Originally posted by xgame
-
There isn't, they won (C). If that's not what you meant, then you may need to change a few of your verbs.Comment -
wallco unlimited
what would the "D" have been if the phightin's had lost? the mutts?Comment -
No problem, keep that in mind.Originally posted by Wallco99Comment -
yay, wonderful night
5 outta 5 bets won for me, Wallco and Hagball`s C bets cash in
Lines cleared, but not just yet raising the units...
Gotta love this community, and I would like to see this thread become as informative and productive as the NBA too
Comment -
Congrats Phils backers, may we all continue to prosper
No new sweeps to report, Hoping that the O's will win today to sweep the Red Sox.Comment -
I'm relieved that allidoiswin89's bankroll is gonna be alright lol... congrats all! great night
Comment -
As Stevex says, JM's Version 3 almost runs on the same lines. Firstly, though, there is a huge RPI filter to pass through. The sweeper team must be more than .025 RPI higher than the swept team before the 1st game. If the swept team then wins the first game of the series you then chase the sweeper over the remaining 2 (occasionally 3) games. Some of us bet on the sweeper on game 1 and if it wins we don't play the V3 (we've already won with a pre-emptive bet). If it loses, V3 kicks in, but with higher stakes. It went perfect last season.Originally posted by mrginandtonic
The RPI filter usually places the match up in JM's V1, so we don't have a record of all sweepers avoiding sweeps on their return series. The historical winning JM A Bets should provide the start point for any stats.
KevComment -
HagballOriginally posted by doin
And he did so Post #977Comment -
I posted on my cardrunners forum, but no one wanted to listen to me. They said blackjack is unbeatable, but I believe i have big enough sample size now to prove other wise. Hopefully betus does not ban my account for making so much money off them.
You guys are all nice, so ill just tell you. YOU CAN BEAT BLACK JACK USING LABBY SYSTEM. i have took my orginal bankroll of $50 and times it by 20 over past 3 days. For those of you bad at math thats = $1000
*note I do not recommend starting bankroll of $50.
Thats all i really want to release to the public forum for now. I am going to talk to a friend to try make an e-book on this so i can market it online. Its pretty much gaurenteed money though. I am not sure how many hands i actually have to play to prove that it works though. i have played a ton of hands though.
PS: Not sure if i should market it to public or not cause I dont want sites removing blackjack from online cause people making so much off them.
Also if you all know any software that actually tracks blackjack per hand please let me know. I know i can make an excel sheet and find my hourly rate that way, but im curious to how much you would make per hand, per hour, Roi, and variance... etc.
I couldnt' find nothign on google, but i know there has to be something out there...Comment -
I don't doubt it. But surely the secret is how you play the game, rather than the amounts you risk. Did you use a structured system on the table, or just your skill and intuition?Originally posted by J.M. Disciple
KevComment -
that is a good question - I am one of the suckers who has lost significant sums in BJ...after I thought I had a system.Comment -
That is correct.Originally posted by jphilComment -
If you are going to write a book, you must stop using double negatives in a sentence. Lol. Good job on your win.Originally posted by J.M. DiscipleComment -
Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 32-0
System profit/loss: +43.21 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +22.95 units (17-0) (fin. series)
Current open series: 0
(4/27/11) Philadelphia (-1½) (C) – Win
(4/27/11) Philadelphia (M/L) (C) - Win
(A) 18-14
(B) 8-6
(C) 2-4
(D) 4-0
Next games:
(4/28/11) Chicago Cubs (M/L) @ Arizona (A)
(4/28/11) Chicago Cubs (-1½) @ Arizona (A)
**All lines and standings are based on final lines on ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change by game time. Official plays will not change. Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “official” appears next to the game. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½).Comment -
Morning all. Wallco, thanks for the Phillies play, that was my big winner yesterday rl and ml. Let's skin them dirtbacks today.
Comment -
Thank you. Out of 4 possible sweeps yesterday there were none. There are 5 possible sweeps today providing the Twins were to lose the doubleheader. Yesterday the Cubs got rained out and the makeup game is 6/27 so it must be tracked. If they lose that one then it becomes a system play.Originally posted by Kev the BritComment -
Look up ^.Originally posted by clamchowderMorning all. Wallco, any plays for today? Thanks for the Phillies play.Comment -
thought the cubbies would be a potential play. sweet.Comment -
Is there a good website that lists all the rainout makeup dates for MLB? They are kind of hard to find without doing a lot of digging, or happening to see it go across the TV screen.Comment -
I'm curious about your system. Let me know if you decide to publish it.Originally posted by J.M. Disciple
If you are really splitting your lines (replacing a number on the line with 2 numbers etc.) like you posted earlier, then I doubt that it will work in the longrun.Comment -
Scratch what I said about the Cubs next play against the Rockies. They don't face each other again this season after that makeup game.Comment -
If it's rescheduled right away there is usually some mention in the game recap but sometimes it isn't determined until later.Originally posted by Wallco99Comment -
How many lines in your labby?Originally posted by J.M. DiscipleComment -
Great win with the Phillies!Comment -
got the giants in a play against the piratesComment -
I thought I had a system with roulette using labby....started with 100 went up to 2.8 k then went down to 1.5 then pulled out. Anything I play after that is failure. You have no idea how many hands I played from $100 on the road to $2800 that made me firmly believe that my system couldn't lose. But it did. The house always has the advantage...Originally posted by J.M. DiscipleComment -
mariner tiger game this afternoon... can't imagine tiger's getting swept. Any input from ya'll?Comment -
Wallco are cubs official? Sorry just didnt see that.Comment -
I've been having luck with betting but my bankroll hasn't been increasing. I put 100 in before made up too 150 then bombed on bj and lost everything. Since I'm a poor college student I was only able to load 25 more dollars in. Because of that, my bets are low and I've stayed at 25 for 3 days straight betting all day. Any tips to increase my bankroll, like betting less games and betting more on the ones I bet one? Just trying to look for a lil help, ima newbie. Gl everyone today GGComment -
It depends on how much you handicap, if you are putting in alot of time and handicapping many factors, that would lend itself to making many plays. But if your handicapping is one-dimensional and limited, I would say make just one play or very few plays each day.Comment -
espn.com. Go to one of the postponed team's page and click on "Complete schedule" just to the right of the current day's schedule. I don't know of any consolidated list anywhere.Originally posted by Wallco99
Kev
PS. Good work last night with the PhilliesComment -
Also the local newspaper sports section if you have time to read it.Comment -
No that one is going to take a while. It is a 9:40 game and I am still looking at a couple of things with that play. This is not a game we want to rush today. I know it sucks, but check back around 8:00 if nothing is posted before that. To everyone: I WILL NOT FORGET TO POST PLAYS WHEN THEY BECOME OFFICIAL. Every day someone asks, assuming I am not paying attention or forgot. I am checking most of these games several times an hour. If it is not posted official, then the posts, asking whether or not they are official, are unnecessary. The only reason I post early in the morning is so people know a play will be that night. If you prefer, I can wait until games become official to post them for the first time. But I think people will miss a lot that of them that way. I will refer to this post in the future. I am not singleing you out, just trying to eliminate some of the clutter on here from my system so the "JM only" guys don't get too upset. We can't have that. Thanks.Originally posted by analyzerComment -
posting plays official
I like how you're doing it and you're right, then I know there will be a play later in the day. It does help, however, if you could give a window of time, such as what you said it about checking back around 8. Then I don't have to check so frequently!
Thanks!
Originally posted by Wallco99Comment -
As soon as I am comfortable with them, I put them on. Some of them take almost til game time to handicap, but only a few times so far. I would say a half hour before game time at the latest, but obviously sooner if possible. I wouldn't go any closer than a half hour before game, some people wouldn't be left with enough time that way. I would like to make it a standard to post all close plays 1/2 hour before start of games, then everyone would know exactly when to look. But I will continue to do it this way unless the majority want it that way. Put it this way, as soon as I know, you know. Not one of my bets are going in, either, before I list them as official. If we want this system to continue to work, then we have to make sure we are making the right plays, and as I've stated before, it is not always clear cut, and some take some monitoring, which I am doing for everyone. But if you want to check only once, then definitely 1/2 hour before game time they will be up.Originally posted by LucyleeI like how you're doing it and you're right, then I know there will be a play later in the day. It does help, however, if you could give a window of time, such as what you said it about checking back around 8. Then I don't have to check so frequently!
Thanks!Comment
