Fade The Stars Giveaway - 1000 points - Seaweed & Thomorino
Collapse
X
-
no1hereSBR Hall of Famer
- 03-23-09
- 5914
#141Comment -
Roger T. BannonSBR Hall of Famer
- 06-28-18
- 5139
#142I CORRECTLY POSTED PICKS THAN YOU NEEDED BETS ONLY. WTF! I correctly posted a pick from seaweeds post. PROBLEM IS NOT WITH MY POST BUT BRANNON'S AND YOU TURN IT TO MAKE MY POST WRONG, TO WHICH IT WASN'T. There was never mention of parlays not counting after Bannons made his post. PARLAYS WERE FINE TO USED WHEN I POSTED.Comment -
no1hereSBR Hall of Famer
- 03-23-09
- 5914
#143You weren't legit at all posting a bet whereas I posted a pick as required. Don't put me down as I didn't do no wrong.
Comment -
no1hereSBR Hall of Famer
- 03-23-09
- 5914
#145Being Parlay has nothing to do with it, these were seaweeds picks and I wasn't stupid enough to use all 3. DID I CHEAT? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING?
Sorry Roger. I never would have counted someone wanting to fade a parlay where only 1 leg has to lose. I don't think that needed to be explicitly stated in the context of the offer.
No1here picked out 1 leg of a parlay to fade. That's the only reason I entertained the idea at all.
If all 3 legs of this parlay had lost I would have counted it for you, but even in that case if you guys had left the decision to me, I would have felt that we needed to pay No1here's pick as the winner if we were counting yours anyway.
Decision is Stake wins the Seaweed fade.
Get Thomorino Roger.Comment -
OptionalAdministrator
- 06-10-10
- 60849
#146No need to fight guys.
Roger does not win as I don't consider his parlay pick valid.
No1here does not win as he rescinded his pick after my post saying no more parlay legs
Fading bleeders tonights pick taking LA
ttps://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3627137-i-am-wearing-sunglasses-tomorrow-why-because-rays-will-hitting.html
scrap my seaweed parlay post making this my 2nd pick tied with Bannon. Chi_archie, and stil370, everybody else looking for #1
for morinos contest, stake1, headsterx, Bannon, stil370 all are at one.Comment -
no1hereSBR Hall of Famer
- 03-23-09
- 5914
#148STAKE1 IS A TROLL AND A MISERABLE ONE AT THAT. I was handing contest down to Bannon not stake1.Comment -
no1hereSBR Hall of Famer
- 03-23-09
- 5914
#151Stake1 cannot be the winner, it must be either bannon or myselfComment -
Roger T. BannonSBR Hall of Famer
- 06-28-18
- 5139
#152He's got the points so he is the winner. He lucked his way into it just as any of us were going to have to. It was a stupid contest with a stupid result. The decision has been made.Comment -
no1hereSBR Hall of Famer
- 03-23-09
- 5914
#153Opti I was being super nice allowing you a chance NOT TO USE seaweeds parlay post and in turn you screwed me. The dilemma is between bannon and myself and stake's not even involved. We both had 3 in row prior to stake even playing. Either used the parlay seaweed posted or not, but not both ways eliminating both of us.
Second time in a month or so that I am screwed in contest with creator having the need to change the rules to do so. Both contests took eons of hours only to be stuck in the butt by the mod.
BEING A BET WAS NOT A STATED REQUIREMENT AND YOU LIE WHEN YOU STATE THAT THAT'S WHAT YOU MEANT! YOU MEANT PICK AS YOU SAID REPEATEDLY IN POST 1 CONTAINING THE RULES.Comment -
OptionalAdministrator
- 06-10-10
- 60849
#154I'm sorry you feel that way No1here.
I honestly think I got this correct. But even if not, I had to make a decision and explained how I came to it.
I went by your post saying "scrap my Seaweed parlay pick".
I don't think Roger's parlay pick is relevant to the matter, or he is even involved in the discussion the way I am thinking about it..Comment -
Roger T. BannonSBR Hall of Famer
- 06-28-18
- 5139
#155I think he has you on the parlay leg since you said to not count it after he gave it to you.
Re-reading, I guess Optional said he would have counted my parlay if it had won so I guess I have ragged on him too much here. So if that is the case that was a legit loss.Comment -
OptionalAdministrator
- 06-10-10
- 60849
#156If Roger had won all three parlay legs, I would have sent 250 each to the three of you. As I could not pay Roger without paying No1here, and I felt it would not be right to pay No1here and not Stake. But without Roger in the equation there was no justification to pay No1here. (I hope that logic train makes sense)
Sorry for any confusion/disappointment..Comment -
GT21MegatronSBR Posting Legend
- 12-20-13
- 10818
#158Comment -
no1hereSBR Hall of Famer
- 03-23-09
- 5914
#159morino fade for indi +6.5 post 123
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3627785-illinois-wisconsin-pick-write-up-p4.htmlThe SBR Lobby: Sports Talk, Gambling and Bettors ChatComment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#160Comment -
OptionalAdministrator
- 06-10-10
- 60849
#161Thomorino looks like he is a bit tougher to fade than Seaweed..Comment -
cincinnatikid513SBR Aristocracy
- 11-23-17
- 45360
#162Opti I was being super nice allowing you a chance NOT TO USE seaweeds parlay post and in turn you screwed me. The dilemma is between bannon and myself and stake's not even involved. We both had 3 in row prior to stake even playing. Either used the parlay seaweed posted or not, but not both ways eliminating both of us.
Second time in a month or so that I am screwed in contest with creator having the need to change the rules to do so. Both contests took eons of hours only to be stuck in the butt by the mod.
BEING A BET WAS NOT A STATED REQUIREMENT AND YOU LIE WHEN YOU STATE THAT THAT'S WHAT YOU MEANT! YOU MEANT PICK AS YOU SAID REPEATEDLY IN POST 1 CONTAINING THE RULES.Comment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#166Comment -
stake1SBR Posting Legend
- 12-19-18
- 18116
#167Fading his Seattle -3' in post 202: https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...-picks-p6.html
Taking Arizona +3'Comment -
stake1SBR Posting Legend
- 12-19-18
- 18116
#170Fading his Under for Monday night football. Post 61: https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...-picks-p2.html
Taking Over 44’ in the Bears at Rams gameComment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#172Fading his Under for Monday night football. Post 61: https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...-picks-p2.html
Taking Over 44’ in the Bears at Rams gameComment -
BuckandadimeSBR Hall of Famer
- 04-21-15
- 8847
#173Fading his Under for Monday night football. Post 61: https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...-picks-p2.html
Taking Over 44’ in the Bears at Rams gameComment -
stake1SBR Posting Legend
- 12-19-18
- 18116
#174If tonight’s game goes over 44’ total points? Then I have successfully faded you three-in-a-row. By the way, you should study yourself, and realize that 99% of the time, you get the worst of the line. I am a generous guy, would you like a few Kleenex’s to wipe your eyes?Comment -
cincinnatikid513SBR Aristocracy
- 11-23-17
- 45360
#175who won the dumb and dumber contestComment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code