Wallco NHL GOLD (+453 units in 6 years)

[Husker36]

Just be careful. These are SYSTEM plays, not something to hop in and out of. You may get lucky and catch a few wins, but if you hit a few losses and don't see the series through, you could be doing yourself a great disservice.

I gotcha. I like what I see and plan to tail consistently

[Wallco99]

I gotcha. I like what I see and plan to tail consistently

Great to have you aboard. Just keep in mind, NHL series losses can get expensive, so wager accordingly. Don't go for the big hits in here, slow steady returns is the name of the game.

[KC Needs Hockey]

The Minnesota vs Chicago game both fit into the system does that mean that we just pass?

[Wallco99]

The Minnesota vs Chicago game both fit into the system does that mean that we just pass?

Plays are listed in post #2727. Don't know how you came up with Chicago or play skips.

[Maxi_EV]

Let's hope Washington covers....I fat fingered my bet and added an extra digit.

[KC Needs Hockey]

Plays are listed in post #2727. Don't know how you came up with Chicago or play skips.

Hand Palm to Forehead.... I even double checked to make sure that I wasn't missing anything. Just a heads up 5dimes has Washington @ +1.5 -225 which is slightly less juiced than all other sides.

[Yoinkerz]

i got pinny has wash -1.5 for -215 :P:P:P

[Grinder12000]

Sort of off topic but it's Chase related. Ever since Wallco put the term "chase" into my head I've been looking for ways to fix problems with chases and why some work and some done.

What I like about THIS Chase is that ALL teams are used. SO - After following Stiflers MLB Chase I was seeing flaws not with winning but with the huge losses. After charting the entire league I think I have figured out a MLB Chase that cut's the losses out of the picture while giving a shit load of units!

I just had to tell SOMEBODY (my wife oddly does not understand my joy in numbers).

Sorry Wallco - back to NHL!!

[J.M. Disciple]

What is this method that cuts the losses out of chases? I think stifler tried to do that also taking the best pitchers, teams, etc with his system and make it into a system. His back test looked flawless, but we all know how the season ended.

How do you suggest we cut our losses on these big chases?

[torontovigilante]

i got pinny has wash -1.5 for -215 :P:P:P

Not possible as Wash has a huge return to cover the reverse puckline:

The line is : WASH -1.5 +372

[torontovigilante]

Thanks Walco, I'm taking Pitts ML -177 for the win. Can't see them losing 4 in a row. If they do, I'll bet a few more games on them to win since my bankroll should be able to handle it.

Pittsburgh Penguins +1.5 -470 = too rich for my liking, especially on the road with all the weird games going on this season.

[torontovigilante]

Sort of off topic but it's Chase related. Ever since Wallco put the term "chase" into my head I've been looking for ways to fix problems with chases and why some work and some done.

What I like about THIS Chase is that ALL teams are used. SO - After following Stiflers MLB Chase I was seeing flaws not with winning but with the huge losses. After charting the entire league I think I have figured out a MLB Chase that cut's the losses out of the picture while giving a shit load of units!

I just had to tell SOMEBODY (my wife oddly does not understand my joy in numbers).

Sorry Wallco - back to NHL!!

Hey there.....so I guess we'll see your MLB system come April next year?

[Wallco99]

Sort of off topic but it's Chase related. Ever since Wallco put the term "chase" into my head I've been looking for ways to fix problems with chases and why some work and some done.

What I like about THIS Chase is that ALL teams are used. SO - After following Stiflers MLB Chase I was seeing flaws not with winning but with the huge losses. After charting the entire league I think I have figured out a MLB Chase that cut's the losses out of the picture while giving a shit load of units!

I just had to tell SOMEBODY (my wife oddly does not understand my joy in numbers).

Sorry Wallco - back to NHL!!

I can relate, I love numbers.

[Wallco99]

Thanks Walco, I'm taking Pitts ML -177 for the win. Can't see them losing 4 in a row. If they do, I'll bet a few more games on them to win since my bankroll should be able to handle it.

Pittsburgh Penguins +1.5 -470 = too rich for my liking, especially on the road with all the weird games going on this season.

You really must read my posts completely. The play for tonight is Pittsburgh (M/L). No where at all did I ever say to play +1 1/2 on Pittsburgh.

[torontovigilante]

You really must read my posts completely. The play for tonight is Pittsburgh (M/L). No where at all did I ever say to play +1 1/2 on Pittsburgh.
_______________________

Wallco, I know you didn't post that as a play... This was a comment towards myself who has been playing NHL +1.5's even before your system. There are some cappers out there who love to buy insurance, and that would be too rich, even if I wanted that extra cushion. I was thinking out loud towards myself. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

[Wallco99]

You really must read my posts completely. The play for tonight is Pittsburgh (M/L). No where at all did I ever say to play +1 1/2 on Pittsburgh.
_______________________

Wilco, I know you didn't post that as a play... This was a comment towards myself who has been playing NHL +1.5's even before your system. There are some cappers out there who love to buy insurance, and that would be too rich, even if I wanted that extra cushion. I was thinking out loud towards myself. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

Oh, OK. I thought you read my post wrong. Just wanted to make sure you understood the system. Wallco.

[ZdenoK]

You really must read my posts completely. The play for tonight is Pittsburgh (M/L). No where at all did I ever say to play +1 1/2 on Pittsburgh.
_______________________

Wilco, I know you didn't post that as a play... This was a comment towards myself who has been playing NHL +1.5's even before your system. There are some cappers out there who love to buy insurance, and that would be too rich, even if I wanted that extra cushion. I was thinking out loud towards myself. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

I think you should really pay more attention and respect to him as his nickname is not Wilco or Walco but Wallco.

[torontovigilante]

LOL....I know, I just re-read my post and corrected.

[torontovigilante]

Thanks for the PITTS winner....!

[shevabets]

Wow!

[J.M. Disciple]

SYSTEM on its way for a combined 23-3 record! incredible start! hate for this to even out to historys average...

[reddZor]

This is amazing.

[DeLorean]

woo that Wash game got intense in the 3rd... nice season guys. I don't know hockey at all and i'm killin it thanks to this

[calebepley93]

I've lost two hockey bets all year with the systems I follow and filters I use. I'm so worried about the impending downswing that I can hardly enjoy the winning.

[on3]

great job

[Tarboroken]

Just some more wins Wallco!! Just like I like them. Thanks and continued GL!

[Kankerganker]

I can relate, I love numbers.

Nothing better than analyzing a hute dataset

[Wallco99]

Nothing better than analyzing a hute dataset

Being up 4 goals with 1:40 to go when in a +1 1/2 (C) bet @ -320 odds would seem better to me, but that is just a matter of opinoin.

[Wallco99]

I've lost two hockey bets all year with the systems I follow and filters I use. I'm so worried about the impending downswing that I can hardly enjoy the winning.

Maybe SBR has a sports betting psychologist on staff. You should look into this.

[Wallco99]

Wallco NHL GOLD
2013-14 System to date: 23-0 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: +23.00 units (fin.series)
Current open series: 0

(10/28/13):
#21 Washington (+1½) v1 (A) - Win
#22 Pittsburgh (M/L) v2 (A) - Win
#23 Chicago (M/L) v1 (A) - Win

v1 Fades
(A) 14-3
(B) 3-0
(C) 0-0
Losses: None

v2 Plays
(A) 6-0
(B) 0-0
(C) 0-0
Losses: None



Games for (10/29/13):
#24 Tampa Bay @ New Jersey (M/L) v1 (A) (7:35 pm EDT)


Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the team we are betting on, regardless of v1 or v2. If you play the closer line games too early, you may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (+1½) instead of the M/L. We will always play the M/L on favorites and (-110) games, and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait til closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines.
System rules & backtest can be found in posts #2446 and #2447.

[Wallco99]

Keep an eye on the New Jersey line. Currently they are the favorite and a M/L play, but this could change if they become a M/L DOG on scoresandodds.com by game time. We really do not need a 12 hour debate on which sites have them listed as a dog/favorite, since only one site matters anyway. It will only lead to total confusion again.

[redwing634]

Is the Edmonton oilers vs maple leafs game not in play.? Oilers have lost 3 straight.

[Wallco99]

Is the Edmonton oilers vs maple leafs game not in play.? Oilers have lost 3 straight.

No sir, not even close. Post #2447 should clear it up.

[redwing634]

No sir, not even close. Post #2447 should clear it up.

Thanks for directing me to the answer even though I'm sure you've repeated it plenty. I think I understand now. You're the best

[Boxa]

Sorry If this question is already asked, but I was wondering is there an option on scoresandodds.com to change odds to decimal? I was looking around but couldn't find it, thanks in advance.