Lol that was a chapelle sketch
Pack of Pussies in Minneapolis (VIDEO)
Collapse
X
-
King MayanSBR Posting Legend
- 09-22-10
- 21326
#36Comment -
spro23SBR MVP
- 07-17-15
- 1129
#37When whites become minority this will become more frequent like a 3rd world country.Comment -
MinnesotaFatsSBR Posting Legend
- 12-18-10
- 14758
#40Just have to limit voting rights. Property owners only. You don't own property, you don't have 'skin in the game', you don't get a vote.
That solves EVERYTHINGComment -
The KrakenBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-25-11
- 28918
#42
Many choose not to own
Owning property means nothing. It certainly does not mean you are more deserving to vote.
It would only further oppress the lower classComment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#43
Riiiiiight.
Un fukin real fatty.
Yet, not far from where we are today.
Comment -
MinnesotaFatsSBR Posting Legend
- 12-18-10
- 14758
#44
This is the great disconnect. Too many persons vote themselves more benefits from government than they contribute. The result of this is that they become susceptible to political pandering. It's enticement.
Regardless of their choices to own or not to own, to eliminate political pandering and increase the general respect for private property rights (and crime reduction), a sure fire solution is restrictions on voting rights, at least until the Government eliminates public benefits.Comment -
vinnykal2323SBR Wise Guy
- 10-04-18
- 627
#45sanctuary states/cities are a big problemComment -
swordsandtequilaSBR Hall of Famer
- 02-23-12
- 9758
#46If you're not paying into the city/county/state treasury via property tax, why should you get yo vote on any benefit from the city/county/state treasury.
This is the great disconnect. Too many persons vote themselves more benefits from government than they contribute. The result of this is that they become susceptible to political pandering. It's enticement.
Regardless of their choices to own or not to own, to eliminate political pandering and increase the general respect for private property rights (and crime reduction), a sure fire solution is restrictions on voting rights, at least until the Government eliminates public benefits.Comment -
MinnesotaFatsSBR Posting Legend
- 12-18-10
- 14758
#47
Those who fail to respect peoples rights, property rights, commit crimes and are violent actually get punished instead of segregated as a class of victims and turned into a voting bloc.
The Constitution grants us rights that no individual or group of individuals holding power can diminish, so the "fear" that 1 property owner runs the show is unfounded.
The real fear should be a "group of non property owners" running the show....because if people who don't have skin in the game, who don't contribute to the public treasury, are consistently voting themselves financial benefits and new laws or restrictions to protect and benefit themselves, then we have list respect for private property....and then there can be no wealth, no law and no order, because at that point you are essentially a banana republic....which is where we are headed when the losers in this video are treated equally to the hard working men an women who built and paid for the park and public space they loiter in and use to attack innocent victims and commit crime.
All people may be born equal, but we are not all equal in the end. Some are better than others. The better people should have their votes weighted more.Comment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#48
The losers in that video, if convicted, could lose there right to vote.
A business owner who doesn't own property has plenty of skin in the game guy and plenty of legislation that concerns him.
Get real.Comment -
MinnesotaFatsSBR Posting Legend
- 12-18-10
- 14758
#49
A business owner presumably owns a home....
The losers in this video presumably rent in either a subsidized environment or a place with background check restrictions and/ eviction restrictions.
In Minneapolis we have new legislation that prohibits landlords from doing background checks or evicting residents for failure to pay rent. That's right....needs to be a secondary cause and you cannot fail to rent due to a background check.
I wonder if those laws and benefits of those laws were voted to protect private property or if they were political pandering.....
It's just one example, there are dozens more. I cannot think of any other solution to fix our country's issues other than to limit voting to the productive, because if the productive want to vote themselves public benefit, at least it's their money, and if they want to vote or entitlement expansion, hey- it's their money!Comment -
mngamblerSBR MVP
- 08-01-11
- 2890
#50Mpls a 3rd world sh*thole infested with somalisComment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
-
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#52This thread title is incredibly misleading considering the source if ya know what i mean!!Comment -
thechaozSBR Posting Legend
- 10-23-09
- 12154
#55The losers would lose their right to vote? No.
A business owner presumably owns a home....
The losers in this video presumably rent in either a subsidized environment or a place with background check restrictions and/ eviction restrictions.
In Minneapolis we have new legislation that prohibits landlords from doing background checks or evicting residents for failure to pay rent. That's right....needs to be a secondary cause and you cannot fail to rent due to a background check.
I wonder if those laws and benefits of those laws were voted to protect private property or if they were political pandering.....
It's just one example, there are dozens more. I cannot think of any other solution to fix our country's issues other than to limit voting to the productive, because if the productive want to vote themselves public benefit, at least it's their money, and if they want to vote or entitlement expansion, hey- it's their money!Comment -
The KrakenBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-25-11
- 28918
#56Fats Im not sure you understand (or maybe you do) the implications of what you are saying. But you are a shitty person. You might be educated, you might get along with people around you, you are probably mildly accomplished but you are not a decent person.
You are no doubt a narcissist and a sociopath. You are fine if others suffer as long as you maintain status over them. You were clearly driven to succeed but you never strived for decency or virtues.
Im telling you brother, your moral compass is broken.
And I know you dont care, narcissistic sociopaths never do. As long as you’re comfortable, everything is okComment -
sourtwistSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-10-12
- 9364
#57
I'm ready to leave my house right now to look for a fight
This is a messed up world...and I don't care who the victim is or was, I'd be right there with him against all of these animalsComment -
sourtwistSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-10-12
- 9364
-
MrSinkSBR Hall of Famer
- 12-30-08
- 8087
#59Hope they are in prison nowComment -
The KrakenBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-25-11
- 28918
#60I would meet you out there if I knew with certainty we would cross paths with those guys. Sadly we would hurt some of them really badly and end up in jail, yet somehow they’ll continue to walk free after what they didComment -
RudyRuetiggerSBR Aristocracy
- 08-24-10
- 65084
#61i pay a shit ton in property taxes
i pay out the fukkin ass on insurance dealing with it
when the govt comes to put in a pipeline through my property, or buy some land to expand the road (whether its 1 year or 100 years).....ill (as in my family lineage) be paid over the value of the land by the govt..........sounds great, until you realizes.........IT WAS MY FUKKIN MONEY to begin with
I don't want to hear whoreshit about mowing side of roads, painting lines, and paving roads. its a goddamn scam where they take a shit ton and provide nothing
still, no way id only allow only property owners to vote
hey fats relax your shitComment -
HmanSBR Posting Legend
- 11-04-17
- 21429
#62Would loved to have walked up on the while packin and mowed them all downComment -
The KrakenBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-25-11
- 28918
#63Yep. The unfortunate reality is if you or I walked up on that scene and engaged even without a weapon, we would likely face more severe punishment than any of them...
With that said, I would stomp on a few airwaysComment -
DiggityDaggityDoSBR Aristocracy
- 11-30-08
- 81450
#64Not too much though.
Don't want to end up like this:
Comment -
HmanSBR Posting Legend
- 11-04-17
- 21429
#66Comment -
swordsandtequilaSBR Hall of Famer
- 02-23-12
- 9758
#68Not too much though.
Don't want to end up like this:
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...l#post28889727Comment -
slambamSBR MVP
- 02-07-10
- 1653
#69I read up on this a bit...
Frey wants 14 new cops hired over the next year, but both proposals have met with pushback from the City Council as well as members of the black community
Lol gee I wonder why...Comment -
dlowillySBR Posting Legend
- 11-09-16
- 13862
#70Thrilla? Kingdom? Venom72? Where my boyz at?Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code