Wisconsin hosed, NO WAY IN HELL was there an angle that showed the ball crossing the plane. If this doesn't show you that vegas or someone can dip their hands in a game I don't know what does.
-
-
Hosed on the call and no penalities on MSU the entire game....HMMMMMMMComment -
I had wisky. But it clearly cross the goalComment -
Ridiculous call. Not indisputable at all...Comment -
I had no action on this game. And I saw touchdown on the first replay. It all depends on where they rule him down because he never goes to ground. He rolls over defender and crosses plane. Wisconsin wasn't covering the 7 regardless. Heck of a game.Comment -
Hell yea I had Mich St. ML!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!Comment -
Refs just cost WI their seasonComment -
It was a TD..........One hell of an ending though....Comment -
Ball was clearly over the lineComment -
I could careless about covering the spread. The call on the field WAS NO TD and there was absolutely NO ANGLE that showed clearly that the call on the field was wrong, His shoulder crossed but it was the opposite shoulder of the ball, the ball did not touch the front of the plane or at least you could not tell definitely. Bad call. Either call TD or no TD that was made on the field should have held up with replayComment -
No way in hell was that enough evidence to overturn that.Comment -
I could care less who won that game...and he was in without question.Comment -
Ball clearly broke the plane. Remember not the entire ball has to cross. Just one inch has to break the white planeComment -
Then NOT one penalty on MSU the entire game. Things that make you go HMMMMMComment -
I agree - clearly at least the tip was on the goal line. I thought that even when he first caught it. Replays showed it for sure.
I dont know what the hell you guys were looking at. I had money on wisconsin, so dont give me any gambling BS.
at that point spread didnt matter anyway though.Comment -
Yes you are correct all ball has to do is break plan, but there was absolutely no replay that was evident enough to overturn WHATEVER CALL that was made on the field either wayComment -
he was in you could tell. cost me my parlay with Wisconsin ML.Comment -
You couldn't even see where the ball was on the replay. The refs had to guess where it was...Comment -
Ball looks to cross the plane but there was no evidence that was clear enough is my only pointComment -
the call only stand if you cant determine what happened. it was obvious the tip of the ball broke the plain. Sorry you lost your bet. I did too. it sucks but since I squared up big on USC, Stanford, and PSU I killed it tonight. this one little loss didnt hurt me.
I am still unbiased enough to know that was a TD though.Comment -
It was an obvious TD.Comment -
I was on Wisky as well and the ball clearly crossed the plane of the goal. They did show a replay that had a very good angle and his shoulders were in by a yard. I was hoping Wisc could have pulled out the -7 which would have taken a miracle but Bielema is an idiot. Why the hell did he call timeouts.
Now MSU not having 1 penalty called tonight was fishy but that last call was correct. There's an angle that is very clear.Comment -
experience wins - I wont give you any BS about the game being called fairly one sided though. I still say the ball was in though.Comment -
I also will agree with anyone who posts "Beliema is an idiot" Havent been able to stomach this guy ever since he went for "2" vs Minnesota last year just to be a c*cksucker.Comment -
I stand corrected guys, after watching the breakdown after the game the ball did break the plane.Comment -
LOL I don't mind saying I was wrong. I always thought it crossed but I didn't think they should have overturned the original call but after the highlighted the line and ball in the post game you can see they made the right call. My apologies for starting this thread.Comment
