THREADS! MOOOOOOAR THREEEEEEADS! My Fourth Pickin'-Thread <3

[Hardcoar]

I am not HardCoar by I saw Cornet - Kucova and neither was plying actually well with Cornet struggling even more. I will bet Zakopalova or even better the over. Cornet is more than prone to Murrayitis an Overish Girl. You can bet your global farms on that



well against Beck even though I thought her already gone to the walhalla of bad tennis players, she didn't. penetrate you Beck ...or better not.

Thanks for the info!

[Cappinpicks]

what a lock Garica FLOPEZZZ

[Hardcoar]

thats okay now that i know! Thanks Hardcoar! lets get these

You perhaps. Not necessarily everyone else.

[Cappinpicks]

paire was lucky to win yesterday no right in hell to be favored

[Hardcoar]

Garcia @ 2.6 – 5 units (Pinnacle)

[Hardcoar]

Young/Verdasco O 22 @ 2.15 – 10 units (Pinnacle)

[Hardcoar]

Would that I could've posted those earlier.

[CallMeGENO]

is lopez still a lock?

[Hardcoar]

Hmm?

Oh, that guy...

[Hardcoar]

I will say I'm really liking GGL as the underdog with Paire *5-3 up 2:nd!!

Edit: And he gets the break right back... lol!

[Cappinpicks]

yes lopez never in doubt like the other better doggies garcia 6-1 6-1 winner

[AceAce]

Paire isn't giving a penetrate, he's throwing the match and not even caring. Just throwing out drop shots and not running much

[CallMeGENO]

yea hes packin it in. ready to get to monte carlo without losin too much juice in whitehouse.

[CallMeGENO]

wait lopez is a huge choker, nvm. mix in a double ther bud, good job.

[Cappinpicks]

shit face oprandi lucky to win 2 games at -200 LOL

[CallMeGENO]

lopez will not proceed to lose

[Cappinpicks]

wait lopez is a huge choker, nvm. mix in a double ther bud, good job.

the favored player never wins, paire will choke the TB

[Hardcoar]

http://forum.sbrforum.com/tennis-betting/2186886-live-score-match-commentary-chat-p395.html#post21617270

[CallMeGENO]

ok GGL nice job. makes it interesting as usual.

[Hardcoar]

Did you confuse my bet on Garcia with Garcia-Lopez Geno??

Very rarely do I make such mistakes so assume it's you who are mistaken if something doesn't give, but feel free to ask by all means!

Also, please refer to this thread for random comments or spam:

http://forum.sbrforum.com/tennis-betting/2186886-live-score-match-commentary-chat-p395.html#post21617270

[CallMeGENO]

no i did not, i bet on GGL. And sorry, i got your two threads confused. will only use this one to discuss and find your picks. cheers.

[Cappinpicks]

where can you see the public bets for tennis?

[fitguy67]

Exactly. I'll try to keep in mind entering "1:st set" from now on.

i'd suggest "set1" as a crystal clear yet still efficient rendering of what you now designate as "1:st"

it could even be shortened to just s1 (a i do on my spreadsheets)...but idiots will always be idiots and ask without even thinking,

set1, in contrast is completely unambiguous...yet requires exactly the same number of keystrokes as your current notation, which never fails to trigger questions from newcomers...i'd hate to see you wasting more keystrokes than necessary each and every time you put on a set1 bet

"Occam's Razor" Rules

[frugalgambler]

Thanks for the tip on Garbagelles, HC.

PS I see that you are getting a bit frustrated by the increase in random posts in your thread. That is the price you have to pay for being the best tennis capper right now. Keep it up, HC.

PPS I do not get all the discussion of 1st vs set1. If you do not get that in the first place, you probably should not be tailing anybody.

[Hardcoar]

Thanks for the tip on Garbagelles, HC.

PS I see that you are getting a bit frustrated by the increase in random posts in your thread. That is the price you have to pay for being the best tennis capper right now. Keep it up, HC.

PPS I do not get all the discussion of 1st vs set1. If you do not get that in the first place, you probably should not be tailing anybody.

That's a good point actually... damn good!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImeQVhu5FCM&t=4m15s

[Hardcoar]

i'd suggest "set1" as a crystal clear yet still efficient rendering of what you now designate as "1:st"

it could even be shortened to just s1 (a i do on my spreadsheets)...but idiots will always be idiots and ask without even thinking,

set1, in contrast is completely unambiguous...yet requires exactly the same number of keystrokes as your current notation, which never fails to trigger questions from newcomers...i'd hate to see you wasting more keystrokes than necessary each and every time you put on a set1 bet

"Occam's Razor" Rules

It's not about the keystrokes my main man... it's all about the style!

[Hardcoar]

Almagro -4.5 @ 2.32 – 4 units (Pinnacle)

[Hardcoar]

Carballes Baena @ 1.865 – 20 units (Pinnacle)

KEXX

Giraldo @ 1.55 – 5 units (Pinnacle)

KEXX

Garcia 1:st @ 2.29 – 5 units (Pinnacle)

KEXX

Rybarikova 1:st @ 2.18 – 10 units (Pinnacle)

FUXX

Garcia-Lopez/Paire O 22 @ 1.8 – 5 units (Pinnacle)

KEXX

Garcia @ 2.6 – 5 units (Pinnacle)

KEXX

Young/Verdasco O 22 @ 2.15 – 10 units (Pinnacle)

FUXX

Total hits: 195
Total mishits: 254
Total stake: 2049u
Net yield: +193.267u
ROI: +9.43% (rounded)

[Hardcoar]

Pending:

Almagro -4.5 @ 2.32 – 4 units (Pinnacle)

[fitguy67]

Exactly. I'll try to keep in mind entering "1:st set" from now on.

i do not/did not propose changing your current "1:st" notation...it's always been fine with me
(Occam's Razor= if it ain't broke...no need to fix it)

YOU suggested you'd make an effort to change it to "1:st set" to somehow "fix it" for those who continue to be confused...i simply presented "set1" as an easier alternative to that, if you felt you must do something...
(Occam's Razor = if you decide to change something for some reason, opt for the simplest change that works...subject to the dictates of your own "style", of course)
_______
carry on as you see fit...and keep peeling off those plays from your amazing deck of better-than+5%ROI cards

[Hardcoar]

Garcia-Lopez @ 1.49 – 20 units (Pinnacle)

[Hardcoar]

Delbonis @ 1.79 – 5 units (Pinnacle)

[Hardcoar]

Garcia @ 1.75 – 10 units (Pinnacle)

[Honeybadger44]

Huh. Bold play on GGL. Of course, case can be made that kid is running out of gas, but then again, he is 20 years old. He can play 3 consecutive matches, then rest for 6 hours and play another 3 . Of course, I am exaggerating. All I wanted to say is that fatigue should not be very big problem for him at the moment, imho.
Garcia lopez doesn't have the best forhend. Also not the best backhand, defense or the serve. But he still managed to win a lot of matches on ATP tour. That shows me that he is a tricky and smart player, which can adjust and find ways to beat different opponents. That being said, he will probably do a lot of things to get the kid out of his comfort zone. His comfort zone is standing few meters behind baseline and defend, because he can run left to right all day long and bring those balls back. That's why I expect GGL is probably going to mix it up a lot with his shots, or maybe even lure Carballes to be more offensive.

Anyway. What I wanted to say, is that this match could go in different directions. I will maybe put a small wager on the over, or stay completely away. But good luck to you!

Delbonis did not play his best tennis this week, but I still like that play. He should win.

[Hardcoar]

Garcia 1:st @ 1.87 – 10 units (Pinnacle)