Nuclear power is portrayed by the major media and by environmental activists as dangerous and perhaps even sinister. Wind power, on the other hand, is considered benign. But the track records of nuclear power and wind power present a different picture.
Nuclear Power
Nuclear power has been been used to produce electricity for more than four decades, beginning with the Shippingport nuclear power plant in 1957. Today there are 104 nuclear power plants in the United States generating some 60 billion kilowatt hours per year of electricity. There have been no deaths from radiation in more than 40 years of American nuclear plant operations. Even considering the "catastrophe" at Three Mile Island, there has not been a single case of injury to any member of the public. (There were fatalities at the Russian Chernobyl plant, but that plant was radically different from an American nuclear power plant. It did not even have a containment structured around the nuclear reactor.) Nuclear Power
Wind Power
How about wind power? How does it fare compared to the perfect record of the American nuclear power industry? Believe it or not, there is an organization, the Caithness Windfarm Information Forum, that keeps data on wind-power-related accidents and/or design problems. Caithness is based in Great Britain, where homeowners have already grown tired of the noise and other wind-turbine-generated problems. Their "Summary of Wind Turbine Accident Data to 31 December 2008" reports 41 worker fatalities. Most, not unexpectedly, were from falling as they are typically working on turbines some thirty stories above the ground. In addition, Caithness attributed the deaths of 16 members of the public to wind-turbine accidents.
So are you Pro-Nuclear or Pro-Wind?
Is difficult to decide which is better. If nuclear power plants are treated with such respect as in the USA then it is a solution for the energy problems of the world.
A country will only be able to have a Nuclear Power Plant when the country trust that their own people will not be lazy, and hard working.
USA trust their people to keep their plants in high standards, to avoid any fatal accident.
After reading this article I realized that the USA doesnt need wind or solar power or any other kind of eco-friendly energy producer.
Original Source : http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech-m...-30/energy/788
How about wind power? How does it fare compared to the perfect record of the American nuclear power industry? Believe it or not, there is an organization, the Caithness Windfarm Information Forum, that keeps data on wind-power-related accidents and/or design problems. Caithness is based in Great Britain, where homeowners have already grown tired of the noise and other wind-turbine-generated problems. Their "Summary of Wind Turbine Accident Data to 31 December 2008" reports 41 worker fatalities. Most, not unexpectedly, were from falling as they are typically working on turbines some thirty stories above the ground. In addition, Caithness attributed the deaths of 16 members of the public to wind-turbine accidents.
So are you Pro-Nuclear or Pro-Wind?
Is difficult to decide which is better. If nuclear power plants are treated with such respect as in the USA then it is a solution for the energy problems of the world.
A country will only be able to have a Nuclear Power Plant when the country trust that their own people will not be lazy, and hard working.
USA trust their people to keep their plants in high standards, to avoid any fatal accident.
After reading this article I realized that the USA doesnt need wind or solar power or any other kind of eco-friendly energy producer.
Original Source : http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech-m...-30/energy/788