Why do so many US intelligence chiefs become media pundits?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ericc
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 08-05-08
    • 8278

    #1
    Why do so many US intelligence chiefs become media pundits?
    Whatever faults and flaws such journalism suffers from, I quote from one hate fan, “it’s a damn sight better than the state-controlled and state-manipulated news media in China”.

    Retiring from being in charge of intelligence, counter-intelligence and counterterrorism to working as mainstream news commentators, this has become an established career path in the US; now you can rest assured of the objectivity and independence of the world’s greatest democratic free press


    Maybe she is right. But at least we all know media outlets in China are either owned or controlled and monitored by state authorities. It may be argued, and I do argue, it’s far more insidious when news outlets claim to be independent and objective when they are not.

    This is how a 2017 article in the Columbia Journalism Review wrote about him (Michael Hayden): “It doesn’t matter what cable channel you prefer (CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News), what talk show you watch (The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, Real Time with Bill Maher), or website you read (The New York Times, The Washington Post, or The Wall Street Journal), Hayden is everywhere, commenting on the day’s news, while inevitably being portrayed as Mr Reasonable: a post-partisan straight shooter who will tell you How It Really Works.

    “But members of the media who play along with this fantasyland portrayal of Hayden should be embarrassed.”



    Lawfare Executive Editor Susan Hennessey announced this week she’s taking a job at the [Justice] department’s National Security Division

    “Lawfare began in 2010 as a national security blog, though by the Trump era it had become an unabashed mouthpiece for the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency, and partisan enough to marinate in the anti-Trump fever swamps.” [from the Wall Street Journal]
  • MinnesotaFats
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 12-18-10
    • 14758

    #2
    Because they retain their access and privileges to information in the intelligence community.

    Frankly, I feel once retired both the badge and access should be cut off completely, but this is what liberals do...the are the elite, they protect their own.
    Comment
    • The Kraken
      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
      • 12-25-11
      • 28918

      #3
      Originally posted by MinnesotaFats
      Because they retain their access and privileges to information in the intelligence community.

      Frankly, I feel once retired both the badge and access should be cut off completely, but this is what liberals do...the are the elite, they protect their own.
      You are incapable or rational thought or discussion
      Comment
      • KVB
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 05-29-14
        • 74817

        #4
        Comment
        • MinnesotaFats
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 12-18-10
          • 14758

          #5
          Originally posted by The Kraken
          You are incapable or rational thought or discussion
          Ok, discuss

          Do you believe retired intelligence community members should retain their access to information, files and credentials to enter the facilities....and then discuss this on TV?

          Change my mind....
          Comment
          • mtneer1212
            SBR MVP
            • 06-22-08
            • 4993

            #6
            Because the real money is in the subsequent book deal, not the government job.
            Comment
            • The Kraken
              BARRELED IN @ SBR!
              • 12-25-11
              • 28918

              #7
              Originally posted by MinnesotaFats
              Ok, discuss

              Do you believe retired intelligence community members should retain their access to information, files and credentials to enter the facilities....and then discuss this on TV?

              Change my mind....
              No, and it has nothing to do with their political affiliation. If that is all you had wrote, I would've simply agreed but you had to take it a step further as if only liberals protect their own.

              And Im beyond thinking anyone here will ever change their minds. And even if they would I honestly don't want to be the one to spend all the time to help it happen.
              Comment
              • MinnesotaFats
                SBR Posting Legend
                • 12-18-10
                • 14758

                #8
                Originally posted by The Kraken
                No, and it has nothing to do with their political affiliation. If that is all you had wrote, I would've simply agreed but you had to take it a step further as if only liberals protect their own.

                And Im beyond thinking anyone here will ever change their minds. And even if they would I honestly don't want to be the one to spend all the time to help it happen.
                Frankly, the recent issues at the DOJ and the CIA have all been liberals/ anti Trump oriented.

                The fact CNN & MSNBC & CBS still use that bald fukk from the CIA that Trump had revoked his retired credentials for leaking classified information is proof enough that it isn't to promote a free press but rather a bias, agenda driven narrative fueled by privileged insiders who overwhelming belong to one political orientation.
                Comment
                • hehfest
                  SBR Hall of Famer
                  • 09-28-08
                  • 7934

                  #9
                  Because they are... EVIL WALKED-IN WETWEAR ZOMBIE ZIONITES.
                  Comment
                  SBR Contests
                  Collapse
                  Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                  Collapse
                  Working...