i have been thinking about this over the offseason.
seems at least two teams with too many good or potentially very good big men: philly and orlando. philly has nothing but big man talent. orlando is very very crowded in front court AND needs minutes for aaron gordon to develop
teams that come to mind with too much/many good smaller players or potential: chicago, indiana, phoenix??, minnesota - although they obviously has towns already -, milwaukee (middleton injury complicates this), toronto?? LAL?
a few historical examples i think have been cleared out like NOP and LAC.
also, in both cases - big and small - it also has to do with players that don't mesh that well together.
any thoughts or other examples? just did it off top of head. and sometimes it's just mismatches as opposed to players necessarily being very good - indiana with teague, ellis and george comes to mind. chicago with rondo/butler/wade too.
seems at least two teams with too many good or potentially very good big men: philly and orlando. philly has nothing but big man talent. orlando is very very crowded in front court AND needs minutes for aaron gordon to develop
teams that come to mind with too much/many good smaller players or potential: chicago, indiana, phoenix??, minnesota - although they obviously has towns already -, milwaukee (middleton injury complicates this), toronto?? LAL?
a few historical examples i think have been cleared out like NOP and LAC.
also, in both cases - big and small - it also has to do with players that don't mesh that well together.
any thoughts or other examples? just did it off top of head. and sometimes it's just mismatches as opposed to players necessarily being very good - indiana with teague, ellis and george comes to mind. chicago with rondo/butler/wade too.