Taking Overs in MLB?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rankslash
    SBR MVP
    • 07-29-13
    • 1562

    #1
    Taking Overs in MLB?
    Hi guys, got a question here.
    I'm thinking about a chase system of betting overs in MLB.
    For example we take:

    Day 1: Boston RedSox to hit the Over - 1 Unit
    Day 2: If Day 1 game was over, we will bet Boston RedSox to hit Over again in day 2 with 1 unit. If last game was Under we will bet 2 Units for Game 2.

    If game 2 is under too, i will bet game 3 with 4 units, and then game 4 with 8 units. If game 4 stays Under too, i will start with 1 unit bet from game 5 (similar to Wallco NHL system?)

    Do you see any value in this?
  • gui_m_p
    SBR High Roller
    • 09-18-13
    • 123

    #2
    Originally posted by rankslash
    Hi guys, got a question here.
    I'm thinking about a chase system of betting overs in MLB.
    For example we take:

    Day 1: Boston RedSox to hit the Over - 1 Unit
    Day 2: If Day 1 game was over, we will bet Boston RedSox to hit Over again in day 2 with 1 unit. If last game was Under we will bet 2 Units for Game 2.

    If game 2 is under too, i will bet game 3 with 4 units, and then game 4 with 8 units. If game 4 stays Under too, i will start with 1 unit bet from game 5 (similar to Wallco NHL system?)

    Do you see any value in this?
    Sorry, but this is a kind of Martingale, and the system per si do not have any value. Read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marting...etting_system)

    It only got value if the picks (not the system) would be +EV.

    Moreover, you will be increasing your chances to go bankrupt. Remember that great sequences of losses are expected in the long haul. For instance, in each 200 plays of picks with 50% you expect to see a sequence of 6 straight losses.

    If you do this for a long time, probably one time you will broke.
    Comment
    • rankslash
      SBR MVP
      • 07-29-13
      • 1562

      #3
      Originally posted by gui_m_p
      Sorry, but this is a kind of Martingale, and the system per si do not have any value. Read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marting...etting_system)

      It only got value if the picks (not the system) would be +EV.

      Moreover, you will be increasing your chances to go bankrupt. Remember that great sequences of losses are expected in the long haul. For instance, in each 200 plays of picks with 50% you expect to see a sequence of 6 straight losses.

      If you do this for a long time, probably one time you will broke.
      Yes, i'm aware of that and completely agree.
      That's why my second question was how often MLB teams make more than 5 straight Unders in a row? Basically, if i have less than 10 losing bets (after bet 4) the system will be profitable.
      Comment
      • gui_m_p
        SBR High Roller
        • 09-18-13
        • 123

        #4
        Originally posted by rankslash
        Yes, i'm aware of that and completely agree.
        That's why my second question was how often MLB teams make more than 5 straight Unders in a row? Basically, if i have less than 10 losing bets (after bet 4) the system will be profitable.
        I don't know the data. But if you are inclined to go on with the system, you don't have to play the same team after a loss, play any team you think will hit under/over. Rememeber the events are independent, if Red Sox was O in one game it don't increases the chances to go U the next.
        Comment
        • LT Profits
          SBR Aristocracy
          • 10-27-06
          • 90963

          #5
          Originally posted by rankslash
          Yes, i'm aware of that and completely agree.
          That's why my second question was how often MLB teams make more than 5 straight Unders in a row? Basically, if i have less than 10 losing bets (after bet 4) the system will be profitable.
          It really doesn't matter because all it takes is two or three runs like that to cripple you, so even if the odds on 10 straight Unders are 0.5%, those runs WILL happen a couple of times in a long season like MLB.
          Comment
          • gregm
            SBR MVP
            • 03-14-11
            • 3535

            #6
            I just read a good article last night about cameras and the strike zone with PITCHf/x.

            Basically more strike outs, less walks, a decrease in run numbers over the last 5 years. PED testing and an increased strike zone with pitch tracking technology grading umpires, it should be interesting to see to see these totals this year. Last year was an atrocious year for me betting overs, judging from my data.

            For the first time online, here is Jon’s SABR Award-nominated essay from THT 2014.


            RESULTS OF CALLED PITCHES IN THREE REGIONS OF INTEREST, BY YEAR

            Year Balls Strikes Expected runs
            2008 91,727 37,866 2,606
            2013 85,556 42,456 1,892

            Comment
            • rankslash
              SBR MVP
              • 07-29-13
              • 1562

              #7
              I've got another idea... I saw that over 62 % of the games are 0-0 after the 1st inning. I was thinking about betting the Over Live in the 2nd inning of the games. For example if the line is 6.5 before the match. It will be around 5.5-6 after the first inning.
              Comment
              • rankslash
                SBR MVP
                • 07-29-13
                • 1562

                #8
                Can anyone give me the stats for the Overs/Unders for last season? I remember it was around 54-46 % Overs.
                Comment
                • LT Profits
                  SBR Aristocracy
                  • 10-27-06
                  • 90963

                  #9
                  Originally posted by rankslash
                  Can anyone give me the stats for the Overs/Unders for last season? I remember it was around 54-46 % Overs.
                  I have Under with the slight advantage.

                  Code:
                  Over Rank	Team 	Over	Under
                  1	LA Angels 	88	68
                  2	Oakland 	84	74
                  3	Philadelphia 	83	74
                  4	Seattle 	82	72
                  5	Detroit 	81	75
                  6	Houston 	80	76
                  7	St. Louis 	79	75
                  8	NY Mets 	79	77
                  9	Washington 	79	76
                  10	Toronto 	79	80
                  11	Tampa Bay 	76	78
                  12	Cincinnati 	76	79
                  13	Milwaukee 	76	82
                  14	Colorado 	76	77
                  15	San Diego 	75	82
                  16	Baltimore 	75	78
                  17	Cleveland 	74	81
                  18	Boston       	74	81
                  19	Atlanta 	73	81
                  20	LA Dodgers 	73	82
                  21	San Francisco 	73	80
                  22	Pittsburgh 	71	85
                  23	Arizona 	71	84
                  24	Minnesota 	70	87
                  25	Chi. White Sox 	69	84
                  26	Chi. Cubs 	68	86
                  27	NY Yankees 	67	85
                  28	Texas         	64	90
                  29	Miami         	62	83
                  30	Kansas City 	61	92
                  	Total          	2238	2404
                  	League       	1119	1202
                  	Pct.           	48.2%	51.8%
                  Comment
                  • rankslash
                    SBR MVP
                    • 07-29-13
                    • 1562

                    #10
                    Originally posted by LT Profits
                    I have Under with the slight advantage.

                    Code:
                    Over Rank    Team     Over    Under
                    1    LA Angels     88    68
                    2    Oakland     84    74
                    3    Philadelphia     83    74
                    4    Seattle     82    72
                    5    Detroit     81    75
                    6    Houston     80    76
                    7    St. Louis     79    75
                    8    NY Mets     79    77
                    9    Washington     79    76
                    10    Toronto     79    80
                    11    Tampa Bay     76    78
                    12    Cincinnati     76    79
                    13    Milwaukee     76    82
                    14    Colorado     76    77
                    15    San Diego     75    82
                    16    Baltimore     75    78
                    17    Cleveland     74    81
                    18    Boston           74    81
                    19    Atlanta     73    81
                    20    LA Dodgers     73    82
                    21    San Francisco     73    80
                    22    Pittsburgh     71    85
                    23    Arizona     71    84
                    24    Minnesota     70    87
                    25    Chi. White Sox     69    84
                    26    Chi. Cubs     68    86
                    27    NY Yankees     67    85
                    28    Texas             64    90
                    29    Miami             62    83
                    30    Kansas City     61    92
                        Total              2238    2404
                        League           1119    1202
                        Pct.               48.2%    51.8%
                    Thanks man!
                    One more question, which lines do you use for your data? I remember a difference between the totals of 5dimes and bet365 by at least a 0.5 point.
                    Comment
                    • LT Profits
                      SBR Aristocracy
                      • 10-27-06
                      • 90963

                      #11
                      Pinny closers 99% of the time
                      Comment
                      SBR Contests
                      Collapse
                      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                      Collapse
                      Working...