SDQL and why I don't bet MLB without it!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TechnicalTrader
    SBR MVP
    • 05-09-16
    • 1434

    #1
    SDQL and why I don't bet MLB without it!
    I rarely watch games I bet on, but when I do I usually only try to pick up trends. I was watching the first game of the TOR/STL DH'er yesterday and noticed two things. 1) the Cardinals play single A ball. Running in to outs, dropping routine plays at second, getting picked off at second on a failed bunt attemp, etc and 2) TOR's bullpen is extremely worn down. As the game proceeded in to extra innings I asked myself how John Gibbons was going to manage the second game with a rookie starter up and already being 6 pitchers deep in to the game. I ran a quick SDQL:



    The query is simple: Dating back to 2010, what have teams done coming off of a fist game doubleheaeder loss after their bullpen gave up more than 4 runs, while using more than 5 pitchers.

    As expected, teams loss 14 out of 19 times and when they lose, they lose with an avg margin of over 3 runs. SU's RoI was 49.5% and the RL's RoI was at +54.6%.

    I only risked 1% of BR on both the RL and SU play. Should've put a little more on it.

    Any one else bet like this? Would love to hear about some of your strategies.
  • OoDeBaby
    SBR Wise Guy
    • 04-30-13
    • 554

    #2
    Originally posted by TechnicalTrader
    I rarely watch games I bet on, but when I do I usually only try to pick up trends. I was watching the first game of the TOR/STL DH'er yesterday and noticed two things. 1) the Cardinals play single A ball. Running in to outs, dropping routine plays at second, getting picked off at second on a failed bunt attemp, etc and 2) TOR's bullpen is extremely worn down. As the game proceeded in to extra innings I asked myself how John Gibbons was going to manage the second game with a rookie starter up and already being 6 pitchers deep in to the game. I ran a quick SDQL:



    The query is simple: Dating back to 2010, what have teams done coming off of a fist game doubleheaeder loss after their bullpen gave up more than 4 runs, while using more than 5 pitchers.

    As expected, teams loss 14 out of 19 times and when they lose, they lose with an avg margin of over 3 runs. SU's RoI was 49.5% and the RL's RoI was at +54.6%.

    I only risked 1% of BR on both the RL and SU play. Should've put a little more on it.

    Any one else bet like this? Would love to hear about some of your strategies.
    Wow thats pretty funny I actually bet on that game too, just the RL using something sort of similar.

    p:double header=1 and p:WOW

    Always looking for unique situations like this when I have time to watch the games. Never really bet too much tho due to the queries always having a small sample size.
    Comment
    • TechnicalTrader
      SBR MVP
      • 05-09-16
      • 1434

      #3
      Originally posted by OoDeBaby
      Wow thats pretty funny I actually bet on that game too, just the RL using something sort of similar.

      p:double header=1 and p:WOW

      Always looking for unique situations like this when I have time to watch the games. Never really bet too much tho due to the queries always having a small sample size.
      I agree, I usually use them to test ideas. Nice query. Using the same time frame I used, you get very similar numbers on the SL and RL:

      p:double header=1 and p:WOW and season>=2013

      23.9% RoI
      72.9% RoI
      Comment
      • BarstoolProphet
        SBR MVP
        • 06-05-14
        • 1151

        #4
        I could get behind a stat like that one. There is some strong logic behind it. unlike :

        Dating back to 1920 , teams on a DH when the temp is > 65 on a Tuesday and wearing white , are 19-0 in the 2nd game.
        Comment
        SBR Contests
        Collapse
        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
        Collapse
        Working...