[Gaze73]

I'm re-opening my http://www.sportsbookreview.com/foru...l#post25214311 because there was some confusion and disbelief from some people in how much profit was made.

So here are the rules: Starting bankroll 100 units. Bet flat 5 units on every single pick. Make money. Simple enough? Previous thread won 81.7 units with a 42-22 record, which I'm continuing here.

Now I'm gonna make it even simpler - all bets will be placed on 5Dimes, and therefore staking will be american style "To win 5 units" and "Risk 5 units" when odds are above +100.

[NavsPicks]

Try going back to school before opening up another thread. Kid doesn't understand simple math.

[Gaze73]

Try going back to school before opening up another thread. Kid doesn't understand simple math.

See people, clowns like this made me re-open the thread. He literally doesn't understand "Starting bankroll 100 units. Bet flat 5 units on every single pick" after having it explained 5 times. I thought even a kindergartner could understand such simple rules. Now he'll spam this thread too, oh dear.

[NavsPicks]

See people, clowns like this made me re-open the thread. He literally doesn't understand "Starting bankroll 100 units. Bet flat 5 units on every single pick" after having it explained 5 times. I thought even a kindergartner could understand such simple rules. Now he'll spam this thread too, oh dear.

Do you honestly believe that you're right and the 10 posters that have pointed out your flaws are wrong? Come on

[Gaze73]

Do you honestly believe that you're right and the 10 posters that have pointed out your flaws are wrong? Come on

By 10 posters you mean you and one other guy? I fukking dare you to go through every day's results and find one flaw. I guarantee you'd end up with 81.7 units, with a margin of error of 0.5 units.

[NavsPicks]

By 10 posters you mean you and one other guy? I fukking dare you to go through every day's results and find one flaw. I guarantee you'd end up with 81.7 units, with a margin of error of 0.5 units.

When you lose its -1 unit and when you win its +5 units. Doesn't take a genius to see that.

[Ballerholic]

Lol this is too funny

[Merkel]

Gaze..... Are you still letting people beat you up on these boards? You are the worst, the absolute worst gambler I've ever seen on this site....

[Gaze73]

Lol this is too funny

More like sad, I just don't know what to tell that guy to make him shut up. I went 42-22, posted results every single day, and he insists that I somehow doctored the results.

[Gaze73]

Gaze..... Are you still letting people beat you up on these boards? You are the worst, the absolute worst gambler I've ever seen on this site....

I knew you'd show up. Tell me, Mr. Greatest Capper In The World, how is going 44-22, and winning 81.7 units in 21 days considered "the absolute worst gambler I've ever seen"? What the hell are your standards? 85% hit rate at even odds?

[Merkel]

Gaze man, you have losing threads stretching back years. I told you the first time around that this isn't for you. Your parents must be desperate by now. I'm not taking the time to do the math which people are criticizing already, but even if you were up, you'll lose it all in the end, that's the pattern. Why didn't you get a career going instead of wasting your time here?

[Merkel]

So, I took time to scan your first Get Rich thread, and it's like I expected, full of holes, you're basically falsifying your "record" by omitting amounts wagered etc... I also feel dumber for having read some of the stuff in there.
You're hopeless Gaze, nobody gets rich quickly doing this, and least of all you. You're wasting your time that you should be investing in a career. This wil end like all your other threads.

[Gaze73]

Gaze man, you have losing threads stretching back years. I told you the first time around that this isn't for you. Your parents must be desperate by now. I'm not taking the time to do the math which people are criticizing already, but even if you were up, you'll lose it all in the end, that's the pattern. Why didn't you get a career going instead of wasting your time here?

Oh here we go, another smartass digging up ancient threads. Hello, it's 2016. The "people" criticizing the math is mostly one certified retard, Navspicks. And tell me, specifically, what do I have to achieve to change your mind? 500 units with a 60% hit rate will suffice? Or 1000 units with 65%? Or will you even then keep telling me how I'll eventually lose it all?

[Wangsta3]

Congrats on winning. You're doing a good job. The problem with your other thread was using 5 units for every bet. If say 1 unit is 100 and your betting 500 every time, why not just make $500 1 unit? Would make more sense and not make your units look so inflated.

[jjgold]

These never work

It seems the quickest way to go broke threads

[NavsPicks]

Congrats on winning. You're doing a good job. The problem with your other thread was using 5 units for every bet. If say 1 unit is 100 and your betting 500 every time, why not just make $500 1 unit? Would make more sense and not make your units look so inflated.

But but but that way he can't lie about his units. It'll be black and white. 65% hit rate does not get you +72 units. It's more like +13 units and it'll all come crashing down on a 0-3 night .

[Gaze73]

Congrats on winning. You're doing a good job. The problem with your other thread was using 5 units for every bet. If say 1 unit is 100 and your betting 500 every time, why not just make $500 1 unit? Would make more sense and not make your units look so inflated.

Because with a 10k roll you should bet 5% = 500 = 5 units. Is it so unheard of around here to divide a bankroll into 100 units, and bet more than 1 per pick? You can't get rich quick by making one unit bets.

[NavsPicks]

Because with a 10k roll you should bet 5% = 500 = 5 units. Is it so unheard of around here to divide a bankroll into 100 units, and bet more than 1 per pick?

You're actually an idiot. If you have a strict policy of betting 500 a game no more no less then why the penetrate not just use that as your unit? It's like someone betting 100 a game and using 20 as the unit.

[NavsPicks]

Because with a 10k roll you should bet 5% = 500 = 5 units. Is it so unheard of around here to divide a bankroll into 100 units, and bet more than 1 per pick?

Talk to me when you can throw up pictures of accepted bets rather than just empty bets.

[allabout the $$$]

nav that makes too much sense and he has none

[Gaze73]

Talk to me when you can throw up pictures of accepted bets rather than just empty bets.

Would that somehow affect my 42-22 record? You think I would waste hours every day just to air bet?

[unde0087]

20 posts deep not one play, this thread is going well

[Gaze73]

20 posts deep not one play, this thread is going well

Yeah, thank the spam clowns.

[NavsPicks]

Would that somehow affect my 42-22 record? You think I would waste hours every day just to air bet?

The players that have tracking threads like this are the brokest . They're just looking for some sort of way to gamble. Post a pic or shut up.

[badgerguy]

Tailing

[swordsandtequila]

Congrats on winning. You're doing a good job. The problem with your other thread was using 5 units for every bet. If say 1 unit is 100 and your betting 500 every time, why not just make $500 1 unit? Would make more sense and not make your units look so inflated.

You're actually an idiot. If you have a strict policy of betting 500 a game no more no less then why the penetrate not just use that as your unit? It's like someone betting 100 a game and using 20 as the unit.

Wasting your time, already been down that road. I explained this explicitly, and politely, but op is stuck on the notion that a unit always equals 1% of your bankroll. An ancient rule that somehow escaped all us old timers. Which is sad, because he's doing well.

[Gaze73]

The players that have tracking threads like this are the brokest . They're just looking for some sort of way to gamble. Post a pic or shut up.

Yeah, you'd rather follow someone with no tracking, right? And at least I have proof against assholes like yourself that I'm in profit. You would claim I'm -50 units if I didn't have that track record. If I posted a pic you'd claim it's photoshopped. Some people just can't be pleased.

[Gaze73]

Wasting your time, already been down that road. I explained this explicitly, and politely, but op is stuck on the notion that a unit always equals 1% of your bankroll. An ancient rule that somehow escaped all us old timers. Which is sad, because he's doing well.

So 100 units = 100% of bankroll is an ancient concept that escaped you, but a 20 unit bankroll makes much more sense, right?
I won 81.7 units with a 100 unit bankroll, for an 81.7% increase. You want that to be +16.34 units, with a 20 unit bankroll, which is - surprise, surprise an 81.7% increase.

[Gaze73]

Behold, the first pick!

Oklahoma City Thunder/Minnesota Timberwolves Over 210 -108

[allabout the $$$]

So 100 units = 100% of bankroll is an ancient concept that escaped you, but a 20 unit bankroll makes much more sense, right?
I won 81.7 units with a 100 unit bankroll, for an 81.7% increase. You want that to be +16.34 units, with a 20 unit bankroll, which is - surprise, surprise an 81.7% increase.

you are so lost. for the purpose of flat betting which you are doing 1 unit would be 500. not 5 units. since you never change your unit size everything is only 1 unit. but as me and merkel know as soon as you hit a bad run it will be 10, 15, and 25 units. enjoy your little run with your terrible record keeping. we all know you will be broke again in no time.

my offer still stands 1000 betpoints for 60% after 50 picks no ml over -200 all straight bets.

american odds

[jjgold]

This thread will not end up well

Only a few here can track more than 30 days and the rest quit when they are down bad

[Gaze73]

you are so lost. for the purpose of flat betting which you are doing 1 unit would be 500. not 5 units. since you never change your unit size everything is only 1 unit. but as me and merkel know as soon as you hit a bad run it will be 10, 15, and 25 units. enjoy your little run with your terrible record keeping. we all know you will be broke again in no time.

my offer still stands 1000 betpoints for 60% after 50 picks no ml over -200 all straight bets.

american odds

In other words, you like to say "I won 16.34 units, which is actually 81.7% of the bankroll" instead of "I won 81.7 units"
Ok, I accept that bet.

[Gaze73]

UC Davis -130

[toddsclowns]

Haven't posted in a while, and this seemed like a good one to post some very "fadable" picks. To be fair, I have a quite uncanny ability to pick consistent losers - from blowouts, to half-court buzzer beaters, to the occasional technical free throws w/no time left on the clock, I've consistently been on the losing end of them all. I have a couple I like tonight, so Fade away! Good luck!

P.S. I still use a physical bookie, i.e. no internet pictures of plays - but I can show a pic of a couple broken fingers...was a rough football season (lines are from vegasinsiders.com)

East Carolina +5.5
Seton Hall -16
Arkansas +3
Clemson -1.5
Butler -14

Cheers!

[Gaze73]

Last one today, unders are my favorite: Massachusetts/St. Joseph's Under 154½ -110