It's gambling...you win some, you lose some. There's no need to listen to the bashing. You didn't force them to follow your bets. You're doing well. Keep up the good work and thanks for sharing your picks.
-
Comment -
Ignore them Net. You'll get to usual form next week.
You had some bad breaks today. Off the top of my head, I can think of the Air Force game where they didn't go for the field goal on 4th down and 6 at the 25 yard line. That would have made it 13-0 with 2 minutes to go.
A $10,000 turnaround right there.
Wish you luck for the rest of the week.Comment -
wonOriginally posted by Netprofit
this week: 10-10-2 -$10,390
overall: 94-60-3 +$55,984Comment -
both lossesOriginally posted by Netprofit
this week: 10-12-2 -$19,840
overall: 94-62-3 +$46,534Comment -
wonOriginally posted by Netprofit
this week: 11-12-2 -$16,840
overall: 95-62-3 +$49,534Comment -
Better luck next week, Net!Originally posted by NetprofitComment -
lossOriginally posted by Netprofit
this week: 11-13-2 -$23,260
overall: 95-63-3 +$43,114Comment -
11-13-2 -$23,260
lost some big plays - we are analysing what went wrong this week and hope to learn from these mistakes.
knowing that you do not win all the time and it is all about percentage is one of the basic principles in sports handicapping.
we do not get carried away when we win, we do not lose confidence when we lose, we will just go on doing what we do.
thanks for everyone who supports ...Comment -
GL next week!Comment -
yes goodluck next week!Comment -
Thanks for sharing.
Comment -
with that record if you were betting $3300 @ -110 to get 3K, you would be up an amazing $77.000!
it's clear that you know what u do on NCAAF (hitting over 60%), so wouldn't be better to bet the same amount on all plays?Comment -
You still do not see the big picture, do you? You are 95 and 63. You should be up a lot more than you are. You use the term "we" indicating that there are more than one of you wagering, which is what I have expected all along. Basically, because of incorect wagering, you are down. You lose too many big wagers. To win in this game, you must wager consistantly. You guys do not have nearly enough money to lose over 11K in a week that saw you go 11-13. I know you do not play in Vegas, because I see the odds you get. Your goal is probably unattainable at this rate, but I like your spirit. If you really wager what you claim that you do, you should have already been down on some games to take advantage of the lead line.Comment -
Originally posted by BigdaddyQH
You are annoying, dude... can't stand the big talker like you.
Need attention or what???
Comment -
Tulsa vs. UTEP OVER 60 -104
$1,040 to win $1,000Comment -
I did not check out this thread last night or I would have DOUBLED up on my UNDER bet. No disrespect Mr Net, Sir. I say no disrespect cuz I don`t want the boys that worship you to give me a hard time!! LOL...
Take the Vikings on Sunday boys.
Oh, and I almost forgot...Good try Net. You will get it back on Saturday Net. Don`t listen to the haters Net. Choo the Man, Net!!Comment -
If you guys don't like his picks, why do you even come to the thread? Just to start S**t?Comment -
1st Half
Florida State vs. North Carolina UNDER 23.5 -115
$2,300 to win $2,000Comment -
because for every fan boy, there is always a hater. that's just how the world works, my man. it's part of life.Originally posted by coreygmanComment -
haha a schmuck like crimson who prolly has a 500 dollar bankroll fading net lol, that is hilariousComment -
so many assh*les in this forum, so few bullets...Comment -
I agree with you, and I don't think many of these people realize what the point of a forum is: exchange of good information. But I just ignore those who don't contribute and choose not to acknowledge their weird/nonsensical comments. If you don't like a team though, I suggest you post why so we can all look over it.Originally posted by BigBlue77
Comment -
bro, it seems like every thread in this forum has whinny, little, bit*hes that complain when they tail someone's picks and they end up losing. I have a tremendous amount of respect for NetProfit for sticking with his picks and ignoring all of these haters.Originally posted by mebaranI agree with you, and I don't think many of these people realize what the point of a forum is: exchange of good information. But I just ignore those who don't contribute and choose not to acknowledge their weird/nonsensical comments. If you don't like a team though, I suggest you post why so we can all look over it.
Its worse than romperoom in some of these threads. If you gamble and cannot accept losing when it happens, then simply put, dont gamble.Comment -
ditto that
Comment -
Thank you for the positive remarks and inputs.
We already do not have enough time doing the analysis / research / handicapping work, why should we waste any time with people who have probably tail and upset when the picks turn out losers.Comment -
True, good pointOriginally posted by Netprofit Nice hit on the Under 1st half of the Florida St. game. I think you hit it by a 1/2 point.
Comment -
Your avatar says a lot about you. Too stupid to think for yourself, but hey, maybe that is a good thing. Two things...you commenting, guessing on the size of a man`s bankroll is a lot like trying to guess the size of his penis. It makes you look gay, cuz neither should matter to you. Secondly, Net (who has a keyboard of his own and has never taken exception to anything I have typed in this thread should tell you something) does not hit 100% of his picks, so to be on the other side of one of his plays, especially one that loses, only suggests that I make my own plays. Some of you are probably too new at this, or just plain ass kissers that like to see their shit in print to realize that if you are going to fade or tail someone, you keep track of their picks so that you can best "pick your spots". Netman himself will agree with this statement, and truth be known, I bet he is not upset by ANYTHING I have ever typed in one of his threads. It is always ass tasters like you Brock that take exception.Originally posted by brooks85Comment -
lossOriginally posted by Netprofit
this week: 0-1-0 -$1,040
overall: 95-64-3 +$42,074Comment -
winOriginally posted by Netprofit
this week: 1-1-0 +$960
overall: 96-64-3 +$44,074Comment -
Rutgers vs. Army UNDER 39 -102
$510 to win $500Comment -
Okay, not that I'm trying to bash you. But sometimes you make me question your legitimacy. You did this many times before. You won on that bet. The first half total is 23. So you're still under.Originally posted by Netprofit
Now, don't you check your bet history in whatever sites you're with every day to see if balance is increasing or decreasing? What wins what loses? If you are diligently update your stats here, then you should have one internally right? Some kind of excel sheet perhaps?Comment -
ermm... it's just a typo. he forgot to type in "win"Comment -
2nd Half
Rutgers vs. Army UNDER 17.5 -120
$600 to win $500Comment -
good luck!Comment -
winOriginally posted by Netprofit
this week: 2-1-0 +$500
overall: 97-64-3 +$44,574Comment
