NCAAF Sharp Action

[Getch13]

CFB Sharp Action
Colorado State Loser
HAW-CSU over Winner
DUQ-MAS under Loser
Rice Loser

BOL Getch

[JMUplayer]

Non pro sharp action
Lmao

[Getch13]

NCAAF Sharp Action Record

Home Fav 0-2
Home Dog
Road Fav
Road Dog
Over 1-0
Under 0-1

CFB Sharp Action
Central Florida Winner
Northwestern Winner
NW-PUR over Winner
Minnesota Winner
NEW MEX ST-MIN over Winner
Tulane (small) Winner

BOL Getch

[ClayMaker52]

These are reposts of the @betthegreek twitter handle, no? you're tracking them for the year or?

[Getch13]

These are reposts of the @betthegreek twitter handle, no? you're tracking them for the year or?

That is correct

[Getch13]

NCAAF Sharp Action Record

Home Fav 0-2
Home Dog 1-0
Road Fav 2-0
Road Dog 1-0
Over 3-0
Under 0-1

CFB Sharp Action
Duke Winner
UTA ST-MSU over Winner
Wisconsin Loser
Nevada Winner
San Diego State Loser
Colorado Winner
CU-CSU over Loser

BOL Getch

[Getch13]

NCAAF Sharp Action Record

Home Fav 3-3

Home Dog 3-1

Road Fav 3-2

Road Dog 1-3

Over 9-3

Under 1-1

CFB Sharp Action
Houston Loser
MASS-BC over Winner
KN ST-ILL over Loser
Texas State Loser
Northern Illinois Loser
Texas Loser
SMU-NT under Winner
MAR-MIA over Winner
MTSU Loser
BYU Winner
UNLV Winner
CIN-UCLA over Loser
MIS-TT over Winner
CC-SC over Winner
Oregon Winner
LOU-ALA over Winner

BOL Getch

[Getch13]

NCAAF Sharp Action Record
Home Fav 3-3
Home Dog 3-1

Road Fav 3-3
Road Dog 1-3
Over 10-3
Under 1-1

CFB Sharp Action
Miami (small) Loser
Over Winner

BOL Getch

[Getch13]

NCAAF Sharp Action Record

Home Fav 3-3

Home Dog 3-1

Road Fav 3-3
Road Dog 1-3
Over 10-3
Under 2-1

CFB Sharp Action
TCU/SMU Under (small) Winner

BOL Getch

[A Quant]

Just to understand this.

You are tracking a twitter handle, but posting the results AFTER the fact?

Why not take 9 seconds and post them pregame?

[Getch13]

Just to understand this.

You are tracking a twitter handle, but posting the results AFTER the fact?

Why not take 9 seconds and post them pregame?

Q all plays are posted before start of games then edited as they go final

[Getch13]

NCAAF Sharp Action Record
Home Fav 4-4
Home Dog 3-1
Road Fav 4-4
Road Dog 3-4
Over 11-4
Under 7-4

CFB Sharp Action
Liberty Loser
App St Winner
App ST-CHA under Loser
EMU-PUR under Winner
Air Force Winner
ODU Loser
FIU-ODU under Winner
AZ-HOU over Loser
Kansas Winner
Memphis Loser
GA-SC over Winner
IOWA ST-IOWA under Winner
CLEM-A&M under Loser
UVA-IU under Winner
Arkansas Loser
PSU-PITT under Loser
Stanford Winner
MSU-ASU under Winner

BOL Getch

[Hman]

GL with your action

[Getch13]

GL with your action

Thanks Hman obviously you take the overs for now, GL to you as well

[Getch13]

NCAAF Sharp Action Record
Home Fav 5-4
Home Dog 3-1
Road Fav 4-4
Road Dog 3-4
Over 11-4
Under 7-4

CFB Sharp Action
Memphis Winner

BOL Getch

[Eddy Munny]

What is this crap?

[Getch13]

NCAAF Sharp Action Record

Home Fav 6-5
Home Dog 4-2

Road Fav 5-5

Road Dog 3-4

Over 14-7

Under 7-6

Early CFB Sharp Action (Games Before 3:30)
OU-ISU under Loser
FSU-SYR over Loser
TEM-MD over Loser

BOL Getch

[Getch13]

Later Games

CFB Sharp Action
Baylor Loser
USF Loser
Florida Winner
CSU-FLA over Loser
OHIO-VA over Winner
ORE ST-NEV under Loser
Alabama Winner
MI-PUR over Winner
Purdue Winner
New Mexico State Loser
ASU-SD ST over Winner

[Getch13]

NCAAF Sharp Action Record
Home Fav 6-5
Home Dog 4-2
Road Fav 5-5
Road Dog 3-4
Over 14-7

Under 8-6

Sharp money on Tulsa-Temple under Winner
BOL Getch

[Getch13]

NCAAF Sharp Action Record

Home Fav 6-5
Home Dog 4-2
Road Fav 5-5
Road Dog 3-4
Over 15-7

Under 8-7

CFB Sharp Action
UCF-FAU over Winner
WAZZU-USC under (small) Loser

BOL Getch

[gojetsgomoxies]

thx for doing this... i love stuff like this.

over/under is pretty impressive

i feel like ATS betting has been funny (i.e. i'm a big loser) so far this year

[gojetsgomoxies]

sharps seem to prefer favourites...... and faves had been gold first 2 weeks. dogs were pretty good last week

[Getch13]

Your welcome G. In past years that I've track the Greek Totals do better over time.

BOL tonight

[BigdaddyQH]

You have no idea what a sharp is. You are as phony as they come. Tell me and the listening audience just exactly what YOU think a sharp is. Then sit back and watch me make a fool out of you.

[Getch13]

You have no idea what a sharp is. You are as phony as they come. Tell me and the listening audience just exactly what YOU think a sharp is. Then sit back and watch me make a fool out of you.

Bigdaddy I think you and maybe some others are confused about what this and my similar (sharp action) threads are about, so let me clarify. The Greek offshore sportsbook and casino post daily plays from their said sharp players and their sharp players only, I'm merely tracking said plays.

As far as me not knowing what a sharp players is, well that's easy for me. A sharp player is someone who can win 58% in any one sports over a long period. If you would like to share your knowledge of how a sharp player or syndicate will move a line for the soul purpose of middling, or why they don't play favorites on the money line over -130 that often, and why they mostly play dogs that they think can win outright, and I'm sure you can tell us why their favorite sport to play is NCAAB, well information like that I would welcome in any of my threads.

Thanks in advance for your coming knowledge.
Getch

[Getch13]

<br> Teddy Covers Pros vs Joes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MB3UO9Y4Mc

[Getch13]

NCAAF Sharp Action Record

Home Fav 8-8
Home Dog 4-3
Road Fav 7-5
Road Dog 8-5
Over 17-8

Under 11-10

Early CFB Sharp Action (Games Before 3:30)
NV-SMU under Loser
Ohio Winner
NEB-MICH over Winner
LOU-VA under Winner
Late Games

Kansas Loser
KU-BAY under Winner
VT-ODU over Winner
Alabama Loser
ALA-TX A&M under Loser
Ohio State Winner
Oregon State Loser
Texas State Winner
Army Winner
ARMY-OU under Winner
Oklahoma State Loser
TROY-ULM under Loser
FLA-TEN under Loser
LA Tech Winner
Auburn Winner
Michigan State Winner
MSU-IU over Winner
ECU Winner
Stanford Winner
ASU-WAS over Loser
San Diego State Loser

BOL Getch

[Getch13]

Added late games

[Getch13]

NCAAF Sharp Action Record

Home Fav 8-8
Home Dog 4-3
Road Fav 7-5
Road Dog 8-6
Over 17-8

Under 11-10

North Carolina (small) Loser

BOL Getch

[BigdaddyQH]

Getch. There is no confusion on my part. You have proven that you know absolutely NOTHING about sharps. So far, you have posted two mistakes that sharps never make. First, Sharps know that 55% winnings is gravy, NOT 58%. The target is 55%. Second, and most importantly, Sharps NEVER EVER wager on as many games in one week as the weeks you posted. On one week, you have 22 or more wagers posted. That is strictly for Squares and wanna-be's. Now you have no idea what sport is the favoritie of sharps because you do not KNOW any sharps. If you are just copying something from some book that you cannot even wager with in this country, I have to ask why? Your lines are also screwed up. You posted Troy-ULM Under as a loser. Troy won that game 35-27. The total was 62. The posted number at game time was 64. The under was a winner. You cheated yourself, or they cheated themselves. You are going to have to do a lot better than this to convince anyone that you deal with sharps.

[Fedor]

Shouldn't you be attacking the Greek sportsbooks BigD? Or, crazy idea, tell us what a sharp is; I'm here to learn

[Louisvillekid1]

like the thread, ty

[A Quant]

Getch. There is no confusion on my part. You have proven that you know absolutely NOTHING about sharps. So far, you have posted two mistakes that sharps never make. First, Sharps know that 55% winnings is gravy, NOT 58%. The target is 55%. Second, and most importantly, Sharps NEVER EVER wager on as many games in one week as the weeks you posted. On one week, you have 22 or more wagers posted. That is strictly for Squares and wanna-be's. Now you have no idea what sport is the favoritie of sharps because you do not KNOW any sharps. If you are just copying something from some book that you cannot even wager with in this country, I have to ask why? Your lines are also screwed up. You posted Troy-ULM Under as a loser. Troy won that game 35-27. The total was 62. The posted number at game time was 64. The under was a winner. You cheated yourself, or they cheated themselves. You are going to have to do a lot better than this to convince anyone that you deal with sharps.

Jesus Christ, LEARN TO FUKKING READ.

He is posting the plays IDENTIFIED BY TGSB as "sharp". It is not his opinion, it is the books'.

You may have a brain tumor, you can't read.

[Getch13]

Getch. There is no confusion on my part. You have proven that you know absolutely NOTHING about sharps. So far, you have posted two mistakes that sharps never make. First, Sharps know that 55% winnings is gravy, NOT 58%. The target is 55%. Second, and most importantly, Sharps NEVER EVER wager on as many games in one week as the weeks you posted. On one week, you have 22 or more wagers posted. That is strictly for Squares and wanna-be's. Now you have no idea what sport is the favoritie of sharps because you do not KNOW any sharps. If you are just copying something from some book that you cannot even wager with in this country, I have to ask why? Your lines are also screwed up. You posted Troy-ULM Under as a loser. Troy won that game 35-27. The total was 62. The posted number at game time was 64. The under was a winner. You cheated yourself, or they cheated themselves. You are going to have to do a lot better than this to convince anyone that you deal with sharps.

BigDaddy The break even point for all sports gamblers is 52.4% maybe a little higher now with the added juice in games now a days more so on totals then in years past. You are correct that most pro sports gamblers will take a winning percentage over the break even point. My response of 58% is what I consider a sharp player. If you what to follow someone hitting at 55% that's up to you (from what I see from some of your plays you should start).

I would ask you, are all sharps playing one game, or can 10 or more sharps be on different games and totals, with so many plays to choose from in NCAA sports ? Next I would like to know from all your sharp friends what sport they feel is the easiest to profit from ?

As far as the Troy game goes Bet365 opened the total at 63.5 beat down to 58.5 at closing, William Hill opened 63.5 closed 60 Westgate Las Vegas opened 61.5 closed 59. These plays having been posted mostly 1 hour before the first games kickoff, we have no chose but to us the closing line for tracking.

I'm surprised by the fact you don't know why someone would track said sharp action plays. I'll let you think some more on that.

I see you didn't attack my part about middling, favorites over -130 or dogs that can win outright, so are you sure I know absolutely nothing about sharps or do you have a reason from leaving that part out ?

Finally I'll ask you again why not share your knowledge of a sharp, instead of a thread asking other's for the soul purpose of belittling them.
Teach a men to fish and he'll eat forever, I forgive you for which you do not know.

Getch

[A Quant]

BigDaddy The break even point for all sports gamblers is 52.4% maybe a little higher now with the added juice in games now a days more so on totals then in years past. You are correct that most pro sports gamblers will take a winning percentage over the break even point. My response of 58% is what I consider a sharp player. If you what to follow someone hitting at 55% that's up to you (from what I see from some of your plays you should start).

I would ask you, are all sharps playing one game, or can 10 or more sharps be on different games and totals, with so many plays to choose from in NCAA sports ? Next I would like to know from all your sharp friends what sport they feel is the easiest to profit from ?

As far as the Troy game goes Bet365 opened the total at 63.5 beat down to 58.5 at closing, William Hill opened 63.5 closed 60 Westgate Las Vegas opened 61.5 closed 59. These plays having been posted mostly 1 hour before the first games kickoff, we have no chose but to us the closing line for tracking.

I'm surprised by the fact you don't know why someone would track said sharp action plays. I'll let you think some more on that.

I see you didn't attack my part about middling, favorites over -130 or dogs that can win outright, so are you sure I know absolutely nothing about sharps or do you have a reason from leaving that part out ?

Finally I'll ask you again why not share your knowledge of a sharp, instead of a thread asking other's for the soul purpose of belittling them.
Teach a men to fish and he'll eat forever, I forgive you for which you do not know.

Getch

BigDaddy does not offer much. He pops into a thread, yaps at people, creates threads acting insane.

He doesn't offer much beyond that.