UFC Super Heavyweighters

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NunyaBidness
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 07-26-09
    • 9345

    #1
    UFC Super Heavyweighters
    None
  • MD
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 01-31-12
    • 9728

    #2
    None is good. I don't like None, he's crap.
    Comment
    • sideloaded
      SBR Hall of Famer
      • 08-21-10
      • 7561

      #3
      pride had the best super heavyweights
      Comment
      • Grabaka
        SBR MVP
        • 02-19-11
        • 3216

        #4
        Comment
        • NunyaBidness
          SBR Hall of Famer
          • 07-26-09
          • 9345

          #5
          His pic is up on the UFC site:
          Comment
          • NunyaBidness
            SBR Hall of Famer
            • 07-26-09
            • 9345

            #6
            So is his wife's:

            Comment
            • Grabaka
              SBR MVP
              • 02-19-11
              • 3216

              #7
              ...
              Last edited by SBR Jonelyn; 05-15-15, 10:38 AM. Reason: image does not exist
              Comment
              • Beelzebubzy
                SBR Hall of Famer
                • 06-06-11
                • 6995

                #8
                Who wins in an mma fight undertaker or triple h
                sac give me a breakdown. Undertake is a better striker but triple h is a technical brawler like immortal
                Comment
                • MD
                  SBR Hall of Famer
                  • 01-31-12
                  • 9728

                  #9
                  That reminds me, when I watched Wrestlemania, they referred to Undertaker as the best striker in WWE history. What the actual f-ck.
                  Comment
                  • Sacrelicious
                    SBR Hall of Famer
                    • 11-29-12
                    • 5984

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Beelzebubzy
                    Who wins in an mma fight undertaker or triple h
                    sac give me a breakdown. Undertake is a better striker but triple h is a technical brawler like immortal
                    As MD already stated, I would cap the undertaker at roughly -300 vs Triple H.

                    Not only for the fact that as already stated, he is the best technical striker in the WWE but his submissions on the ground are vastly superior. That being said, the HHH vs Brock match showed that Triple H has been improving in his own submission attempts, but is having difficulty actually securing them.

                    Smart money here is on the "No Contest" prop for after the decision gets overruled by the athletic commission when he tests positive for banned PED's.
                    Comment
                    • Thor4140
                      SBR Posting Legend
                      • 02-09-08
                      • 22296

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Sacrelicious
                      As MD already stated, I would cap the undertaker at roughly -300 vs Triple H.

                      Not only for the fact that as already stated, he is the best technical striker in the WWE but his submissions on the ground are vastly superior. That being said, the HHH vs Brock match showed that Triple H has been improving in his own submission attempts, but is having difficulty actually securing them.

                      Smart money here is on the "No Contest" prop for after the decision gets overruled by the athletic commission when he tests positive for banned PED's.
                      i don't know man. Five years ago i would cap Triple Beak at -10000 over Taker. He dominated every story line that existed. Why the ratings went to shit.
                      Comment
                      SBR Contests
                      Collapse
                      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                      Collapse
                      Working...