Maybe something like this has been tried before I joined SBR. Maybe it is something the members could care less about. I’m gonna propose it anyways and we’ll see where it goes from there.
I’m thinking everyone recommend 5 members who are regular posters for college football. We will accept only the three that the majority has nominated and see if they are willing to work together in a joint effort to select a consensus card for the week. I am suggesting everyone nominate 5 because I am assuming that pag11 will be nominated by a vast majority and not to be deciding for him but not sure it is something he would have time for or interest in. That would leave 4 to elect as the SBR Syndicate and 1 alternate in case one of the nominees doesn’t want to participate.
I’m not asking for a popularity vote. We would need to seriously nominate members that know their stuff. Preferably members that while specialize in a specific conference (i.e. MSUSpartan32 in the Big Ten) but have good knowledge of others. We can either vote on a specific number of games (would suggest 5 max) the week prior and the team can collaborate and give their opinions on each game or just have them do their own cards and decide on the games they agree on.
I’m just curious to see if a few of our members where to work together what damage could be done.
If you would like to see this move forward go ahead and post your selection in this thread. If you see your name nominated and would have no interest in participating go ahead and post that in this thread as well.
I’m thinking everyone recommend 5 members who are regular posters for college football. We will accept only the three that the majority has nominated and see if they are willing to work together in a joint effort to select a consensus card for the week. I am suggesting everyone nominate 5 because I am assuming that pag11 will be nominated by a vast majority and not to be deciding for him but not sure it is something he would have time for or interest in. That would leave 4 to elect as the SBR Syndicate and 1 alternate in case one of the nominees doesn’t want to participate.
I’m not asking for a popularity vote. We would need to seriously nominate members that know their stuff. Preferably members that while specialize in a specific conference (i.e. MSUSpartan32 in the Big Ten) but have good knowledge of others. We can either vote on a specific number of games (would suggest 5 max) the week prior and the team can collaborate and give their opinions on each game or just have them do their own cards and decide on the games they agree on.
I’m just curious to see if a few of our members where to work together what damage could be done.
If you would like to see this move forward go ahead and post your selection in this thread. If you see your name nominated and would have no interest in participating go ahead and post that in this thread as well.
