-
Comment -
I'm glad to see that you speak for the entire forum.
How could it possibly be any of your ****ing business what I do? Don't remember asserting that I know everything there is to know about gambling. But, this is just another one of your lies. Are you a fag or something? You follow me around from thread to thread posting your bullshit, all lies. Do you have a crush on me? I hate to disappoint you but I have a lovely young girlfriend and I am not gay. So go find a gay playmate somewhere else, I am not interested.
F-u-c-k you donjuan you ****ing piece of shit.Comment -
As eloquent and articulate as ever.Comment -
i think every system will fail you evetually , i mean this game we call football basketballl etc, is not an exact science.......... i think certain systems will make you money temporarily but not forever........ i think if you can hop on the ones that are currently working and get off when they go to shiii , that is a smart stragedy to use, kinda like what you would do in the stock market ........ feel meComment -
No, I don't feel you. Most systems that are "currently working" are just the product of variance. If you call line shopping a system, then that is one that will not fail you eventually.Comment -
their calling it a system not me ........... get ya facts str8Comment -
I don't think anyone brought up line shopping until I did.Comment -
Hmm, thanks.. I will play it, i like it also, and lets see
Comment -
Is this just for...
NBA?
-110 lines?
Any sport?
Any sport where the team is -110?
Thank you...Comment -
I wouldn't attempt it with anything but NBA
NFL would have too few games, system doesn't kick in until after 20 games, presumably to make winning percentages more meaningful.
MLB would have pitching as too much of a factor
NHL has lines that aren't equaled out by pointspreads
CFB is a short season
CBB doesn't play that many games.Comment -
Doug,Originally Posted by LarryLegend
This was the one and only formula I was ever given.
I know for bases there is the "paypal" one that was posted earlier this year. From the same guy taht had the NBA chase system.
The bases one chased teams that were swept earlier in the year.
But this is my (courtesy of Walt) is all I got for now.
Do you know these two systems?Comment -
I don't like a chase system, seems it has you betting too large if it gets to a 3rd game ( or whatever). Some seem to well with it in NHL, but its not for me, so I don't know those systems.
Larry has produced a record that is unbelievable ( but true), and it's flat betting.Comment -
I'm very familiar with the chase system above. If you start with a $20,000+ bankroll on the year, it'll work out great. I do use the system, have been for two years, but only as a backup plan to my regular picks. If I ever have a losing year, this makes up for it. If I don't, which has been the case since I started using it, it's extra money in the bank. You can make an extra $500-$1000 a week no problem. It deals with a 3 game out of conference road series.Comment -
Larry is now claiming only 3 losses.
But as a joke.Comment -
His records look fine to me. RX'ers would catch anything questionable. He's 2-2 since he caught my attention.
LarryLegend
RX Member
LarryLegend's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ny
Posts: 311
Default
Wed Jan 16th
No plays tongiht
Loss last night ytd 28-5-1
(if you can find N.O. at -9.5, then it is a play. but right now i have it ar 10.5)Comment -
Uh, no. Chase systems=donkey shizz.I'm very familiar with the chase system above. If you start with a $20,000+ bankroll on the year, it'll work out great.Comment -
It's a progressive Martingale ( or is it Martindale ?), whatever. It has a point where you bet too much, you rely on not getting there.
I don't mind varying bet size by say 1-5X, but that's about the limit.Comment -
thought you meant a joke by Larry !
I don't get L's motive to post it, but its done. I want Ganch to examine it, but he hasn't yet.
I'm no easy sucker to get to follow a system.Comment -
The whole point is that you can't magically turn a ton of -ev bets into +ev bets by chasing. If the bets are +ev in the first place you should just bet Kelly (or fractional Kelly as a margin of error).It has a point where you bet too much, you rely on not getting there.Comment -
Of course Kelly is one of the best money management theories out there for capping. I'm not knocking that. I cap all my own games. However, I do play the chase system in a seperate acct, as extra money, and I've done well with it the past couple years. $9,000 the first year, $16,000 last year, and I'll let ya know what this year comes out to, when the NBA season ends. I'm not saying bet your whole roll on it, or give up capping yourself (i'd hate that, to me it's a fun hobby), but hey, who can't use another 10-15k? If you have a big roll, and an extra $200 or whatever it is now, it's worth checking out. That's all I was sayin.
Comment -
It's not a long term winner. I'd rather grow my bankroll optimally.Comment -
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryLegend View Post
Friday Jan 18th
As of right now there are 4 possible plays
Det - 9
Atl + 6.5
Port - 4.5 if Brandon Roy plays
Sea + 6 if Chris Wilcox plays (sea is 0-5 without him and 1-1 with him in limited minutes)
Do not post in here, thanx. I will update later, as well as in the nba forum.
No injuries that I can find, so all of the above 4 games are plays for today.Comment -
I go away, get to the hotel and the net is down, now I get the net and find out the plays. It doesn't look like he had a good night 1-3 as I already bet the raps and the blazers. I don't know if the two guys listed as must play did play.Comment -
when Larry makes it a play, it's official for record purposes. He won't say it doesn't count because somebody didn't start.
The system has lost since I noticed him at 26-3-1, I think its gone 3-5 since then.Comment
