I think H00dini is still "steaming" from choosing the Cubs instead of the DBacks last night. WOW!
Comment
teecee
SBR Hall of Famer
09-18-09
6298
#1227
well, no offense, but i hope the plays (besides angels) lose, so that i can jump in and play tomorrow. i have to go to work now.
Comment
dlunc3
SBR Hall of Famer
10-31-09
9129
#1228
Originally posted by teecee
well, no offense, but i hope the plays (besides angels) lose, so that i can jump in and play tomorrow. i have to go to work now.
Time for a smart phone..
Comment
Wallco99
SBR Hall of Famer
01-01-11
7261
#1229
Originally posted by 1gamer
Mars aligned with Jupiter
That is pretty good. However I did check that. They were not aligned by 9:15 last night so I had to go to the backup plan. I threw two pieces of paper with a treat wrapped inside, to my dog, She picked up the Arizona paper, so that had to be the play. And they think I don't have a system. Man's best friend for a reason.
Comment
teecee
SBR Hall of Famer
09-18-09
6298
#1230
Originally posted by 1gamer
I think H00dini is still "steaming" from choosing the Cubs instead of the DBacks last night. WOW!
why even post the cubs as a potential play, if the d'backs are being considered just as strongly? why not say, 'potential play in the cubs/d'backs series.' ultimately, if you're following, the word "official" should determine whether or not a play is made. i'm just confused as to how you go from cubs m/l and -1.5, to d'backs m/l and -1.5, which was obviously the better play, when nothing really changed at all.
Comment
Wallco99
SBR Hall of Famer
01-01-11
7261
#1231
Wallco MLB PLU$$$ - Plays for 4/29/11 2011 System to date: 34-0 System profit/loss: +45.92 units (finished series) Since my first post: +25.65 units (19-0) (fin. series) Current open series: 0
Detroit (M/L) @ Cleveland (A) *Official* Detroit (-1½) @ Cleveland (A) *Official* L.A. Angels (M/L) @ Tampa Bay (A) *Official* * (A) * (A)
* There is one more game which may qualify, later, that will produce two more plays for today. As of now, it hasn’t qualified, but it probably will. I will post these games when they become official, as to try to avoid any confusion caused by a deleted pick.
**All lines and standings are based on final lines on ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “official” appears next to the game. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½).
Comment
1gamer
SBR Wise Guy
02-09-11
723
#1232
Originally posted by Wallco99
That is pretty good. However I did check that. They were not aligned by 9:15 last night so I had to go to the backup plan. I threw two pieces of paper with a treat wrapped inside, to my dog, She picked up the Arizona paper, so that had to be the play. And they think I don't have a system. Man's best friend for a reason.
LMAO
Comment
teecee
SBR Hall of Famer
09-18-09
6298
#1233
Originally posted by dlunc3
Time for a smart phone..
whether i have a "smart phone" or not. i'm at work, and therefore, should not be playing around on my phone. that's not what i get paid to do.
Comment
Wallco99
SBR Hall of Famer
01-01-11
7261
#1234
Originally posted by teecee
why even post the cubs as a potential play, if the d'backs are being considered just as strongly? why not say, 'potential play in the cubs/d'backs series.' ultimately, if you're following, the word "official" should determine whether or not a play is made. i'm just confused as to how you go from cubs m/l and -1.5, to d'backs m/l and -1.5, which was obviously the better play, when nothing really changed at all.
A lot changed, I will start posting the unofficial games with no team in blue if that is how you want it. That will just start a whole new crop of questions, but we'll answer all them as I have answered all so far. At the time of the post, the Cubs fit the criteria. By game time, it totally switched. I type the paragraph under the plays EVERY DAY explaining this for a reason. Not just to take up space and make my post look more elaborate.
Comment
h00dini
Restricted User
09-17-09
659
#1235
Originally posted by 1gamer
I think H00dini is still "steaming" from choosing the Cubs instead of the DBacks last night. WOW!
. nah.......not really.
Comment
h00dini
Restricted User
09-17-09
659
#1236
Originally posted by teecee
why even post the cubs as a potential play, if the d'backs are being considered just as strongly? why not say, 'potential play in the cubs/d'backs series.' ultimately, if you're following, the word "official" should determine whether or not a play is made. i'm just confused as to how you go from cubs m/l and -1.5, to d'backs m/l and -1.5, which was obviously the better play, when nothing really changed at all.
exactamoondo
Comment
Cuueball
SBR Rookie
11-23-09
23
#1237
Originally posted by Wallco99
That is pretty good. However I did check that. They were not aligned by 9:15 last night so I had to go to the backup plan. I threw two pieces of paper with a treat wrapped inside, to my dog, She picked up the Arizona paper, so that had to be the play. And they think I don't have a system. Man's best friend for a reason.
Thats the way all the pro's (touts) do it.
Comment
h00dini
Restricted User
09-17-09
659
#1238
i wont even bother ........simply your an idiot.
Comment
teecee
SBR Hall of Famer
09-18-09
6298
#1239
Originally posted by Wallco99
A lot changed, I will start posting the unofficial games with no team in blue if that is how you want it. That will just start a whole new crop of questions, but we'll answer all them as I have answered all so far. At the time of the post, the Cubs fit the criteria. By game time, it totally switched. I type the paragraph under the plays EVERY DAY explaining this for a reason. Not just to take up space and make my post look more elaborate.
"official" should be the indicator. just the way you've been doing it. it was my fault for jumping the gun. i was just trying to get you to tell me why there was a reversal. but, no dice.
Comment
Beef_Supreme
SBR High Roller
02-03-11
157
#1240
You 2 dipshits can keep complaining but it just makes you look dumber everytime you make a post. You clearly don't understand not to play if it isn't posted "official" so theres no more explaining necessary. If it's that hard for you, check this thread once, maybe twie a day slightly before gametime and you will have no problems. If you are unable to do this (because of your extremely important job that consists of zero downtime) then dont play the system. Period. End of story
Comment
teecee
SBR Hall of Famer
09-18-09
6298
#1241
two points for wallco. whether it seems as though i appreciate your plays, or not, i do. thanks for posting.
Comment
h00dini
Restricted User
09-17-09
659
#1242
Originally posted by clamchowder
Hoodini, I don't understand your point. What difference does it make if Wallco's plays are system or not? Will his plays become more scrumptious if they are "system" plays? In your own definition, what is a "system" play? You should just stick with JM's plays since it's a "system". What is JM's "system" record ytd?
im not bashing wallco........you got it wrong. all im saying its not a system where so and so occurs, you take this for a b and c. get it? for example.....he had the cubs/arizona game yesterday. he had cubs highlighted but later switched to arizona and made it official. why?
anyway.........good luck
Comment
teecee
SBR Hall of Famer
09-18-09
6298
#1243
Originally posted by Beef_Supreme
You 2 dipshits can keep complaining but it just makes you look dumber everytime you make a post. You clearly don't understand not to play if it isn't posted "official" so theres no more explaining necessary. If it's that hard for you, check this thread once, maybe twie a day slightly before gametime and you will have no problems. If you are unable to do this (because of your extremely important job that consists of zero downtime) then dont play the system. Period. End of story
i get the "official" part, asswipe. second of all, if someone is paying you to fukking work, you shouldn't be fukking off on your phone. no one needs to send 25 text messages, or make sports gaming wagers when someone is expecting you to do a job. i don't get breaks, b/c i don't smoke.
Comment
black666
SBR Hustler
01-02-09
86
#1244
You guys need to relax. I don't know what hoodini did wrong .. he just questioned the fact if Wallco's "system" is actually a system since some games take almost to game time to become official .. which sounds a lot like handicapping.
Take the shutout or the original JM system for example. One minute after the current gameday has ended, we know all plays for the next gameday - because it's a system.
hoodini just asked a reasonable question and even appreciated Wallco's work here .. no reason to gang up on him.
Let's just keep this thread friendly, wait for Wallco to post official plays and let us all make $$ :-)
Comment
Beef_Supreme
SBR High Roller
02-03-11
157
#1245
Originally posted by teecee
i get the "official" part, asswipe. second of all, if someone is paying you to fukking work, you shouldn't be fukking off on your phone. no one needs to send 25 text messages, or make sports gaming wagers when someone is expecting you to do a job. i don't get breaks, b/c i don't smoke.
You need to find a new job because A) you are constanly working nights B)you arent allowed any breaks unless you are smoking C) it is affecting your overall happiness because you are complaining over a free hand out.
It's almost like you're on welfare and bitching that you can't buy beer with your food stamps
Comment
SkivChef
SBR Wise Guy
10-19-09
730
#1246
How about u guys pm each other with your childish remarks, u r clogging up the thread !
Comment
Wallco99
SBR Hall of Famer
01-01-11
7261
#1247
Originally posted by Beef_Supreme
You 2 dipshits can keep complaining but it just makes you look dumber everytime you make a post. You clearly don't understand not to play if it isn't posted "official" so theres no more explaining necessary. If it's that hard for you, check this thread once, maybe twie a day slightly before gametime and you will have no problems. If you are unable to do this (because of your extremely important job that consists of zero downtime) then dont play the system. Period. End of story
No need to refer to them as that, they do contribute here a lot as well. This whole thing is a little unorthodox, I can understand people getting confused sometimes. But I am trying to be as clear as possible. If anyone wants me to post things differently, I am more than happy to do so. I just want EVERYONE to win and be happy. I will post the unofficial plays as I mentioned earlier, see if that eases some of the tension. We are all in this together, let's stay in line.
Comment
Wallco99
SBR Hall of Famer
01-01-11
7261
#1248
Originally posted by teecee
two points for wallco. whether it seems as though i appreciate your plays, or not, i do. thanks for posting.
I fully understand both of your situations, with the exception of the "no system" part. I am not offended in the slighest, I want you to understand as much as I can disclose, and when you don't, Ifeel like I'm not doing my job. I am really trying to make this as easy as possible, if it doesn't say official, whichever teams are highlighted at any time, DO NOT PLAY YET. But as I stated, I will work on a new post method for tomorrow.
Comment
Wallco99
SBR Hall of Famer
01-01-11
7261
#1249
Originally posted by black666
You guys need to relax. I don't know what hoodini did wrong .. he just questioned the fact if Wallco's "system" is actually a system since some games take almost to game time to become official .. which sounds a lot like handicapping.
Take the shutout or the original JM system for example. One minute after the current gameday has ended, we know all plays for the next gameday - because it's a system.
hoodini just asked a reasonable question and even appreciated Wallco's work here .. no reason to gang up on him.
Let's just keep this thread friendly, wait for Wallco to post official plays and let us all make $$ :-)
The SYSTEM says if (A) (B) (C) (D) and (E) happen, play this team, and if not play the other team. All of these factors aren't always known 1 minute after the previous game ends as you state. All systems use this theory, but is is usually as simple and unthought out as if (A) happens, bet this team, otherwise nothing. But you know what, this is my last response to any of this. I will post plays, whoever wants them, feel free to use them. I no longer give a sh*t if it's viewed as a system a handicap, or a random pick out of a whiskey barrel. It works, and has made a lot of units in the past, and is doing very well right now. I only have 1 rule: "wait for official". If people can't do that, then I really can't help them anyway.
Comment
SkivChef
SBR Wise Guy
10-19-09
730
#1250
Thanks for all your work Wallco, much appreciated!
Comment
1gamer
SBR Wise Guy
02-09-11
723
#1251
Just make sure to Always: Check...Check...Recheck before getting down on a play.
Comment
Wallco99
SBR Hall of Famer
01-01-11
7261
#1252
Originally posted by 1gamer
Just make sure to Always: Check...Check...Recheck before getting down on a play.
Or just simply look for "one word".
Comment
GGPLAYER
SBR MVP
03-26-09
2981
#1253
I'm Officially worn out from this thread. Wallco you have the patience of a Saint.
Comment
Wallco99
SBR Hall of Famer
01-01-11
7261
#1254
Ireally don't see what the problem is with people having to go to work, not being able to get on a computer and missing plays, the way I am doing it. Even if people knew all the "whys" of the team change, they would have also been waiting, had to be at work with no computer at the same time, and still missed the play. Unless they broke the sytem rules, and put it in before criteria for a play was met, if that is the case, then what is the point of the system. As far as people playing the wrong team, impatience and breaking the only rule which is stated is the cause for that. Also out of my control. But on a happier note, let's make some loot and stop all the fighting. This is a close knit group and I would love to keep it that way. If this system is going to cause so much fighting among all of you, I will have to pull it, for the integrity of the thread. Play nice!
P.S: This is not an inlet for the "JM only" guys to start trouble to try to end it. I know who they are. Lol.
Comment
1gamer
SBR Wise Guy
02-09-11
723
#1255
Originally posted by Wallco99
Or just simply look for "one word".
Does that word start with an O and end with an L?
Comment
Beef_Supreme
SBR High Roller
02-03-11
157
#1256
Didnt mean to tick anybody off earlier (well i kind of did) but i apologize for that. I think i can can cintribute a constructive suggestion possibly. For unofficial plays, I would just list them like you did with an asterisk and maybe put the time of the game without having to actually list the game being considered so that people would know when to check back without being confused or picking the wrong team initially. Just a thought..
Comment
1gamer
SBR Wise Guy
02-09-11
723
#1257
Don't pull the picks buddy...then we'll get stuck playing -150 to -220 MLB games all season long.
Comment
IceBet
SBR Hustler
04-14-11
66
#1258
Originally posted by teecee
i get the "official" part, asswipe. second of all, if someone is paying you to fukking work, you shouldn't be fukking off on your phone. no one needs to send 25 text messages, or make sports gaming wagers when someone is expecting you to do a job. i don't get breaks, b/c i don't smoke.
Ever think of taking up smoking?
That way you get breaks and instead of putting money into cigs you can buy Popeye cigs and a smartphone with a dataplan. AND you would still be ahead.
IceBet
Comment
IceBet
SBR Hustler
04-14-11
66
#1259
Originally posted by Wallco99
A lot changed, I will start posting the unofficial games with no team in blue if that is how you want it. That will just start a whole new crop of questions, but we'll answer all them as I have answered all so far. At the time of the post, the Cubs fit the criteria. By game time, it totally switched. I type the paragraph under the plays EVERY DAY explaining this for a reason. Not just to take up space and make my post look more elaborate.
Hey Wallco99,
So far so good, I have been loving the plays.
Here is my two cents on your posting. (No matter what the way you are doing it now works for me. I am able to look for *Official* pretty easily )
I agree to make it easier for some maybe only post the plays in black until they become official, I wouldn't even bother showing which team the -1.5 RL is on. Maybe just put before (or after) the line if it is a ML or RL bet.
I would like to see any potential plays also posted each time. You mentioned today there is potentially 1 or 2 more but you weren't posting them to reduce confusion. However, I find I need to check in a lot (depending on the day) if you don't mention which game you are thinking of because there can be games starting all day long. I know today isn't bad as most are 7 EST but if you posted the game in question we could at least know the latest we could check in without missing the play.
Anyway that is my two cents. However you decide to do it is fine with me. I am along for the ride.