Hawks Suck against the spread...but I'm taking all the value I can get by taking the UNDER...for the 1st half and the Full Game....SU the Hawks are also a good value....stay away from the -6.5 ATL....perhaps consider taking BOSTON at +6.5?
ATL Hawks.....are TERRIBLE..ATS..staying away from -6.5
Collapse
X
-
cutter341975SBR MVP
- 09-09-13
- 2306
#1ATL Hawks.....are TERRIBLE..ATS..staying away from -6.5Tags: None -
wantitall4moiSBR MVP
- 04-17-10
- 3063
#2I dont post here much anymore but wanted to say youre completely wrong.
Hawks are 46-35-2 ATS this year and 23-12-1 ATS as a 5 or more point favorite.
That being said I thought Boston would be the east finals representative in the finals.
But still doesnt discount that what you said is laughably incorrect.Comment -
louielouieSBR MVP
- 06-06-13
- 3149
#3They were also 20 units profit ATS last year overwhelmingly the best team ATS in the league, and the best team ATS during a season for the past 10 seasons tracked -- so basically the opposite of what you just barfed onto the forumComment -
cutter341975SBR MVP
- 09-09-13
- 2306
#4I dont post here much anymore but wanted to say youre completely wrong.
Hawks are 46-35-2 ATS this year and 23-12-1 ATS as a 5 or more point favorite.
That being said I thought Boston would be the east finals representative in the finals.ONLINE
04/19/2016
12:31 AM[Ticket #: 256790280] PARLAY (8 TEAMS) 04/19/2016 @ 06:15 PM NBA [524] ATL HAWKS -6.5 -110 04/19/2016 @ 08:35 PM NBA [526] SA SPURS -18.5 -105 04/20/2016 @ 06:05 PM NBA [528] MIA HEAT -5-105 04/20/2016 @ 07:05 PM NBA [530] CLE CAVALIERS -10.5 -105 04/20/2016 @ 09:35 PM NBA [532] LA CLIPPERS -8.5 -110 04/21/2016 @ 06:05 PM NBA [533] OKC THUNDER -8-105 04/21/2016 @ 06:35 PM NBA [535] TOR RAPTORS -1-110 04/21/2016 @ 06:35 PM NBA [535] TOTAL o193-110
(TOR RAPTORS vrs IND PACERS)3.43 658.57 ONLINE
04/19/2016
05:00 PM[Ticket #: 256871943] STRAIGHT BET 04/19/2016 @ 06:15 PM NBA [1524] 1H ATL HAWKS -3.5 -115 7.30 6.35 ONLINE
04/19/2016
05:01 PM[Ticket #: 256872057] STRAIGHT BET 04/19/2016 @ 06:05 PM NBA [3524] 1Q ATL HAWKS -2-120 7.62 6.35 ONLINE
04/19/2016
05:01 PM[Ticket #: 256872183] STRAIGHT BET 04/19/2016 @ 06:05 PM NBA [4524] 2Q ATL HAWKS -1.5 -110 6.99 6.35 ONLINE
04/19/2016
05:03 PM[Ticket #: 256872537] STRAIGHT BET 04/19/2016 @ 06:15 PM NBA [524] TOTAL u206-110
(BOS CELTICS vrs ATL HAWKS)8.90 8.09 ONLINE
04/19/2016
05:06 PM[Ticket #: 256873284] STRAIGHT BET 04/19/2016 @ 06:15 PM NBA [1524] TOTAL u99-105
(1H BOS CELTICS vrs 1H ATL HAWKS)6.85 6.52 ONLINE
04/19/2016
05:08 PM[Ticket #: 256873596] STRAIGHT BET 04/19/2016 @ 06:05 PM NBA [6524] 4Q ATL HAWKS -1-115 7.30 6.35 ONLINE
04/19/2016
05:09 PMok.. [Ticket #: 256873772] STRAIGHT BET 04/19/2016 @ 06:15 PM NBA [524] TOTAL u206.5 -110
(BOS CELTICS vrs ATL HAWKS)4.95 4.50
But still doesnt discount that what you said is laughably incorrect.Comment -
cutter341975SBR MVP
- 09-09-13
- 2306
#5I dont post here much anymore but wanted to say youre completely wrong.
Hawks are 46-35-2 ATS this year and 23-12-1 ATS as a 5 or more point favorite.
ok....
That being said I thought Boston would be the east finals representative in the finals.
here you go....But still doesnt discount that what you said is laughably incorrect.Atlanta Hawks 48-34-0 27-14-0 21-20-0 41-39-2 21-19-1 20-20-1 38-43-1 19-22-0 19-21-1 Comment -
Ghenghis KahnSBR Posting Legend
- 01-02-12
- 19734
#7is that the right score? boston scored 3 points in 6 minutes? that has to be some type of playoffs record. that's hard to do...Comment -
NardVaSBR Hall of Famer
- 10-02-07
- 8325
#9Celtics are done. Hawks up by 20. This time there is no come back. Hawks are gone sweep Boston. Brad Stevens is in over his head. Back to back 0-4 playoff exits.Comment -
NardVaSBR Hall of Famer
- 10-02-07
- 8325
-
louielouieSBR MVP
- 06-06-13
- 3149
#12Is this a mikefan style reverse jinx thread?Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94379
#13
They lost bradley. Btw boston is a shit team only looking good cause of Stevens coaching. Very few nba coaches would have gotten this squad into the playoffs.Comment -
jtolerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-17-13
- 30967
#14Obviously dont know what youre talking about just spouting off, you couldnt be more wrong about their ats.Comment -
cutter341975SBR MVP
- 09-09-13
- 2306
#15Comment -
Booya711BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-20-11
- 27329
#16so many fades hereComment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82840
#18How does Paul Millsap's schlong feel deep in OP's ass?Comment -
cutter341975SBR MVP
- 09-09-13
- 2306
#20I dont post here much anymore but wanted to say youre completely wrong.
Hawks are 46-35-2 ATS this year and 23-12-1 ATS as a 5 or more point favorite.
That being said I thought Boston would be the east finals representative in the finals.
But still doesnt discount that what you said is laughably incorrect.Comment -
wantitall4moiSBR MVP
- 04-17-10
- 3063
#21You might want to find a better database, that one is crap even the worst one on the net is better than that one
49-34 (3.58, 59.0%) 42-39-2 (0.04, 51.9%) avg line: -3.5
26-10 (8.97, 72.2%) 21-14-1 (0.75, 60.0%) avg line: -8.2
22-8 (7.60, 73.3%) 17-12-1 (-0.52, 58.6%) avg line: -8.1 Comment -
cutter341975SBR MVP
- 09-09-13
- 2306
#22You might want to find a better database, that one is crap even the worst one on the net is better than that one
http://killersports.com/nba/query_matrixNBA Against the Spread Rankings at VegasInsider.com ...
<cite class="_Rm" style="color: rgb(0, 102, 33); font-style: normal; font-size: 14px;">www.vegasinsider.com/nba/against-the-spread/</cite>
NBA Against the Spread Rankings provided by VegasInsider.com, along with ...Atlanta Hawks, 48-34-0, 27-14-0, 21-20-0, 41-39-2, 21-19-1, 20-20-1, 38-43-1 ......thats where I got it from..if its wrong..its wrong
49-34 (3.58, 59.0%) 42-39-2 (0.04, 51.9%) avg line: -3.5
26-10 (8.97, 72.2%) 21-14-1 (0.75, 60.0%) avg line: -8.2
22-8 (7.60, 73.3%) 17-12-1 (-0.52, 58.6%) avg line: -8.1 Comment -
jtolerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-17-13
- 30967
#24My bad, I eat crow on this one, you are right. I was going by what guy had posted saying their ats was 46-35 when thats more like their SU record. My bad for this one, although I wouldnt call that horrible still, that means the book has them about pegged right, most teams ats are around .500, the horrible teams are usually the big public teams everyone like to bet on that are overpriced.Comment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388179
#25Comment -
cutter341975SBR MVP
- 09-09-13
- 2306
#26My bad, I eat crow on this one, you are right. I was going by what guy had posted saying their ats was 46-35 when thats more like their SU record. My bad for this one, although I wouldnt call that horrible still, that means the book has them about pegged right, most teams ats are around .500, the horrible teams are usually the big public teams everyone like to bet on that are overpriced.Comment -
wantitall4moiSBR MVP
- 04-17-10
- 3063
#27You need about 5 databases to have a 'fair' estimate then you have to hand check any that are 2pt or less ATS losseswins to see how the lines moved. Obviously the numbers I posted in my first response were against best available, against worst available they lose 3 or 4 games overall (from my numbers) and 2 as a 5 pt or more fav.
They are a hot action team, generally dont see that much difference from best to worst for a single team. A couple others are habitually 'bad' and Atl is one of them. Makes for some OK middle shots (but so many chances it is almost not worth it.
But even so 1 or 2 games over .500 still doesnt make them 'terrible' and in the subset of a 5 or more pt favorite you cant make them a loser ATS even with the worst possible number.
Lakers are a terrible ATS team (but they have been for 15 years), Bulls, 76ers OKC and Cle would be borderline terible.Comment -
cutter341975SBR MVP
- 09-09-13
- 2306
#28My bad, I eat crow on this one, you are right. I was going by what guy had posted saying their ats was 46-35 when thats more like their SU record. My bad for this one, although I wouldnt call that horrible still, that means the book has them about pegged right, most teams ats are around .500, the horrible teams are usually the big public teams everyone like to bet on that are overpriced.
BTW...best of luck to ya'..on your bets.....I'm running 3/4 on the ATL game right now...got the UNDER..the 1st quarter...and the -3.5 half....(lost the 2nd quarter)Comment -
jtolerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-17-13
- 30967
#29Good luck Cutter, hope that parlay cashes for ya, I try to do that type thing daily myself with a couple 5 dollar bets.Comment -
cutter341975SBR MVP
- 09-09-13
- 2306
#30You need about 5 databases to have a 'fair' estimate then you have to hand check any that are 2pt or less ATS losses to see how the lines moved. Obviously the numbers I posted in my first response were against best available, against worst available they lose 3 or 4 games overall (from my numbers) and 2 as a 5 pt or more fav.
They are a hot action team, generally dont see that much difference from best to worst for a single team. A couple others are habitually 'bad' and Atl is one of them. Makes for some OK middle shots (but so many chances it is almost not worth it.
But even so 1 or 2 games over .500 still doesnt make them 'terrible' and in the subset of a 5 or more pt favorite you cant make them a loser ATS even with the worst possible number.Comment -
cutter341975SBR MVP
- 09-09-13
- 2306
-
Ballin24SBR Wise Guy
- 03-06-14
- 715
#32hawks will choke they are chokers and have been doing so all year as you saw in game 1.
Celtics +1100 ML Live is what I hit along with spread of +14.5.
They will come back OPComment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code