OK, I've made similiar statements about a "revenge" game in my posts as many are making with some games this week (i.e. UCLA vs. Arizona)...everytime I read these I have to think, OK this other team kicked their ass last year, and then this year they are just supposed to turn around and get their ass kicked by the other team?...I just don't get it...people said the same thing about Fresno and Nevada (Nevada covered)...same thing about Florida vs. Alabama (luckily I covered with Florida, but Alabama played them very tough for 55 mins.)...my point is, usually when a team gets their ass whipped there are certain match-up problems another team presents...I just don't understand the reasoning behind people picking the other sides of these games the following year, in that the game's a lot more likely to be close than it is to be a blow-out, considering how last year's game went...
now, UCLA may very well cover tommorrow, but I think if you can track the majority of these types of revenge games, you will see the dog cover at a 55-60% clip...just my thoughts...GL this weekend...
now, UCLA may very well cover tommorrow, but I think if you can track the majority of these types of revenge games, you will see the dog cover at a 55-60% clip...just my thoughts...GL this weekend...