-
Comment -
If he only would be a guy that happens to believe in Religion....
But no, he is a creationist
The dumbest of the dumb. The simplest of the simple minds.
There is absolutely no arguing with idiots, sorry.
I'd happily discuss with religious people, with all respect and everything. Creationists are scum though. Zero respect for a guy like him whatsoever.Comment -
I'm not a scientist... These guys are, write them and blurt your nonsense...
Darwinism was an interesting idea in the 19th century, when handwaving explanations gave a plausible, if not properly scientific, framework into which we could fit biological facts. However, what we have learned since the days of Darwin throws doubt on natural selection's ability to create complex biological systems - and we still have little more than handwaving as an argument in its favour.
Professor Colin Reeves
Dept of Mathematical Sciences
Coventry University
Dr. Ralph Seelke
Edward Peltzer
Ph.D. Oceanography, University of California, San Diego (Scripps Institute)
Associate Editor, Marine ChemistryComment -
You are really THAT dumb right?
If a math professor told you 2+2=7.4 you would easily bwlieve him and quote him as "proof" that it makes way more sense than accepting that 2+2=4.Comment -
The overwhelming majority of scientists accept that evolution is a far more convincing theory than creationism, yet you are dumb enough to side with the few lousy losers who against better knowledge insist on their opinion that 2+2=7.4
Can't make this shit up, for real.Comment -
I am done toying around with you here.
Can't have a discussion with mentally challenged people.Comment