These Umpires are Assuming

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GiveMeaBJ
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 09-08-09
    • 8449

    #1
    These Umpires are Assuming
    As an umpire one thing you can't do is assume. You can't not see a call clearly and make a call based on reactions of players, coaches, or fans. You have to call how you see. Anyone who is watching the Mets game knows these umpires just cost the Mets a run by assuming.

    Bases loaded, no outs, Scott Rolen up, 1-1 game. 2-2 count, Rolen check swings (very close to going around). Rolen heads for first base saying it hit him, umpire calls it a caught foul ball for a strike out. Now in reality the ball didn't hit the bat. He may have went around and it may have hit him. After watching five slow-mo replays I still can't tell if it hit him or not. The home plate ump called a strikeout. The umpires huddled and the two umpires doing most of the talking (2nd and 3rd base) have there hands over their mouths while talking. Why? Who can't see what there saying? They are supposed to talk about the rule and what happened. Now if I can't tell if the ball hit him with a zoom in on slow mo then how does the 2nd base ump have a better call then the home plate ump.

    I think I know what happened the umps covered their mouths and assumed off of Rolens reaction (he was halfway to 1st when he found out he got called for a K) that the ball didn't hit his bat and may have hit his jersey.

    It's impossible to reverse that call on the field and why did they cover their mouths?
  • Brock Landers
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 06-30-08
    • 45359

    #2
    Fukking Pelfrey implodes after the call too

    Fuk this bullshit
    Comment
    • big joe 1212
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 06-01-08
      • 19380

      #3
      I can't see how a guy that far away overrules a guy 20 inches away from the play!
      Comment
      • 2daBank
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 01-26-09
        • 88966

        #4
        i thought it hit him, of coarse i had money on cincy so i may be a little biased, but i know you a met fan so you a little bias as well.......
        Comment
        • big joe 1212
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 06-01-08
          • 19380

          #5
          Originally posted by 2daBank
          i thought it hit him, of coarse i had money on cincy so i may be a little biased, but i know you a met fan so you a little bias as well.......
          I'm a Met fan and I think it hit him!

          I just can't see how a guy that far away can overrule the umpire that is right there!

          He obviously overruled because of the reaction, not because he was 100% sure.
          Comment
          • GiveMeaBJ
            SBR Hall of Famer
            • 09-08-09
            • 8449

            #6
            Originally posted by 2daBank
            i thought it hit him, of coarse i had money on cincy so i may be a little biased, but i know you a met fan so you a little bias as well.......
            True and after seeing the replay it definitley came closer to hitting him then the bat. BUT, the argument still remains how someone 100 feet away could possibly reverse a call of a man one foot away. Not to mention I saw the replay five times and I still can't tell if it hit him or not.
            Comment
            • Brock Landers
              SBR Aristocracy
              • 06-30-08
              • 45359

              #7
              cost the Mets the game, and me a chunk of cash, a load of shit
              Comment
              • KingKolzig
                SBR Hall of Famer
                • 02-02-10
                • 5550

                #8
                Originally posted by Brock Landers
                cost the Mets the game, and me a chunk of cash, a load of shit
                if u just pull one pepperoni of each pie that u deliver for say the next 15 yrs, then resell all that pepperoni, you will get ur losses back on this game
                Comment
                • Ryangene
                  Restricted User
                  • 12-04-08
                  • 3381

                  #9
                  They need to start giving fines for bad calls. If we screwed up that bad at our jobs we'd be fired.
                  Comment
                  • 2daBank
                    SBR Aristocracy
                    • 01-26-09
                    • 88966

                    #10
                    Originally posted by GiveMeaBJ
                    True and after seeing the replay it definitley came closer to hitting him then the bat. BUT, the argument still remains how someone 100 feet away could possibly reverse a call of a man one foot away. Not to mention I saw the replay five times and I still can't tell if it hit him or not.


                    yea it really hard to tell and you right the guy from 2nd base shouldnt be making the call, but hey that what happens when there a pitcher change and money comes pouring in on the Mets, cincy gonna get the calls, that is why they were covering there mouths
                    Comment
                    • 2daBank
                      SBR Aristocracy
                      • 01-26-09
                      • 88966

                      #11
                      but i gotta say if the home plate ump was convinced that the ball hit something (which it appears he was) then they made the right call cause it clearly didnt hit the bat imo.......
                      Comment
                      • GiveMeaBJ
                        SBR Hall of Famer
                        • 09-08-09
                        • 8449

                        #12
                        Originally posted by 2daBank
                        but i gotta say if the home plate up was convinced that the ball hit something (which it appears he was) then they made the right call cause it clearly didnt hit the bat imo.......
                        Here is another thing though. In my opinion on the check swing he went around (it was very close) if he did it's a K. The umpire should have appealed to first before they converged for a conversation.

                        Or maybe I am a bitter Met fan grasping at straws.
                        Comment
                        • 2daBank
                          SBR Aristocracy
                          • 01-26-09
                          • 88966

                          #13
                          no i agree it was real close to being a swing, didnt watch it live so didnt see if they appealed to 1st or how it all really went down but it should of been appealed for sure......
                          Comment
                          Search
                          Collapse
                          SBR Contests
                          Collapse
                          Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                          Collapse
                          Working...