Climate Change

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Nothing to see here.

    Just a record-breaking winter heat build up in Central Australia as max temps in places like Alice Springs rise to within a degree of the SUMMER average!



    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    How does today’s extreme heat compare with Earth’s past climate?


    During a period called the Palaeocene-Eocene thermal maximum, which occurred about 55m years ago, temperatures jumped by at least 5C as carbon dioxide flooded into the atmosphere – but this change unfolded over thousands of years. By contrast, the modern world has heated up by more than 1C in little more than a century.


    “A hundred years or so is less than a blink of an eye in Earth’s history,” said Lina Pérez-Angel, a palaeoclimatologist at Brown University. “There’s nothing in Earth’s history that shows a change happening this quickly, it’s just so, so fast.

    Usually these changes take a long time, things can adapt. Right now the pace of change is one of the biggest concerns we have.”


    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    In 2009 Australia experienced it's worst heat wave ever recorded. Has not happened since.

    In 2009, and ice storm ravaged 7 states in south central U.S. Has not happened since.

    I wonder if the Globe has it's own agenda.?. Maybe.?.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    The current retreat of glaciers in the tropical Andes is unprecedented in the last 11,700 years!
    Ecosystems and communities that rely on glaciers for freshwater will be impacted even at the lowest global warming targets of 1.5°C or below.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    The end is nigh.

    For insects, bats, protest, the planet…


    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied


    nearly 4 million square kilometres below the 1981-2010 average...

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    A new daily global mean temperature record, 17.09°C, was set two days ago on 21 July, according to @CopernicusECMWF
    ERA5 reanalysis.


    Leave a comment:


  • captrobey
    replied
    Originally posted by Mac4Lyfe
    What's your point? We all are responsible for the climate. The US wouldn't be a world power if we didn't use up natural resources. We can't go back to the stone age but can do our best to reduce our impact. We need a lot of people doing a little. It's not about blaming anyone. It's about being open and honest. But you first need to believe there's a problem before you are willing to do anything about it. It doesn't look like you think there's a problem. So carry on.
    The problem is these are all Taylor Swifts planes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mac4Lyfe
    replied
    Originally posted by b1slickguy
    They used Zoom calls during the pandemic. If they were really all about "saving the planet" they would continue to do this instead of proving their true hypocrisy by flying all over the world in their private jets. They just want to have their cake and eat yours, too.
    What's wrong with flying all over the world? You don't travel? Should we go by horse and buggy? WE ALL USE ENERGY. It has increased/bettered our standard of living. We all produce carbon. I don't think it's hypocritical to talk about reducing carbon even if we all have to use it. Like I said, the US is one of the worse offenders. Technology hopefully can solve the issue. We first must recognize what we do and find better ways to do it. I've worked in coal plants. It's dirty but much better than sitting at home in the dark. The US has to have energy diversity. You don't want just one source of energy. But we also want energy that is clean, affordable and won't impact our citizens health in the long term. There's no easy solutions and one solution can't be applied to every one. Too many variables.

    Leave a comment:


  • b1slickguy
    replied
    Originally posted by Mac4Lyfe
    What's your point? We all are responsible for the climate. The US wouldn't be a world power if we didn't use up natural resources. We can't go back to the stone age but can do our best to reduce our impact. We need a lot of people doing a little. It's not about blaming anyone. It's about being open and honest. But you first need to believe there's a problem before you are willing to do anything about it. It doesn't look like you think there's a problem. So carry on.
    They used Zoom calls during the pandemic. If they were really all about "saving the planet" they would continue to do this instead of proving their true hypocrisy by flying all over the world in their private jets. They just want to have their cake and eat yours, too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mac4Lyfe
    replied
    Originally posted by b1slickguy
    What's your point? We all are responsible for the climate. The US wouldn't be a world power if we didn't use up natural resources. We can't go back to the stone age but can do our best to reduce our impact. We need a lot of people doing a little. It's not about blaming anyone. It's about being open and honest. But you first need to believe there's a problem before you are willing to do anything about it. It doesn't look like you think there's a problem. So carry on.

    Leave a comment:


  • b1slickguy
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by Mac4Lyfe
    I don't think there's one immediate solution that will solve every problem. But it comes from awareness, challenging and maybe punishing the worst offenders (the US being one of them). Freon R-22 HCFC for example was known to destroy the ozone layer, so we instilled laws to reduce it's use. Same for some pesticides that easily contaminated our water supply. Make the price prohibitive and folks will use something else.

    China is a great example. They're air pollution is so bad it kills 2 million people there a year. Building more coal plants is easy in a country that can ignore its people. They also pretty much are forced to use coal to maintain energy independence.

    But to answer your question. Nuclear energy used for electricity and to make green hydrogen is where the world will eventually go. We will be forced to go in that direction. It'll be long after you and I are gone.
    seems like the way to go.

    seems inevitable. especially with the EV's.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mac4Lyfe
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    So, my questions has always been the same. What is the solution?
    I don't think there's one immediate solution that will solve every problem. But it comes from awareness, challenging and maybe punishing the worst offenders (the US being one of them). Freon R-22 HCFC for example was known to destroy the ozone layer, so we instilled laws to reduce it's use. Same for some pesticides that easily contaminated our water supply. Make the price prohibitive and folks will use something else.

    China is a great example. They're air pollution is so bad it kills 2 million people there a year. Building more coal plants is easy in a country that can ignore its people. They also pretty much are forced to use coal to maintain energy independence.

    But to answer your question. Nuclear energy used for electricity and to make green hydrogen is where the world will eventually go. We will be forced to go in that direction. It'll be long after you and I are gone.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    China is building more coal plants but might burn less coal


    https://www.sustainabilitybynumbers....na-coal-plants

    Maybe. Interesting article. Not sure I buy it but interesting nevertheless.

    I live on this planet also and want to to be as clean as possible.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    I am not surprised. Yes climate change exists. Everyone knows this. I am more of a realist it seems. Yes we should do a better job as stewards of the planet. Should China be building 2 new coal plants every week and nearly 400 addition coal plants in the works? Do you think the pollution China makes only effects China? I am sure you have seem world wind patterns and even ocean p current patterns. How many trillions should a country spend on reducing climate change?





    We all know Greenland is melting and island will be under water etc, but the Al Gore's movie and other predictions aren't completely truthful. If one looks into those prediction, they are mostly for hundreds of years from now. Thousands in some cases.


    So, my questions has always been the same. What is the solution?
    China is building more coal plants but might burn less coal


    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by Mac4Lyfe
    So I'm not following you. On one hand you say that man can impact the climate but what? You don't think we should spend money to lesson the impact?

    Funny you mentioned $90k. I worked in a nuclear plant where it cost estimated $90k to change a light bulb. We'd hear jokes about it all the time, even some pointing out over spend. Do you know why it cost $90k to change that bulb. Because that light lit up when spent fuel in the disassembly basin went critical, meaning there were enough neutrons to create a chain reaction. The acute radioactive dose one would receive if they walked into that building would immediately kill them. We had a saying, if you walked into that building and the light went off, bend over and kiss your ass goodbye. The light bulb wasn't there for the people already in the basin, They were already dead. It was to warned anyone else from walking in. There were at least 3 safety systems tied to that bulb. Yes, it cost a shit load of money and worth every penny if you walked by it every day.
    I am not surprised. Yes climate change exists. Everyone knows this. I am more of a realist it seems. Yes we should do a better job as stewards of the planet. Should China be building 2 new coal plants every week and nearly 400 addition coal plants in the works? Do you think the pollution China makes only effects China? I am sure you have seem world wind patterns and even ocean p current patterns. How many trillions should a country spend on reducing climate change?





    We all know Greenland is melting and island will be under water etc, but the Al Gore's movie and other predictions aren't completely truthful. If one looks into those prediction, they are mostly for hundreds of years from now. Thousands in some cases.


    So, my questions has always been the same. What is the solution?

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Models predict that Earth will warm between 2 and 6 degrees Celsius in the next century.

    When global warming has happened at various times in the past two million years, it has taken the planet about
    5,000 years to warm 5 degrees.

    The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster.

    Leave a comment:


  • captrobey
    replied
    When i came to your world i came to save it. I have given you what is needed to save the human race. I have done this back in 1929 in the form of Twizzlers. If you take them and put them all together it creates a machine that eliminates all the pollutions in the Oceans and the Atmosphere. It will save all of you.

    But instead you all eat the penetrating things.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by Mac4Lyfe
    3 million people in Houston without power because of a hurricane in early July but climate deniers will say blame Mother Nature. Man has nothing to do with what we breathe, drink or eat either.
    climate has always been changing. no one is denying that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mac4Lyfe
    replied
    3 million people in Houston without power because of a hurricane in early July but climate deniers will say blame Mother Nature. Man has nothing to do with what we breathe, drink or eat either.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mac4Lyfe
    replied
    Originally posted by Hareeba!
    Everything’s About to Get a Hell of a Lot More Expensive Due to Climate Change

    ng’s About to Get a Hell of a Lot More Expensive Due to Climate Change
    Intensifying hurricanes, floods, and heat waves are wreaking havoc across the US—and on everyone’s bank accounts.

    https://www.wired.com/story/everythi...limate-change/
    I had a house in Orlando that the homeowners insurance went from $3,000 a year to $16,500 a year. I shit you not. Insurance companies have flew the coop and you can't find insurance companies. I just sold it a couple months ago. The same thing is happening in Texas and California where I have properties as well. These climate events are driving insurance companies out of business. They've had to change their risk numbers because these events are now too common.

    Leave a comment:


  • b1slickguy
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    June hottest on record, beating 2023 high: EU climate monitor

    https://insiderpaper.com/june-hottes...imate-monitor/

    Leave a comment:


  • b1slickguy
    replied
    The climate scam is the vehicle to make their communist plot a reality. They've been at this for a long time.

    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="zxx" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/jd8Aj8y1MK">pic.twitter.com/jd8Aj8y1MK</a></p>&mdash; conspiracybot (@conspiracyb0t) <a href="https://twitter.com/conspiracyb0t/status/1809308830578196508?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >July 5, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Year Named Storms Hurricanes Major
    Hurricanes
    1851 6 3 1
    1852 5 5 1
    1853 8 4 2
    1854 5 3 1
    1855 5 4 1
    1856 6 4 2
    1857 4 3 0
    1858 6 6 0
    1859 8 7 1
    ATLANTIC HURRICANE NUMBERS BY YEAR (stormfax.com)

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    Are there more hurricanes now than 50 years ago?








    No. And a search for answers about climate and hurricane connections reveals little or no evidence that major landfalling hurricanes in the Eastern United States have increased in frequency since data collection started around 1850.
    May 16, 2024


    Here is 1995 to 2017
    1995 19 11 5
    1996 13 9 6
    1997 8 3 1
    1998 14 10 3
    1999 12 8 5
    2000 15 8 3
    2001 15 9 4
    2002 12 4 2
    2003 16 7 3
    2004 15 9 6
    2005 28 15 7
    2006 10 5 2
    2007 15 6 2
    2008 16 8 5
    2009 9 3 2
    2010 19 12 5
    2011 19 7 4
    2012 19 10 2
    2013 14 2 0
    2014 8 6 2
    2015 11 4 2
    2016 15 7 4
    2017 17 10 6
    ATLANTIC HURRICANE NUMBERS BY YEAR (stormfax.com)

    Leave a comment:


  • b1slickguy
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • mcaulay777
    replied
    One nut said Climate Change is changing Phoenix causing to be hotter the last few summers.Are you this dumb you live in fng Desert!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mac4Lyfe
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    i have ever denied climate change. The climate has always been changing and will continue forever.

    Does man have an effect on climate? Of course. So does the sun. So do other things. 97% of scientists DO NOT agree that climate change is man-made. That is a false narrative.

    Follow the money like always. If you want government $ to study the mating habits of the brown squirrel, you won't get any. If you want government $ for the mating habits of the brown squirrel as it pertains to climate change, you will get millions.

    Did you already forget about covid and the billions drug companies made on an experimental drug which didn't prevent anyone from getting covid or passing it on to someone else?

    A bag of washers that would cost you $5 at Home Depot, the US military buys for $90,000.

    Don't believe everything you are told by the same people that have been caught lying to you countless times. Stop being dumb.
    So I'm not following you. On one hand you say that man can impact the climate but what? You don't think we should spend money to lesson the impact?

    Funny you mentioned $90k. I worked in a nuclear plant where it cost estimated $90k to change a light bulb. We'd hear jokes about it all the time, even some pointing out over spend. Do you know why it cost $90k to change that bulb. Because that light lit up when spent fuel in the disassembly basin went critical, meaning there were enough neutrons to create a chain reaction. The acute radioactive dose one would receive if they walked into that building would immediately kill them. We had a saying, if you walked into that building and the light went off, bend over and kiss your ass goodbye. The light bulb wasn't there for the people already in the basin, They were already dead. It was to warned anyone else from walking in. There were at least 3 safety systems tied to that bulb. Yes, it cost a shit load of money and worth every penny if you walked by it every day.

    Leave a comment:


  • OldBill
    replied
    wit hold up TRUMP said WE had the best water and climate control ever

    Leave a comment:


  • b1slickguy
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Experts predicted climate change would wipe out tiny islands like the one below.<br><br>Turns out, many are actually GROWING. <a href="https://t.co/9NzFN91imz">pic.twitter.com/9NzFN91imz</a></p>&mdash; End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) <a href="https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1806311939468935318?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >June 27, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by Mac4Lyfe
    ^^ Dwight - stop being dumb. Global warming, climate change is a real thing. Get your head out of your ass. It doesn't mean you have to do anything about it, because you are stuck in your own mind but denying it, even after every fukking person with a brain is telling you otherwise is just not smart.

    Let me give you 2 examples of how MAN can impact nature. There's chemicals that are so toxic that a few cups can contaminate an entire water supply. Water pollution is very real. Then you have overfishing which impacts billions of people. So man can very easily impact our greatest resource... Water.
    i have ever denied climate change. The climate has always been changing and will continue forever.

    Does man have an effect on climate? Of course. So does the sun. So do other things. 97% of scientists DO NOT agree that climate change is man-made. That is a false narrative.

    Follow the money like always. If you want government $ to study the mating habits of the brown squirrel, you won't get any. If you want government $ for the mating habits of the brown squirrel as it pertains to climate change, you will get millions.

    Did you already forget about covid and the billions drug companies made on an experimental drug which didn't prevent anyone from getting covid or passing it on to someone else?

    A bag of washers that would cost you $5 at Home Depot, the US military buys for $90,000.

    Don't believe everything you are told by the same people that have been caught lying to you countless times. Stop being dumb.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mac4Lyfe
    replied
    ^^ Dwight - stop being dumb. Global warming, climate change is a real thing. Get your head out of your ass. It doesn't mean you have to do anything about it, because you are stuck in your own mind but denying it, even after every fukking person with a brain is telling you otherwise is just not smart.

    Let me give you 2 examples of how MAN can impact nature. There's chemicals that are so toxic that a few cups can contaminate an entire water supply. Water pollution is very real. Then you have overfishing which impacts billions of people. So man can very easily impact our greatest resource... Water.

    Leave a comment:

Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
Working...