1. #36
    pilebuck13
    pilebuck13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-15-15
    Posts: 17,889
    Betpoints: 1717

    Quote Originally Posted by JayDr3am View Post
    every sport all i bet is dogs and unders. very seldom see me on a favorite and an over
    Why not bet a over total bets over under aren't they all to be treated in appropriate manners?

  2. #37
    omega
    omega's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-20-14
    Posts: 1,201
    Betpoints: 2370

    Easy? They barely won by one run. Anyone that laid -300 on the Nats today will soon be broke.

  3. #38
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    Of course it wasn't easy I think we're just playing around

    Canuck owes every shark in Saskatchewan

  4. #39
    pilebuck13
    pilebuck13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-15-15
    Posts: 17,889
    Betpoints: 1717

    Quote Originally Posted by jjgold View Post
    Of course it wasn't easy I think we're just playing around

    Canuck owes every shark in Saskatchewan
    Gold remember when u had that late night escape out of Vegas over a miss communication on a hockey bet? What happened to that thread?

  5. #40
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    We removed it buckles

  6. #41
    JayDr3am
    Handi
    JayDr3am's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-06-14
    Posts: 18,259
    Betpoints: 8206

    Quote Originally Posted by pilebuck13 View Post
    Why not bet a over total bets over under aren't they all to be treated in appropriate manners?
    just my style of capping.. and i said its seldom. very rare, but it does happen.

  7. #42
    vividjohn45
    vividjohn45's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-21-10
    Posts: 6,331
    Betpoints: 578

    I liked padres +2.5 ats but at -145 it was priced to high. Now what was the price of the nats ml? -2.5 was +115. Lol.

  8. #43
    vividjohn45
    vividjohn45's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-21-10
    Posts: 6,331
    Betpoints: 578

    Its 1:1 on wagering. This means you needs to win 53% to turn profit. Im about to drop outta sbr twitter group pool cuz they allow dumbfucks to wager like boston ml tonite at -240. Or nats strasburg -220. When they loss the group is ******. Lol. Its gauged to losers who wager -200+ on a fuggin baseball game. Im outta that shit. And i went 3-1 at even money wagers in that pool. But some nimrod bets nats -220 and knocks my wins out. Actually losing my wins.and some more juice loss. Nimrods. Done with juiced up nimrods who cant research a sharper even money play.

  9. #44
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    I will tell you the big chalk rarely wins easy anymore in baseball

  10. #45
    Sam Odom
    Sam Odom's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-30-05
    Posts: 58,063
    Betpoints: 37

    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Odom View Post
    Just bet SD RL +2 (-103)

    SD +300

    @ Heritage

    made a little... could have made a lot

    JJ , stop tailing Brock!!

  11. #46
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    Sammy not a bad call

  12. #47
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 31,511
    Betpoints: 24869

    No juice when u win.

First 12
Top