Fade The Stars Giveaway - 1000 points - Seaweed & Thomorino

**no1here** · 10-23-20, 05:33 PM

Mine wasn't a clear pick? I believe that it was.

Originally posted by Optional

Maybe I am missing something. I don't agree with that, but if you can convince me that fading an entire parlay at odds ~+600 is more legit than fading one of the legs at -110 I'll cough up a consolation prize.

Remembering the only real rule to start with was "it must be a clear pick".

I honestly don't think anyone else who played thought for a second that a 3 leg parlay counted as a clear pick.

**Roger T. Bannon** · 10-23-20, 05:35 PM

Originally posted by no1here

I CORRECTLY POSTED PICKS THAN YOU NEEDED BETS ONLY. WTF! I correctly posted a pick from seaweeds post. PROBLEM IS NOT WITH MY POST BUT BRANNON'S AND YOU TURN IT TO MAKE MY POST WRONG, TO WHICH IT WASN'T. There was never mention of parlays not counting after Bannons made his post. PARLAYS WERE FINE TO USED WHEN I POSTED.

There was not any problem with my post. Obviously Optional would not have counted the parlay so he counted it. What are you talking about?

**no1here** · 10-23-20, 05:36 PM

You weren't legit at all posting a bet whereas I posted a pick as required. Don't put me down as I didn't do no wrong.

Originally posted by Roger T. Bannon

LOL. Obviously taking a parlay pick is more legit than taking a leg. So if you would obviously not take it, it would obviously not count. There was no way to know what kind of contest this was. It's your contest and your points to award. Par for the course.

**no1here** · 10-23-20, 05:37 PM

If he counted the parlay than I win.

Originally posted by Roger T. Bannon

There was not any problem with my post. Obviously Optional would not have counted the parlay so he counted it. What are you talking about?

**no1here** · 10-23-20, 05:43 PM

Being Parlay has nothing to do with it, these were seaweeds picks and I wasn't stupid enough to use all 3. DID I CHEAT? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING?

Originally posted by Optional

Sorry Roger. I never would have counted someone wanting to fade a parlay where only 1 leg has to lose. I don't think that needed to be explicitly stated in the context of the offer.

No1here picked out 1 leg of a parlay to fade. That's the only reason I entertained the idea at all.

If all 3 legs of this parlay had lost I would have counted it for you, but even in that case if you guys had left the decision to me, I would have felt that we needed to pay No1here's pick as the winner if we were counting yours anyway.

Decision is Stake wins the Seaweed fade.

Get Thomorino Roger.

**Optional** · 10-23-20, 05:44 PM

No need to fight guys.

Roger does not win as I don't consider his parlay pick valid.

No1here does not win as he rescinded his pick after my post saying no more parlay legs

Originally posted by no1here

Fading bleeders tonights pick taking LA

ttps://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3627137-i-am-wearing-sunglasses-tomorrow-why-because-rays-will-hitting.html

scrap my seaweed parlay post making this my 2nd pick tied with Bannon. Chi_archie, and stil370, everybody else looking for #1

for morinos contest, stake1, headsterx, Bannon, stil370 all are at one

I'm sorry that you regret that now No1here, but I think you did the right thing. I never intended anything but clear straight picks.

**Roger T. Bannon** · 10-23-20, 05:44 PM

Originally posted by no1here

You weren't legit at all posting a bet whereas I posted a pick as required. Don't put me down as I didn't do no wrong.

I was totally legit. That is why the pick counted and I did not win.

**no1here** · 10-23-20, 05:46 PM

STAKE1 IS A TROLL AND A MISERABLE ONE AT THAT. I was handing contest down to Bannon not stake1.

**no1here** · 10-23-20, 05:47 PM

If you're parlay pick counts than mine should.

Originally posted by Roger T. Bannon

I was totally legit. That is why the pick counted and I did not win.

**Roger T. Bannon** · 10-23-20, 05:50 PM

Originally posted by no1here

If you're parlay pick counts than mine should.

Mine counts because it did not count. Your counts because it does not count. Those were the rules. We just did not know it.

**no1here** · 10-23-20, 05:51 PM

Stake1 cannot be the winner, it must be either bannon or myself

**Roger T. Bannon** · 10-23-20, 06:19 PM

He's got the points so he is the winner. He lucked his way into it just as any of us were going to have to. It was a stupid contest with a stupid result. The decision has been made.

**no1here** · 10-23-20, 09:19 PM

Opti I was being super nice allowing you a chance NOT TO USE seaweeds parlay post and in turn you screwed me. The dilemma is between bannon and myself and stake's not even involved. We both had 3 in row prior to stake even playing. Either used the parlay seaweed posted or not, but not both ways eliminating both of us.

Second time in a month or so that I am screwed in contest with creator having the need to change the rules to do so. Both contests took eons of hours only to be stuck in the butt by the mod.

BEING A BET WAS NOT A STATED REQUIREMENT AND YOU LIE WHEN YOU STATE THAT THAT'S WHAT YOU MEANT! YOU MEANT PICK AS YOU SAID REPEATEDLY IN POST 1 CONTAINING THE RULES.

**Optional** · 10-23-20, 09:33 PM

I'm sorry you feel that way No1here.

I honestly think I got this correct. But even if not, I had to make a decision and explained how I came to it.

I went by your post saying "scrap my Seaweed parlay pick".

I don't think Roger's parlay pick is relevant to the matter, or he is even involved in the discussion the way I am thinking about it.

**Roger T. Bannon** · 10-23-20, 09:50 PM

I think he has you on the parlay leg since you said to not count it after he gave it to you.

Re-reading, I guess Optional said he would have counted my parlay if it had won so I guess I have ragged on him too much here. So if that is the case that was a legit loss.

**Optional** · 10-23-20, 10:01 PM

If Roger had won all three parlay legs, I would have sent 250 each to the three of you. As I could not pay Roger without paying No1here, and I felt it would not be right to pay No1here and not Stake. But without Roger in the equation there was no justification to pay No1here. (I hope that logic train makes sense)

Sorry for any confusion/disappointment.

**Headsterx** · 10-24-20, 08:22 AM

Moron's fade #3: Indiana +6.5

Illinois at Wisconsin - Pick and Write-Up - Sportsbook Review Forum

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3627785-illinois-wisconsin-pick-write-up-p4.html#post29818563

The SBR Lobby: Sports Talk, Gambling and Bettors Chat

**GT21Megatron** · 10-24-20, 08:43 AM

Originally posted by Headsterx

Moron's fade #3: Indiana +6.5

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...l#post29818563

He’s on the right side with this one

**no1here** · 10-24-20, 01:42 PM

morino fade for indi +6.5 post 123

Illinois at Wisconsin - Pick and Write-Up - Sportsbook Review Forum

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3627785-illinois-wisconsin-pick-write-up-p4.html

The SBR Lobby: Sports Talk, Gambling and Bettors Chat

**thomorino** · 10-25-20, 12:48 AM

Originally posted by Headsterx

Moron's fade #3: Indiana +6.5

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...l#post29818563

You are a dumb shit.

**Optional** · 10-25-20, 02:23 AM

Thomorino looks like he is a bit tougher to fade than Seaweed.

**cincinnatikid513** · 10-25-20, 02:43 AM

Originally posted by no1here

Opti I was being super nice allowing you a chance NOT TO USE seaweeds parlay post and in turn you screwed me. The dilemma is between bannon and myself and stake's not even involved. We both had 3 in row prior to stake even playing. Either used the parlay seaweed posted or not, but not both ways eliminating both of us.

Second time in a month or so that I am screwed in contest with creator having the need to change the rules to do so. Both contests took eons of hours only to be stuck in the butt by the mod.

BEING A BET WAS NOT A STATED REQUIREMENT AND YOU LIE WHEN YOU STATE THAT THAT'S WHAT YOU MEANT! YOU MEANT PICK AS YOU SAID REPEATEDLY IN POST 1 CONTAINING THE RULES.

piss off scam artist milk spiller u deserve nothing

**cincinnatikid513** · 10-25-20, 02:45 AM

Originally posted by no1here

Because bannon made his mistake I lose after rules were changed and twice!

look at this pos whiner crying over betpoints

ur pathetic

**Headsterx** · 10-25-20, 11:12 AM

Moron's fade #1: Steelers

Week 7 Picks - Sportsbook Review Forum

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3627236-week-7-picks.html

The SBR Lobby: Sports Talk, Gambling and Bettors Chat

**Roger T. Bannon** · 10-25-20, 03:24 PM

Seattle fade:

Week 7 Picks - Sportsbook Review Forum

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3627236-week-7-picks-p10.html

The SBR Lobby: Sports Talk, Gambling and Bettors Chat

**thomorino** · 10-25-20, 04:30 PM

Originally posted by Headsterx

Moron's fade #1: Steelers

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...k-7-picks.html

Loser dumb shit

**stake1** · 10-25-20, 06:48 PM

Fading his Seattle -3' in post 202: https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...-picks-p6.html

Taking Arizona +3'

**Headsterx** · 10-25-20, 06:49 PM

Moron's fade #1: Seahawks

Week 7 Picks - Sportsbook Review Forum

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3627236-week-7-picks-p6.html

The SBR Lobby: Sports Talk, Gambling and Bettors Chat

Who's actually stalking?

**stake1** · 10-25-20, 07:31 PM

Originally posted by thomorino

I a big time loser. Down over 50
unit in Nfl and not even wok 8. Did you now that 5+1=8

Well said Thom

**stake1** · 10-25-20, 11:13 PM

Fading his Under for Monday night football. Post 61: https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...-picks-p2.html

Taking Over 44’ in the Bears at Rams game

**thomorino** · 10-26-20, 01:31 AM

Originally posted by Headsterx

Moron's fade #1: Seahawks

Week 7 Picks - Sportsbook Review Forum

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3627236-week-7-picks-p6.html

The SBR Lobby: Sports Talk, Gambling and Bettors Chat

Who's actually stalking?

Originally posted by stake1

Well said Thom

You are a dumb shit.

**thomorino** · 10-26-20, 01:32 AM

Originally posted by stake1

Fading his Under for Monday night football. Post 61: https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...-picks-p2.html

Taking Over 44’ in the Bears at Rams game

The under was posted at 44.5 and has been 45 for several days at most books dumb shit.

**Buckandadime** · 10-26-20, 01:42 AM

Originally posted by stake1

Fading his Under for Monday night football. Post 61: https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...-picks-p2.html

Taking Over 44’ in the Bears at Rams game

Originally posted by thomorino

The under was posted at 44.5 and has been 45 for several days at most books dumb shit.

44' is 44.5 moron!!!

**stake1** · 10-26-20, 07:16 AM

Originally posted by thomorino

The under was posted at 44.5 and has been 45 for several days at most books dumb shit.

If tonight’s game goes over 44’ total points? Then I have successfully faded you three-in-a-row. By the way, you should study yourself, and realize that 99% of the time, you get the worst of the line. I am a generous guy, would you like a few Kleenex’s to wipe your eyes?

**cincinnatikid513** · 10-26-20, 07:18 AM

who won the dumb and dumber contest