US online gambling conference now history

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • natty
    SBR Rookie
    • 10-24-05
    • 34

    #1
    US online gambling conference now history
    Here's the link to ABC news but I cut/pasted it here for u to read.



    July 20 Has online gambling crapped out?

    David Carruthers became the latest poster boy – or scapegoat, depending on one's perspective — when he was arrested in Dallas on charges of racketeering, conspiracy and an illegal online gambling enterprise. While on a layover to Costa Rica, where his company is based, Carruthers, chief executive officer for BetOnSports was arrested and detained on Sunday, forcing the online gambling community to take note.

    Carruthers' arrest seems to have spooked online gaming executives. A major gaming conference, scheduled for next week in Las Vegas, has been cancelled. The Bodog.com Marketing Conference typically attracts gaming professionals from all over the world but as soon as word of Carruthers arrest spread, attendees began canceling.

    "No senior executive from a gaming company was going to come after [the arrest] happened," said Calvin Ayre, founder and chief executive officer for Bodog.com.

    "Nobody in the industry right now wants to come into the United States," Ayre said. "We're talking business people here. The people who run the online gaming industry are business people. They're not criminals. Nobody wants to be the test case for a prosecutor trying to make a name for themselves."

    The conference will likely be held in the UK, Canada, the Bahamas, or Costa Rica in the next few months. Ayre said that this was likely the last year that it would have been held in the U.S. anyway because America is so unfriendly to the gaming industry.

    But BetOnSports is not a typical online gaming company. They deal in sports betting, which is clearly outlawed by the Federal Wire Act of 1961, and they once operated in the United States. Most Bodog attendees are in the card gaming business and operate overseas, which makes them a bit more untouchable by the U.S. government. But they're not willing to gamble with the prospect of prosecution.

    "From my read of the indictment, it sounds like this is an isolated situation," said Bruce Sabot, director of sales for Casino City, an online gambling information Web site, of the arrest. "It deals specifically with past history of the founders. The indictment talks about past practices that date back to 1992 of their illegal gambling activities that started in New York, moved to Florida and then offshore."

    Several others involved with BetOnSports are also being prosecuted, including family members of Gary Kaplan, the company's founder. Representatives from the company could not be reached for comment and the Web site has since been shut down, with a notice explaining the situation.

    "In light of court papers filed in the United States, the company has temporarily suspended this facility pending its ability to assess its full position," the notice reads. "During this period no financial or wagering transactions can be executed. Further information will be posted once the company is in a position to do so."

    The indictment was made by Catherine L. Hanaway, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri.

    Continued…




    "I think it's a strong message from the prosecutors that they're not going to sit on the sidelines and watch the online gaming industry continue to ignore the illegality of online gaming in the U.S.," said Paul Slocomb West, an attorney specializing in online gaming with McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC. "In my opinion, it will send a chilling message to not just the sites but people who process the payments as well."

    The payment process came under attack last week with the bill passed by the House of Representatives, 317-93, which blocks the use of credit cards and bank accounts for online wagering. While this would make online gaming inconvenient, it is not likely to stop it. Like any illicit activity, where there is a will, there is a way.

    "If the goal is to make it impossible for people to gamble, it's not very effective because there will undoubtedly be existing ways [to gamble],"said David C. Croson, an associate professor of strategy and entrepreneurship for the Edwin L. Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist University. "Some clever entrepreneurs will think of new ways, and they're probably working on it right now."

    Croson is of the opinion that the U.S. is missing the boat by trying to prohibit online gambling altogether. Right or wrong, online gambling as it stands now does the U.S. economy no favors.

    "It seems that U.S. betters as a whole lose about $4 billion each year just due to online sports betting," Croson said. "I noticed that the per capita gross domestic product of the U.S. is in the neighborhood of $40,000 per person, so that says that the economic impact of losing $4 billion is the equivalent of losing 100,000 jobs. This is kind of like taking 100,000 jobs and shipping them out of the US in briefcases."

    But wouldn't that $4 billion be lost either way on some other vice? Croson admits that it might. He's not worried about how the money is spent, but where it was spent, he said.

    "It may very well have been spent on other vices but it was spent on vices in the U.S." Croson said. "It was spent on U.S. vices like alcohol and cigarettes. I'm just thinking about it at the country level."

    Croson estimates that those that are actually making money online will be hurt by the 317-93 bill but he points out that most online gamblers are not making money. Those that are winning seem adept at beating the system and those that are losing are, for lack of a better term, losers.

    "In the professional gambling circuits, people who win have to be highly intelligent and capable and they have to be sophisticated in probability and finance and could probably make a good living on Wall Street," Croson said. "The people who are losing are not the sharpest tools in the shed."

    Croson believes that the U.S. should stop trying to beat 'em and just join 'em. If the U.S. regulated online gaming, the economy could benefit from the taxation of the pastime, as well as regulate the fraud that may contribute to the lost $4 million.

    "If I win, how do I know I'm going to get paid?" said Greg Giordano, a partner with Snell and Wilmer in Las Vegas. "How do I know it is fair? How do I know what the payback percentage is? How do I know the program isn't written so that it is not possible to get dealt a full house? How do I know these things unless it's regulated by somebody who has looked at the software?"

    Giordano doesn't think that the 317-93 bill will pass in time to put a dent in the online gambling economy. Meanwhile, the U.S. can kiss more money goodbye from conference dollars that will not be spent by the online gaming community.

    "We're going to move [the Bodog.com Conference] to an overseas city that is more hospitable," Ayre said.
  • SquareShooter
    SBR High Roller
    • 04-16-06
    • 223

    #2
    Its all over.
    Online books will never be the same without Joe Sixpack.


    Damn, that was quick!
    Comment
    • Dark Horse
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 12-14-05
      • 13764

      #3
      Did you even read the article, squaresquaw?

      "It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat." - Theodore Roosevelt
      Comment
      • SquareShooter
        SBR High Roller
        • 04-16-06
        • 223

        #4
        I did.
        And you sound a bit desperate lately.

        Just admit it. Its all over. Maybe they can't eliminate online gambling overnight but now that they have taken it seriously its only a matter of time. 2 months, 6 months or 18 months, whats the difference. Its all over.
        Comment
        • Dark Horse
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 12-14-05
          • 13764

          #5
          Originally posted by SquareShooter
          I did.
          And you sound a bit desperate lately.

          Just admit it. Its all over. Maybe they can't eliminate online gambling overnight but now that they have taken it seriously its only a matter of time. 2 months, 6 months or 18 months, whats the difference. Its all over.

          Serioualy, dude, only a coward could confuse determination to fight with desperation.

          Here you have a great opportunity to make a statement, and you just roll over. I just don't get it, and I hope I never will.
          Comment
          • SquareShooter
            SBR High Roller
            • 04-16-06
            • 223

            #6
            Maybe I am a coward, but how are you going to fight? What are you going to do? Post angry posts on SBR and argue with your credit card and neteller CS?
            If the govt has decided that gambling is anti-social and needs to be shut down and majority supports it, it will be shutdown and those who will not obey will be prosecuted like criminals.

            The last online bet placed by american might happen as soon as this year...
            Comment
            • Dark Horse
              SBR Posting Legend
              • 12-14-05
              • 13764

              #7
              Why all the excuses?

              The only question that matters is: are YOU going to stand up for your godgiven right to gamble or not?

              If so, start by contacting your senator(s).
              Comment
              • SquareShooter
                SBR High Roller
                • 04-16-06
                • 223

                #8
                Have you already contacted yours?

                Thing is - gamblers don't care. Even now on verge of their whole business being taken away they care more about is it safe to bet with Actionbets or ridiculous slow-pay case by Befair.
                If one day they find their accoutns are closed, CC and Neteller denied, they'll just cease betting obeying implicitly.
                Comment
                • Dark Horse
                  SBR Posting Legend
                  • 12-14-05
                  • 13764

                  #9
                  Of course I have. More in the pipeline.

                  Gamblers don't care? lol Have you checked around the forums lately? Seldom seen so much concern about anything.
                  Think about what can happen when all that energy is focused positively, instead of scattered into a thousand different directions.

                  Bottomline. Our politicians are cowards. You know what you do with cowards? You put pressure on them and, more likely than not, they roll over.

                  Wouldn't you feel a lot better about yourself if you had helped to defeat an utterly hypocritical initiative (horse racing is exempt - lol), than if you had just given up without even trying? The numbers are on our side. If every US gambler who bets into the $6 billion a year contacts his or her representative, this legislation is off the table.

                  No better remedy against intimidation than education.
                  Comment
                  • SquareShooter
                    SBR High Roller
                    • 04-16-06
                    • 223

                    #10
                    I'd be glad if they did contact.
                    But they didn't and will never do. Their wives and mothers on the other hand might.
                    Politicians actually earn points by turning against the online gambling because majority of their votes think that online gambling is anti-social (without even knowing what an online gambling is). The word gambling itself sounds negative.

                    I'd be so happy if politicians failed this time, but they won't. This time they're going seriously after offshore businesses and they'll get them like it or not.
                    Comment
                    • QuickLearner
                      SBR High Roller
                      • 03-06-06
                      • 108

                      #11
                      Squareshooter, you seem like a pretty level-heared guy. I want you to consider not posting any more "It's over" messages because they only help to paralyze the people who are reading them while they consider whether to get involved in the fight.

                      It's not over yet. But if everybody just gives up, then yes, it might as well be over. You probably don't intend that your messages inhibit others who may decide to fight on...but I think it has that effect.

                      Instead of "Face it. It's over." how about, "It looks bleak; is there anything I can do?" I give much credit to Dark Horse for putting ideas on the table. We all should be brainstorming and developing a plan of action before it's too late.
                      Comment
                      • SquareShooter
                        SBR High Roller
                        • 04-16-06
                        • 223

                        #12
                        I understand you Quicklearner and there will be no more "its over messages" from me.

                        Its up to industry and sportsbetting market leaders to sabotage this ban! They operate billions and i hope they have made necessary investments to have lobbies in place.

                        I wish politicians failed as much as anyone!!!
                        Comment
                        • JoshW
                          SBR MVP
                          • 08-10-05
                          • 3431

                          #13
                          Online betting operators flee FBI dragnet
                          · Las Vegas gathering of top executives is scrapped
                          · Gambling sites insist US law is on their side

                          Andrew Clark in New York and Simon Bowers
                          Friday July 21, 2006

                          Guardian

                          An international conference of online gambling operators at a top Las Vegas hotel has been hurriedly cancelled amid fears that the FBI could be about to widen its crackdown on the US industry, estimated to be worth more than £3bn.
                          Meanwhile, there is growing frustration among online gambling operators listed on the London stock market about what one senior industry source said was the "loose language" emanating from the US department of justice concerning the legality of poker and casino websites taking bets from American punters. Online gaming firms that do not take sports bets insist their operations are legitimate.

                          Nevertheless, following the arrest of David Carruthers, the British chief executive of BetonSports, at Dallas airport on Sunday night, shares in online betting groups with exposure to the US have dived. Executives are understood to be seeking legal advice about whether they should avoid trips to the US.

                          Guests at an annual online gaming conference in Las Vegas next week were due to include a "who's who" of online betting, including senior executives from SportsDirect, OffshoreBettor, Casino City, GamesandCasino, Smart Interactive and PokerAffiliateWorld plus a London-based managing director of the City bank Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, Chris Treneman.

                          The basketball star Magic Johnson had been booked as a keynote speaker.

                          The organiser, Calvin Ayre, released a brief statement yesterday saying the event had been postponed because of "a high level of concern over the uncertainty surrounding the US government's recent actions against one of the companies in our industry".

                          Mr Ayre, a Canadian citizen whose internet betting firm Bodog.com is based in Costa Rica, said many of his peers feared entering America. "This will cause all executives of any substance trading in our space to change their travel plans until some certainty comes into play," he said. "I would be surprised if there's any executive who isn't sitting down with their lawyers trying to work out the implications."

                          Although Republicans on Capitol Hill have expressed anger for some time at the way offshore internet sites get round America's tight gambling restrictions, few anticipated the justice department's sudden action this week.

                          Mr Carruthers, who was arrested while changing planes en route to Costa Rica, will argue for bail at a court appearance today. At least four other people have been arrested on charges of wire fraud and aiding illegal gaming, while a warrant is out for BetonSports' founder, Gary Kaplan.

                          Many other London-listed online gambling operators believe US case law has established that all non-sports internet wagering is legitimate. The justice department vehemently disagrees, insisting all forms of online gambling are illegal under the wire act.

                          The Guardian contacted five leading UK-based internet gambling firms, all of which take bets from the US on casino or poker websites. Only one, William Hill, would comment on the record.

                          Chief executive David Harding said: "We are doing nothing illegal ... It [the indictment against BetonSports and others] doesn't worry me at all ... If it gets the Wire Act into court and there is any evidence that casino or poker bets [over the internet] are illegal, then we will stop it."

                          William Hill stopped taking sports bets from the US ahead of its flotation four years ago. It continues to take casino and poker bets , but these account for less than 1% of its online revenues. Mr Harding said William Hill did not do any heavy marketing in the US.

                          Another senior executive at a non-sports online gaming group said it "didn't come as a surprise" that the FBI was pursuing Mr Kaplan, given his involvement with sports betting in the US and his brushes with prosecutors in New York in 1993. "This has got diddly squat to do with us. We do not operate a sports book."

                          Comment
                          • SquareShooter
                            SBR High Roller
                            • 04-16-06
                            • 223

                            #14
                            Another issue!
                            Why is sportsbetting illegal, while poker and casino are legal?
                            Its easier to fraud/cheat an outcome of Roulette roll or Poker/Blackjack hand than it is to cheat your customer in sportsbetting! More to add - good sportsbetting needs knowledge and skill while casino is pure, uncontrollable gambling!
                            Comment
                            SBR Contests
                            Collapse
                            Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                            Collapse
                            Working...