Anyone laying -310 plus on Washington Nats ?

[pilebuck13]

every sport all i bet is dogs and unders. very seldom see me on a favorite and an over

Why not bet a over total bets over under aren't they all to be treated in appropriate manners?

[omega]

Easy? They barely won by one run. Anyone that laid -300 on the Nats today will soon be broke.

[jjgold]

Of course it wasn't easy I think we're just playing around

Canuck owes every shark in Saskatchewan

[pilebuck13]

Of course it wasn't easy I think we're just playing around

Canuck owes every shark in Saskatchewan

Gold remember when u had that late night escape out of Vegas over a miss communication on a hockey bet? What happened to that thread?

[jjgold]

We removed it buckles

[JayDr3am]

Why not bet a over total bets over under aren't they all to be treated in appropriate manners?

just my style of capping.. and i said its seldom. very rare, but it does happen.

[vividjohn45]

I liked padres +2.5 ats but at -145 it was priced to high. Now what was the price of the nats ml? -2.5 was +115. Lol.

[vividjohn45]

Its 1:1 on wagering. This means you needs to win 53% to turn profit. Im about to drop outta sbr twitter group pool cuz they allow dumbfucks to wager like boston ml tonite at -240. Or nats strasburg -220. When they loss the group is ******. Lol. Its gauged to losers who wager -200+ on a fuggin baseball game. Im outta that shit. And i went 3-1 at even money wagers in that pool. But some nimrod bets nats -220 and knocks my wins out. Actually losing my wins.and some more juice loss. Nimrods. Done with juiced up nimrods who cant research a sharper even money play.

[jjgold]

I will tell you the big chalk rarely wins easy anymore in baseball

[Sam Odom]

Just bet SD RL +2 (-103)

SD +300

@ Heritage

made a little... could have made a lot

JJ , stop tailing Brock!!

[jjgold]

Sammy not a bad call

[ChuckyTheGoat]

No juice when u win.