You know why? Because that's the number of books that treat winners like dirt. How come Pinnacle can accept a $50k bet and Bet365 and others can't accept a €5 bet on the same event? Imagine raking in billions each year but not allowing even peanut bets on major events because you might lose 10% of the peanut in the long term. It's akin to a Fortune 50 company not buying toilet paper for their bathrooms because it would cut into profit their margins, except there is no such company.
Speaking of 365, they first lowered my limits, then removed the Cash Out Button, then removed the Bet Max button, without saying anything. Because max betting and cashing out peanuts is just unacceptable in the biggest book in the world.
Imagine being the CEO of a company making over $2 Billion a year. You could: A) Increase the revenue by 10% by godawful measures or B) Sacrifice 10% by not being an ultra greedy ahole, which would result in better PR, more satisfied customers, more customers in general resulting in bigger turnover and ultimately just as much or possibly even more revenue as option A, with much better brand image to boot. 99.9% of Books chose option A. Oh, and about half the books have payout problems or are outright scams, says a lot about the industry.
Speaking of 365, they first lowered my limits, then removed the Cash Out Button, then removed the Bet Max button, without saying anything. Because max betting and cashing out peanuts is just unacceptable in the biggest book in the world.
Imagine being the CEO of a company making over $2 Billion a year. You could: A) Increase the revenue by 10% by godawful measures or B) Sacrifice 10% by not being an ultra greedy ahole, which would result in better PR, more satisfied customers, more customers in general resulting in bigger turnover and ultimately just as much or possibly even more revenue as option A, with much better brand image to boot. 99.9% of Books chose option A. Oh, and about half the books have payout problems or are outright scams, says a lot about the industry.