01-30-09, 07:12 AM

How much is 1 unit for you Khaliagent? Because for me 1 unit is $200. And I am pretty sure i won't be betting $20,000 on your pick today.

I am not trying to start anything with you because I do feel you are a decent handicapper. But are these really 100 unit plays? For me a 100 unit play should only lose like 10% of the time.

jayc88 · 01-30-09, 07:32 AM

he's betting 10 000 on one game every day ,
what a joke

hockeytown11 · 01-30-09, 11:33 AM

he is a tool,come join me on my 23,450 unit play of the day,im starting that thread soon,1 unit for me is 3,332.75

mmike032 · 01-30-09, 11:35 AM

1u = $1

curious · 01-30-09, 11:37 AM

Originally posted by khaliagent

each day i will supply a 100 unit play
1-0 today with orlando

Assuming a scale of 1 unit to 100 units, a 100 unit play should happen maybe 2 or 3 times a month.

curious · 01-30-09, 11:40 AM

What is 1 unit for you Kali?

1 unit for me is $100. I see 100 unit plays maybe 2 or 3 times a month. Because the probability of those plays has to be > 90%.

So, for you what is 1 unit?

wild willy · 01-30-09, 11:56 AM

No. I would have to disagree, what he's betting unit wise dosen't matter .He's a yopung gun and I think you should listen. Everbody bets the old boys and guess what they suck .They give a pick with no explanation. why because they have more posts. Fuvk you. If you have noticed which you haven't, the young guns includeding myself have been ripping it up. Lt and no reasearch ,I'm a fuvkin tout picks ,suck,JJ is of the ****in map He hasen't made good picks in how long.Look at the guys that don't give a shit about records and care about the bank roll. There's a half a dozen new guy's that don't give a shit about the old guys post's .And are actually here to make money. I don't see the old guys making 2nd half picks or ripping it up .If you disagre go back and see the posts. there are people here that want to win. That don't give a shit about politics, what your doing ,stupid ****in videoes, or a top ten list. were here for one reason to win. You don't care to readthe post's **** you. I know for fact there's a couple of guys with less then 200 posts that Know more then you retardes. **** your parlays and teasers,give us info we can work with. The young guns don't don't give a **** about what you'er doing. we care about the games tonight.

OC · 01-30-09, 12:09 PM

While I do agree with part of your post Willy, did someone hide your meds again? The old guard has been successful for years. Young guns may have some decent insight but I wanna see it play out over time with some decent money management. Going 10 and 1 doesn't quite work for me if I win 10 - 1 units plays and dump on the 10 unit. Anyway, that was some funny sh*t Willy.

wild willy · 01-30-09, 12:25 PM

That's fine you will see . There is not to often you see info from the old boys, Why probally because there working for SBR or are ****ing tout. you see you have to read between the lines. If you you go to the home page you'll see LT LOSERS predictions. Do you think he got there because of is Knowlrdge of NBA or the CBB game. The ****er bets hockey thats all you should Know .I would think not. JJ bets a half million a night and never wins. There is a lot of guys that talk shit. I'll I suggest you working with the guys that have your best interest.

OC · 01-30-09, 12:37 PM

Like I said Willy ... don't completely disagree with you. Just came off a little harsh. There's always a lot to learn from both sides. GL Willy.

wild willy · 01-30-09, 12:40 PM

Fair enough. Good luck

chrisharvard01 · 01-30-09, 12:43 PM

In unrelated news, I downed a bottle of Jack Daniels after STMARY blew that half time lead.

wild willy · 01-30-09, 12:47 PM

In unrealtated news .I'v called LT a tout before and he'd never denied it. That would make you think . Would he not save his best pick's for someone who pays?

50lipa · 01-30-09, 01:08 PM

Originally posted by chrisharvard01

In unrelated news, I downed a bottle of Jack Daniels after STMARY blew that half time lead.

jaymac82980 · 01-30-09, 03:44 PM

khaliagent buys his picks anyways. and he drinks pee.

curious · 01-30-09, 05:04 PM

Originally posted by wild willy

In unrealtated news .I'v called LT a tout before and he'd never denied it. That would make you think . Would he not save his best pick's for someone who pays?

LT sells picks. He does not hide that fact. I have bought LT's picks in the past. Most of the picks he sells he posts here for free. That is the main reason that I stopped buying them.

The idea that a handicapper could know which picks will win and which picks won't win and hold back the winning picks for only a select few is completely retarded. Anyone who could predict winners with THAT level of precision would be a multi-millionaire and wouldn't need to come to this forum and bother with us losers.

curious · 01-30-09, 05:04 PM

Originally posted by jaymac82980

khaliagent buys his picks anyways. and he drinks pee.

Actually, he doesn't buy them, he steals copyrighted service picks which are being posted illegally on RX.

Vonnegut · 01-30-09, 05:11 PM

Originally posted by curious

Actually, he doesn't buy them, he steals copyrighted service picks which are being posted illegally on RX.

And anyone who makes a living "selling picks" on the internet deserves just that.

curious · 01-30-09, 05:14 PM

Originally posted by Vonnegut

And anyone who makes a living "selling picks" on the internet deserves just that.

Why? What is inherently wrong in selling picks? As long as the handicapper is honest about his record. I see nothing wrong with it.

Vonnegut · 01-30-09, 05:16 PM

Originally posted by curious

Why? What is inherently wrong in selling picks? As long as the handicapper is honest about his record. I see nothing wrong with it.

I have no problem with people selling picks. I have a problem with the claim that said picks are "copyright" protected. How can you copyright a prediction?

curious · 01-30-09, 05:34 PM

Originally posted by Vonnegut

I have no problem with people selling picks. I have a problem with the claim that said picks are "copyright" protected. How can you copyright a prediction?

It isn't a claim. A handicapper does have a copyright to their picks.

You can copyright anything that is your creative content. And you can take civil and criminal legal action against anyone who violates your copyright.

To publicize a handicappers picks so that others can get them for free instead of buying them is a form of theft and fraud.

Vonnegut · 01-30-09, 05:37 PM

Originally posted by curious

It isn't a claim. A handicapper does have a copyright to their picks.

You can copyright anything that is your creative content. And you can take civil and criminal legal action against anyone who violates your copyright.

To publicize a handicappers picks so that others can get them for free instead of buying them is a form of theft and fraud.

No it isn't. What "original idea" (which was the basis of copyright law before SHYSTER lawyers came along) comes from analyzing public information and then picking the winning team based on that information? Where is the creative content?

notmymariners · 01-30-09, 05:45 PM

I'm anticipating this devolving into an argument over neoliberal ideals of incentive based motives against neoMarxist ideals of the common good.

Vonnegut · 01-30-09, 05:48 PM

Originally posted by notmymariners

I'm anticipating this devolving into an argument over neoliberal ideals of incentive based motives against neoMarxist ideals of the common good.

Well, curious is actually technically correct about the law. But the law is an ass, as they say. It was made so because shyster lawyers twisted everything good about common and tort law into the mess of a "legal system" we have today.

Lets hammer the books ladies and gentleman!

curious · 01-30-09, 10:47 PM

Originally posted by Vonnegut

No it isn't. What "original idea" (which was the basis of copyright law before SHYSTER lawyers came along) comes from analyzing public information and then picking the winning team based on that information? Where is the creative content?

You just made my point for me. The analysis and the prediction are the creative content.

Copyright protection is in the US Constitution. Has nothing to do with "SHYSTER" lawyers.

MJ · 01-30-09, 11:04 PM

The copyright is not on the actual pick. The copyright is the "content" that was written to explain the pick that was posted.

dob08 · 01-30-09, 11:52 PM

I wanna know what happened to write ups on games. Last season it seemed like there was more info given on why picks were solid. This year it just seems like people throw out some games to play. I wish we would get back to write ups with statistics. Anyone agree?

jaymac82980 · 01-31-09, 12:09 AM

I agree that buying picks is ok. But posting those "paid for picks" is wrong. especially when you are quoting word for word, and saying who those pics came from. That is stealing food off of someone's table. Someone that sells picks may be an ass, and those picks may be bad, or good, that doesn't matter. the fact is, they are selling that advice, and when some sh*thead posts them for free-word for word, that sh*thead is stealing from the paid for service. Machine is posting "paid for picks", but he isn't saying where they are from, so it isn't technically stealling business from the REAL poster. and by the way, yes, machine buys those pics. Now, I have lost respect for him trying to call those pics his - but that is besides the point....the point is, Khaliagent drinks his own pee.

dob08 · 01-31-09, 12:25 AM

Originally posted by jaymac82980

I agree that buying picks is ok. But posting those "paid for picks" is wrong. especially when you are quoting word for word, and saying who those pics came from. That is stealing food off of someone's table. Someone that sells picks may be an ass, and those picks may be bad, or good, that doesn't matter. the fact is, they are selling that advice, and when some sh*thead posts them for free-word for word, that sh*thead is stealing from the paid for service. Machine is posting "paid for picks", but he isn't saying where they are from, so it isn't technically stealling business from the REAL poster. and by the way, yes, machine buys those pics. Now, I have lost respect for him trying to call those pics his - but that is besides the point....the point is, Khaliagent drinks his own pee.

How do you know he is buying them???

curious · 01-31-09, 02:02 AM

The Kali dude never posted a pick.....

We spent all this time arguing and the Kali dude never posted a pick.

infamousdx · 01-31-09, 02:13 AM

maybe 1 unit = $1 and 1 day = 3 days... so i expect his pick on Sunday, lol

OC · 01-31-09, 06:06 AM

"Sitting in for Khaliagent is OC"

Sorry for the delay my brethren but here we go. Ummm I had the Celtics, Lakers, Cavaliers, and any back assward college team that is stuck playing on Friday night when no one else plays ... Oh yeah and the Bulls even thought they suck and won for the first time against the Kings since MJ was in the womb. I called it all for 100 dimes each.

Good thing is I actually had those straight up (short of the back assward college plays) and Toronto kicked me in the arse on a 5 teamer. Oh well, good night anyway. Khali you know I'm just fekken with you, where the fek was your pick?