EZStreet theft, deception and TheRx whitewashing Video (banned at TheRx)

[TheMoneyShot]

Can we shut this thread down now???

[HedgeHog]

I think the point has been made. Easystreet will rip you off if you are a big winner. Case closed...thread too.

According to SBR John, the thread is closed. Someone obviously didn't get the memo.

[skrtelfan]

Wilhelm admitted he was banned. At the RX they call it "post review" but it's essentially a banning. I'm banned from the RX, er, "on post review" for making one single post about 5Dimes poor customer service.

[cory1111]

obviousldy hh you didnt get the memo:easystreetsports.com doesnt pay and is blacklisted. and scooter, you couldnt be more correct.

#97
Scooter


SBR PRO
Joined: 01-15-07
Posts: 609
SBR Points: 2062

Message Me


Quote:
Originally Posted by sharpcat
WTF makes you think that you have any importance in this case? Are you the judge or a juror?

WTF makes you think that anybody needs to prove anything to you and why would they waste their time doing so since you are a nobody?
So there, Carloschihuahua.

Try talking facts and logic and get the juvenile wrath of "sharp"cat, who can't cope with facts and logic.


In addition, "sharp"cat is a well known scam artist.

Again I extend my challenge as I have time and time again for SBR_John, Lou, or Justin7 to come forth and state that "sharp"cat has never been banned from any book for fraudulent activity.

They will not come forth and state this, nor will "sharp"cat be able to disprove the numerous allegations.
He won't even make an attempt.

Pot. Kettle.
Last edited by Scooter; Today at 03:03 AM..

[cory1111]

avoid easystreetsports.com ,they dont pay and are blacklisted.

[quagmire]

ez owes 46k and wont pay, they are crooks thats a fact!!!! and they stole his deposit, talk about low-lifes!!!!!!

[quagmire]

ez owes cory 46k and made up excuse after excuse and was caught lying with each excuse.

ez is a pathetic book and everyone in the industry agreed that cory should get paid along with every forum out there except the rx and thats only because they delete negative posts about ez. the damage control has been kicked up a few notches since the start of nfl but its not working lol...... the ez shills are truly pathetic and comical how they pat each other in the back.

[cory1111]

+1 ,I totally agree quagmire.

[cory1111]

avoid easystreetsports.com ,they dont pay.

[quagmire]

ez owes a player 46k and wont pay they also kept his deposit!!!!!!

stay away, you can be next!!!!!! lets keep running this book in the ground so they cant do this again.

[cory1111]

avoid easystreetsports.com at all costs. they are blacklisted and graded D by SBR.

LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search Thread
Rate This Thread
Display
11th April 2011 10:50 PM #1 KGambler
Registered User

Join Date
Apr 2011
Location
USA
Posts
3
Thanks
0
Thanked 6 Times in 2 PostsRep Power
0
Reputation Points: 40
EasyStreetSports.com Casino Steals $46K from winning player!
I wanted to warn people about this casino. Their actions in this case have been truly reprehensible. I was not sure where this post should go. If it is supposed to go in the "casino complaints" section, could a moderator please move it? The reason I did not put it there is because I am not the player in question. I don't have any direct connection to the case, but hearing about this has really angered me.

Here are the basic facts:


1. player "Cory1111" (gonna call him Cory) deposited about 10 times to EasyStreetSports.com. He got a 100% bonus each time. He sent the money by ** or **. His first deposit did not reach the sportsbook, but they decided to ignore that and allow him to continue depositing.



2. eventually the player hit 3 Royal Flushes. All of his play was on Jacks or Better. He had about $60K in his account at one point, because he was playing as high as $25 a spin at times. He kept playing and lost about $12K back, and at this point the casino froze his account and opened an investigation. He had not been bonus hunting, because he played over 400X the deposits + bonuses!



3. The casino told the player that he cheated and that he used a bot to play, which is against their terms of service. He said he did not cheat nor use a bot. They told him he must come to Costa Rica and pass a lie detector test in order to receive a payout!



4. At this point the player went to several forums with his issue. He complained to SBR (sportsbookreview) and also theRX. SBR took up the complaint and EZStreet agreed to work with them. TheRX told Cory that he was a known scammer and that they would not help him. SBR wound up ruling in favor of the player. At this point, EZ Street told SBR not to contact them anymore. They then announced that Wilheim, head moderator of theRX, would be the mediator. Of course, Cory was not so hot on the idea of Wilheim being the "mediator". By this point, he realized that EasyStreetSports was a major advertisor over at theRX and that the theRX had something of a reputation as a fake watch dog site. Easy Street Sports and Wilheim both ignored Cory's protestations and went ahead pretending that Wilheim was mediating the dispute!



5. Wilheim began leaking information on the case in his forum. He attacked Cory's reputation relentlessly. Mostly he repeated the charges that Easy Street had already made public:

a. the player had played 8 hours straight at a rate of 17 hands per minute
b. the player had played perfect strategy
c. it is statistically impossibly to hit RFs at the rate the player did
d. Cory was banned from 21 different books for 34 seperate cases of fraud
e. Cory was asked on the phone how he hit his 3rd RF, only two hours after the fact, and he could not correctly remember
f. That Cory did not so much as pause after hitting his RFs
g. Cory hit his 3 RFs in 8,800 hands

When EasyStreetSports started to release a tiny bit of their "evidence", it turned out that most of these were blatant lies. Those allegations not disproven by EZ Street's own release of data are still unsubstantiated. They have offered no proof whatsoever. They released some logs which showed when each hand was played, but the logs did not contain hand histories.

a. the player never played a session longer than 2 hours and change
b. EasyStreetSports admitted that they did not look at the hand histories, so in fact they had no way of knowing whether he had played perfect strategy.
c. This was not true. See related point g
d. They never offered any proof of this, so most likely it is just another one of their lies. As you will see, releasing fake or misleading statistics was part of their propaganda campaign
e. This phone conversation took place 10 days after the hand, not 2 hours. The player does not even understand the question and sarcastically answers "I was dealt it" when they asked how he got a RF
f. Cory played one or two hands after each RF before taking breaks of about 20 minutes. In each case, he played until he lost a hand. Upon losing a hand (which was always 1 or 2 hands after) he took a break.
g. Cory played about 22,000 hands of JoB at Easy Street's casino. When they said he hit 3 RFs in 8,800 hands, they were only counting the hands from sessions where he hit a RF! The claim that it is not possible to hit 3 RFs in 8,800 is also false. It is about 1 in 700 (verified by Michael Shackleford, a.k.a. the Wizard Of Odds). The chance of hitting 3 RFs in 22,000 hands is about 1 in 60



6. Wilheim went ahead with his "investigation" (actually whitewash is the correct term, not "investigation"). He claimed that they had an impartial 3rd party expert who was going to look at all of the game logs and provide his findings. Bizarrely, he claimed that this mystery expert, who insisted on remaining anonymous , was not being payed. I guess this was supposed to make him sound less biased, but the idea that some guy would travel to CR to look into this for free is kind of hard to believe.



7. The sham expert released his report, and it was a complete farce. Here all of the points of the mystery "expert's" report:

a. a human did not play the hands examined. It is not possible for a human to play 17.6 hands per minute, using perfect strategy

b. the "auto-play" feature was not available to the player

c. the player had no apparent reaction to hitting his RFs

d. it is "statistically impossible" to hit 3 RFs in 8,800 hands

e. "Load tests on the system show an average screen draw time of approx 1.3 seconds, this leaves only 1.7 seconds for the "player" to recognize all of the cards on screen, compute optimal strategy, physically issue whatever action he wanted, and the system to receive that action and begin a new hand". This is not possible.

f. the player used a bot in order to play the hands fast enough to overwhelm the RNG, thus providing favorable odds to the player


This was the same tired case, which had already been disproven.

a. not one serious VP player would say it is not possible to play at that speed. Many said that it WAS possible.

b. does he mean "auto-hold"? Of course the auto-PLAY feature was not available. People report that the EZStreet casino DOES have auto-hold enabled.

c. The player did pause after hitting RFs. He took breaks of about 20 minutes in each case. This particular lie had been disproven by EZStreet's own release of the game logs

d. It is not statistically impossibly to hit 3 RFs in 8,800 hands. The chances are about 1 in 700. Worse, they player did not play 8,800 hands. He played about 22,000 hands. Why would they ignore hands from the sessions where he did not hit a RF???

e. Point A states that Cory played at a rate of 17.6 hands per minute, or 3.41 seconds per hand. So point E says that 3.4 - 1.3 = 1.7. Uh, what?

f. Play too fast and "overwhelm the RNG"? You can not make this stuff up. I am sure the software provider, DGS, would be interested to know how this is done. I am sure all of the online casinos which use DGS software would like to hear about this as well.



8. Wilheim, armed with his sham report and also pointing out that the player refused to fly to a 3rd world country to take a "lie detector test", declared that his final decision was that his sponsor, easystreetsports.com, should not pay anything. They should not even return the deposits! In a truly classless move, EZ Street Sports immediately announced that they would be holding a VP contest, with prizes which could reach $46K. I guess this was part of their payoff to theRX.



9. Not surprisingly, there was a huge uproar regarding this sham report and the biased nature of Wilheim's "investigation". As a result, Wilheim promised to get answers for any reasonable question directed to the mystery "expert". Of course, that was just another lie. The mystery "expert", who didn't seem to know anything about mathematics, Video Poker or computers, only addressed a few points and then Wilheim announced that the case was closed. The clarifications provided (through Wilheim) by the anonymous "expert":

a. He only reviewed the 8,762 hands from the winning sessions. He claims he did look at the actual hand histories, which would make him the first person to do that.

b. When he said it was "impossible" for someone to play perfect strategy at such a speed, he really meant "highly improbable". He goes on to clarify that there is no such thing as "perfect strategy", because it is just a matter of opinion what the perfect strategy is. He says that what he looked for was a discernable deviation in strategy.

c. He knew that the 3 RFs worked out to a 1 in 700 chance (no word on why he ignored the 12,000 odd hands from losing sessions), and he should have said "highly improbable" instead of "statiscally impossible"

d. He still "believes" that the player used a bot. If it was a human, his "hat is off to him or her".

Not surprisingly, these "clarifications" did not calm anybody down. The rebuttals:

a. OK, fair enough, although many people still don't believe he reviewed the hand histories for the simple reason that EZ Street refuses to release them, even to an independent 3rd party expert (a real expert, not a make-believe one)

b. What??? There is a perfect strategy for JoB. It is not a matter of opinion. So not only does this guy not know the proper strategy, but he doesn't even know that it exists??? So there is still zero proof to the claim that the player played "perfect strategy"

c. Yeah, right. No gaming "expert" would ever refer to a 1 in 700 shot as "statistically impossible". Clearly he did not know the math and listened to EZ Street's nonsense. Furthermore, the player actually played 22,000 hands! Again, his chance of hitting 3 RFs was about 1 in 60. He got lucky, but nothing crazy.

d. So it was just an opinion that the player used a bot???

So in summary, the expert came out and confirmed that they could not show he used perfect strategy, could not show he cheated (he did not mention the crazy RNG claim, despite the large number of questions about this) and could not show he used a bot!



10. As it stands now, Michael Shackleford (Wizard Of Odds) has taken up the case. He is trying to get EZ Street to agree to a meeting in Vegas where Cory will be allowed to demonstrate his speed of play in Video Poker. Cory has even agreed to take the polygraph test! EZ Street has rejected this offer, stating that Cory must first apologize to Wilheim first, and that he must drop SBR as an advocate! If he does not do these things, easystreetsports.com has no interest in talking to him!

[quagmire]

its not surprising how dumb these ez shills sound, they start a thread to pat each other on the back.

its sad and pathetic that hh went through every post in these threads just to see who got paid by ez???? wow there is no chance this poor rooster has a woman his priority is cory and ez, what kind of man would go through the trouble of going through over 3800 posts to see who got paid by ez??????? a sad and lonely one thats for sure. nobody on his list has cashed out 4600 in one shot let alone 46k, but he seems to think there is no difference....sad!!!!!!

[quagmire]

avoid easystreetsports.com at all costs. they are blacklisted and graded D by SBR.

LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search Thread
Rate This Thread
Display
11th April 2011 10:50 PM #1 KGambler
Registered User

Join Date
Apr 2011
Location
USA
Posts
3
Thanks
0
Thanked 6 Times in 2 PostsRep Power
0
Reputation Points: 40
EasyStreetSports.com Casino Steals $46K from winning player!
I wanted to warn people about this casino. Their actions in this case have been truly reprehensible. I was not sure where this post should go. If it is supposed to go in the "casino complaints" section, could a moderator please move it? The reason I did not put it there is because I am not the player in question. I don't have any direct connection to the case, but hearing about this has really angered me.

Here are the basic facts:


1. player "Cory1111" (gonna call him Cory) deposited about 10 times to EasyStreetSports.com. He got a 100% bonus each time. He sent the money by ** or **. His first deposit did not reach the sportsbook, but they decided to ignore that and allow him to continue depositing.



2. eventually the player hit 3 Royal Flushes. All of his play was on Jacks or Better. He had about $60K in his account at one point, because he was playing as high as $25 a spin at times. He kept playing and lost about $12K back, and at this point the casino froze his account and opened an investigation. He had not been bonus hunting, because he played over 400X the deposits + bonuses!



3. The casino told the player that he cheated and that he used a bot to play, which is against their terms of service. He said he did not cheat nor use a bot. They told him he must come to Costa Rica and pass a lie detector test in order to receive a payout!



4. At this point the player went to several forums with his issue. He complained to SBR (sportsbookreview) and also theRX. SBR took up the complaint and EZStreet agreed to work with them. TheRX told Cory that he was a known scammer and that they would not help him. SBR wound up ruling in favor of the player. At this point, EZ Street told SBR not to contact them anymore. They then announced that Wilheim, head moderator of theRX, would be the mediator. Of course, Cory was not so hot on the idea of Wilheim being the "mediator". By this point, he realized that EasyStreetSports was a major advertisor over at theRX and that the theRX had something of a reputation as a fake watch dog site. Easy Street Sports and Wilheim both ignored Cory's protestations and went ahead pretending that Wilheim was mediating the dispute!



5. Wilheim began leaking information on the case in his forum. He attacked Cory's reputation relentlessly. Mostly he repeated the charges that Easy Street had already made public:

a. the player had played 8 hours straight at a rate of 17 hands per minute
b. the player had played perfect strategy
c. it is statistically impossibly to hit RFs at the rate the player did
d. Cory was banned from 21 different books for 34 seperate cases of fraud
e. Cory was asked on the phone how he hit his 3rd RF, only two hours after the fact, and he could not correctly remember
f. That Cory did not so much as pause after hitting his RFs
g. Cory hit his 3 RFs in 8,800 hands

When EasyStreetSports started to release a tiny bit of their "evidence", it turned out that most of these were blatant lies. Those allegations not disproven by EZ Street's own release of data are still unsubstantiated. They have offered no proof whatsoever. They released some logs which showed when each hand was played, but the logs did not contain hand histories.

a. the player never played a session longer than 2 hours and change
b. EasyStreetSports admitted that they did not look at the hand histories, so in fact they had no way of knowing whether he had played perfect strategy.
c. This was not true. See related point g
d. They never offered any proof of this, so most likely it is just another one of their lies. As you will see, releasing fake or misleading statistics was part of their propaganda campaign
e. This phone conversation took place 10 days after the hand, not 2 hours. The player does not even understand the question and sarcastically answers "I was dealt it" when they asked how he got a RF
f. Cory played one or two hands after each RF before taking breaks of about 20 minutes. In each case, he played until he lost a hand. Upon losing a hand (which was always 1 or 2 hands after) he took a break.
g. Cory played about 22,000 hands of JoB at Easy Street's casino. When they said he hit 3 RFs in 8,800 hands, they were only counting the hands from sessions where he hit a RF! The claim that it is not possible to hit 3 RFs in 8,800 is also false. It is about 1 in 700 (verified by Michael Shackleford, a.k.a. the Wizard Of Odds). The chance of hitting 3 RFs in 22,000 hands is about 1 in 60



6. Wilheim went ahead with his "investigation" (actually whitewash is the correct term, not "investigation"). He claimed that they had an impartial 3rd party expert who was going to look at all of the game logs and provide his findings. Bizarrely, he claimed that this mystery expert, who insisted on remaining anonymous , was not being payed. I guess this was supposed to make him sound less biased, but the idea that some guy would travel to CR to look into this for free is kind of hard to believe.



7. The sham expert released his report, and it was a complete farce. Here all of the points of the mystery "expert's" report:

a. a human did not play the hands examined. It is not possible for a human to play 17.6 hands per minute, using perfect strategy

b. the "auto-play" feature was not available to the player

c. the player had no apparent reaction to hitting his RFs

d. it is "statistically impossible" to hit 3 RFs in 8,800 hands

e. "Load tests on the system show an average screen draw time of approx 1.3 seconds, this leaves only 1.7 seconds for the "player" to recognize all of the cards on screen, compute optimal strategy, physically issue whatever action he wanted, and the system to receive that action and begin a new hand". This is not possible.

f. the player used a bot in order to play the hands fast enough to overwhelm the RNG, thus providing favorable odds to the player


This was the same tired case, which had already been disproven.

a. not one serious VP player would say it is not possible to play at that speed. Many said that it WAS possible.

b. does he mean "auto-hold"? Of course the auto-PLAY feature was not available. People report that the EZStreet casino DOES have auto-hold enabled.

c. The player did pause after hitting RFs. He took breaks of about 20 minutes in each case. This particular lie had been disproven by EZStreet's own release of the game logs

d. It is not statistically impossibly to hit 3 RFs in 8,800 hands. The chances are about 1 in 700. Worse, they player did not play 8,800 hands. He played about 22,000 hands. Why would they ignore hands from the sessions where he did not hit a RF???

e. Point A states that Cory played at a rate of 17.6 hands per minute, or 3.41 seconds per hand. So point E says that 3.4 - 1.3 = 1.7. Uh, what?

f. Play too fast and "overwhelm the RNG"? You can not make this stuff up. I am sure the software provider, DGS, would be interested to know how this is done. I am sure all of the online casinos which use DGS software would like to hear about this as well.



8. Wilheim, armed with his sham report and also pointing out that the player refused to fly to a 3rd world country to take a "lie detector test", declared that his final decision was that his sponsor, easystreetsports.com, should not pay anything. They should not even return the deposits! In a truly classless move, EZ Street Sports immediately announced that they would be holding a VP contest, with prizes which could reach $46K. I guess this was part of their payoff to theRX.



9. Not surprisingly, there was a huge uproar regarding this sham report and the biased nature of Wilheim's "investigation". As a result, Wilheim promised to get answers for any reasonable question directed to the mystery "expert". Of course, that was just another lie. The mystery "expert", who didn't seem to know anything about mathematics, Video Poker or computers, only addressed a few points and then Wilheim announced that the case was closed. The clarifications provided (through Wilheim) by the anonymous "expert":

a. He only reviewed the 8,762 hands from the winning sessions. He claims he did look at the actual hand histories, which would make him the first person to do that.

b. When he said it was "impossible" for someone to play perfect strategy at such a speed, he really meant "highly improbable". He goes on to clarify that there is no such thing as "perfect strategy", because it is just a matter of opinion what the perfect strategy is. He says that what he looked for was a discernable deviation in strategy.

c. He knew that the 3 RFs worked out to a 1 in 700 chance (no word on why he ignored the 12,000 odd hands from losing sessions), and he should have said "highly improbable" instead of "statiscally impossible"

d. He still "believes" that the player used a bot. If it was a human, his "hat is off to him or her".

Not surprisingly, these "clarifications" did not calm anybody down. The rebuttals:

a. OK, fair enough, although many people still don't believe he reviewed the hand histories for the simple reason that EZ Street refuses to release them, even to an independent 3rd party expert (a real expert, not a make-believe one)

b. What??? There is a perfect strategy for JoB. It is not a matter of opinion. So not only does this guy not know the proper strategy, but he doesn't even know that it exists??? So there is still zero proof to the claim that the player played "perfect strategy"

c. Yeah, right. No gaming "expert" would ever refer to a 1 in 700 shot as "statistically impossible". Clearly he did not know the math and listened to EZ Street's nonsense. Furthermore, the player actually played 22,000 hands! Again, his chance of hitting 3 RFs was about 1 in 60. He got lucky, but nothing crazy.

d. So it was just an opinion that the player used a bot???

So in summary, the expert came out and confirmed that they could not show he used perfect strategy, could not show he cheated (he did not mention the crazy RNG claim, despite the large number of questions about this) and could not show he used a bot!



10. As it stands now, Michael Shackleford (Wizard Of Odds) has taken up the case. He is trying to get EZ Street to agree to a meeting in Vegas where Cory will be allowed to demonstrate his speed of play in Video Poker. Cory has even agreed to take the polygraph test! EZ Street has rejected this offer, stating that Cory must first apologize to Wilheim first, and that he must drop SBR as an advocate! If he does not do these things, easystreetsports.com has no interest in talking to him!

I forgot about the lie detector lol....what a bunch of crooks!!!!

[cory1111]

avoid easystreetsports.com,they are crooks and dont pay.

[cory1111]

avoid easystreet they will be closing soon. details... coming up...

[quagmire]

ez owes 46k and wont pay, they are crooks and if you win you might not get paid and if you win big you definitely wont get paid and thats a fact!!!!!!!

[shari91]

Thread is closed until further notice.

[cory1111]

Ezstreetsports.com owes me 46k , they do not pay

EZSTREETSPORTS.COM OWES ME 46K, AND ITS BEEN A YEAR AND HALF. THEY HAVE A SISTER BOOK 7REDSPORTS.COM. BEWARE OF BOTH SPORTSBOOKS.



EasyStreet believes that the player used software to automatically make his decisions in the "Jacks or Better" game. EasyStreet maintains this position despite allegedly contradictory statements from casino software creator, Digital Gaming Solutions. DGS' owner, Chris Davis, reportedly spoke with the player and personally indicated that no abnormalities were found from analyzing his game sessions.

It is unclear if EasyStreet is in possession of evidence to justify confiscating the player's winnings. Thus far they have only argued that a human could not average so many hands per hour without deviating from good to perfect strategy.

It has been noted from some readers that the popular Jacks or Better game does not require an overly mathematical mind to play perfectly. In addition, EasyStreet had the "hold winning hands" option enabled, so that if a pair of jacks or greater were dealt, those cards would automatically be held so that the player could choose to draw only the remaining cards.

The second argument raised by EasyStreet is that the player hit three royal flushes in his winning run. EasyStreet has attempted to discredit the legitimacy of the play by pointing out that the player hit three royal flushes in a small sample size. EasyStreet only quoted the amount of hands played in winning sessions, not all sessions, thus no accurate statistical analysis can be performed.

SBR's mediator Justin7 is preparing a new video review on this dispute. Justin intends to focus on the RX Forum's decision to side with their forum advertiser, EasyStreet Sportsbook. Justin's previous video on this sportsbook casino complaint can be found in this EasyStreet casino winner dispute.

[PLA]

Not this again

[minet123]

Go away
you admitted on camera you did charge backs
it's bad enough having to deal with all the bs banking crap because of the us gov't
but when players add on with sleaze ball tactics to scam books out of money
that cost everyone in the end
you don't deserve a cent

[cory1111]

Hello Cory, should I take that as a refusal of Easystreet's offer? If so then we can close the matter with a post here at the Rx.com of your decision to Easystreet's offer or do you want to keep your options open until the deadline of 5PM EDT on March 30th? The offer is firm and the polygraph and demonstration of your play at DGS non-negotiable if you want to be paid your funds. Totally up to you to prove to Easystreet you can do what you claim you can do and that your are telling the truth that you did not break any rules while playing at Easystret by using AI or any other kind of device to play the afore mentioned video poker game.

Regarding the Polygraph Company, Easystreet will compile a list of several reputable companies in the San Jose are and allow me to select the one they use. You sent me this email today in case you forgot:
Regards,Wilheim

[cory1111]

Minet all cash deposits.Thank-you.


<object height="250" width="300" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/FAOcA_ZmcWY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></object>

[cory1111]

I will pass that along to Alex. I need you to understand that I am doing all I can to help you but I cannot force any of our sponsors to do something differently than they routinely do. Alex promised me an honest report and invited me to their offices when the report is completed so that everything he tells me is transparent..This most recent report is apparently being done by the Software Company that developed the game.

I will give Easystreet 48 hours and call them again. I also have no problem visiting their facility to view all evidence that is discovered. We rarely get disputes involving Video Poker (I was surprised to learn that this was how you won your money because you failed to mention it in your email which is no big deal).

Have you contacted SBR regarding this matter, if so I have no problem inviting Bill Dozer to accompany me on the visit to Easystreet when the time comes to corroborate all claims. Of course if the software company rules in your favor then a visit will not be necessary.

This is a complicated matter and it calls for patience on both our parts. I know that is easy for me to say but it is the truth which is what we all want to see come out..

Regards, wilheim

Wilheim
Head Moderator
The Rx.com Posting Forum

[sharpcat]

Easystreet is a solid book

[cory1111]

And yet Sharpcat they are rated a D at SBR????

[HedgeHog]

And yet Sharpcat they are rated a D at SBR????

Betonline is rated B+ and is on the SBR recommended list, despite multiple theft attempts, so what's your point? SBR ratings, while generally useful, can be significantly off in cases where SBR has a vested interest. Such is the case with EZ and BOL as SBR prejudice influences both ratings greatly.

PS SBR must be desperate for traffic to bring this garbage thread back. Guess we can look forward to months of spamming the same crap over and over again.

[cory1111]

HH, for someone so worried about Betonline how come you dont start your own thread about them? Instead your worried about me posting about a garbage sportsbook that doesnt pay. You must be desperate for attention yourself since your posting about something that doesnt pertain to you? And congratulations on your duo role in this scene.

[cory1111]

Avoid also 7redsports.com, EZstreet is rumored to be merging into one sportsbook, claiming new management when basically its the same management and same owners.

[skrtelfan]

EZ Street farts on cakes!

[Legions36]

Easystreet always paid me. Also noted just because a book is a D doesn't mean as much to me anymore as from using betrevolution D+ lol thats the funniest grade ever, that book is so good and properly run i can't even tell u where the hell that grade came from. Also from playing with easy that grade seems way off as well. All i know is some kind of flaw somewhere but that doesn't mean i wont play without caution, im giving them action just not all my action.

[skrtelfan]

EZ Street are crooks! Boo EZ Street!

[cory1111]

avoid Ezstreetsports,they dont pay.

[cory1111]

Cory, I am not going to comment now on any of last two emails except to tell you I am assuming by this statement "The polygraph test will not be taking" that you are refusing the offer made by Easystreet and The Rx.com to give you a chance to prove you deserve to be paid your balance in full by flying from the Miami area to San Jose (an easy flight) and taking two tests that if it were me in your shoes would row a boat to Costa Rica to prove.

I will post a copy of the offer on our forum along with a little bit of background on the case but will not post any confidential information about you such as your real name or email address, and your IP...You will simply be known as Cory1111.

Please consider the matter concluded between us now that you have refused an all expenses paid trip to Costa Rica in which you could beyond a doubt prove your innocence. Your reluctance to take Easystreet up on the offer only leads me to believe that you have something to hide. You have lied to me, contradicted yourself, and are trying to use these forums to your advantage when it is clear by your refusal to come to CR that you are guilty of foul play.

Players like you are the reason books require so much documentation from honest players these days. I find this entire effort by you shameful as we both know that hitting those three Royals in that brief of a time plus the other two at another book in even less time back in late November is a virtual impossibility, these are just the ones we know of. Extensive research went into that fact alone, all of it resulting in agreement with Easystreet that you broke clearly posted casino play rules to hit the Royals.

Regards, wilheim

Wilheim
Head Moderator
The Rx.com Posting Forum

[skrtelfan]

Wilhelm is a liar! The Wizard of Odds verified that Cory's royal rate was not that unusual! 1 in 50 as I remember!

[darkhat]

The RX is a joke...