a SAFETY for the cover LOL
Collapse
X
-
Duff85SBR MVP
- 06-15-10
- 2920
#106Comment -
DwightShruteSBR Aristocracy
- 01-17-09
- 103527
#110Brock Landers rocks, he puts it out there and takes the good and bad. Deserves respect. Always entertainingComment -
DrStaleSBR Hall of Famer
- 12-07-08
- 9692
#113Originally posted by Dark HorseIf with religion you mean belief system, your belief system is your religion. Again, it matters not what it is. You believe in it, you are loyal to it, would defend it, and yet have no proof of it, other than that, at one point or another, you chose to believe in it. Self-hypnosis. What if there were a snapping of fingers that broke the hypnosis?Comment -
iceminers26SBR Posting Legend
- 10-13-08
- 15600
#114Made the right call to win the game, its not like he has Phillip Rivers taking the snap.Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11152
#115correct call.Comment -
sneakerheadSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-14-10
- 7727
#118Brock mushed the safety too, unreal brockComment -
tto827SBR Hall of Famer
- 10-01-12
- 9078
#119Janikowski (I believe) onside kicked one by laying the ball on the ground earlier this year, no tee, on a regular kickoff. We've all seen crazy endings happen, Detroit scored two touchdowns in 47 seconds or something earlier this year also. Even though Schiano claims it, I still have yet to see a team lost when attempting a kneel down.Comment -
MonteSBR MVP
- 08-21-10
- 2056
#120Makes you wonder if they know about spreads, and want to cover for their fans who might bet on them.
I would feel like a traitor, correct call my Ass. Shows the fans mean nothing to them.
And no i don't bet the fukkin NFL so i could care less, just sayin'Comment -
shaunoverySBR Posting Legend
- 11-15-07
- 18143
#123Thought the golden rule was never decline a penalty to take the points off the boardComment -
Living The DreamSBR MVP
- 12-23-09
- 4521
#124I can see the call either way. Harbaugh was in complete control, what a happy day!!!
Imagine if you bet on your own team -7.5 or gave 7.5 and you had complete control at the end to win by your choice either way...
We all wish we could have such a choice!!!Comment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#126Brock the safety was declinedComment -
jameski999SBR MVP
- 10-17-11
- 1540
#129Bet the under go to sleep early!Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#130im just reading everything as didnt see gm but from my understanding taking the safety would have lead to more plays having to be ran while declining the safety essentially ended the gm,,,no reason to take points if you ahead and the gm over...Comment -
WHATaTEASESBR High Roller
- 02-07-11
- 157
#131The only logical reason he declined is to avoid injuries, which is smart. but no one on this board is convincing me he did it to seal the win. SF would have been up 9 points. Seattle would have had to recover and onside kick, score, recover another onside kick, and score again. All with no time outs, in san francisco, with 55 seconds left. So all this probability of losing the game BS is non sense, he did it to prevent injuries.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#132The only logical reason he declined is to avoid injuries, which is smart. but no one on this board is convincing me he did it to seal the win. SF would have been up 9 points. Seattle would have had to recover and onside kick, score, recover another onside kick, and score again. All with no time outs, in san francisco, with 55 seconds left. So all this probability of losing the game BS is non sense, he did it to prevent injuries.
absolutely,,,win was sealed either way but why risk a free kick where all hell gonna break loose, nothing good could have happened for sf in that spot, best case is the same thing that happened by refusing the safety, would have been careless to subject his players to that play..Comment -
Sam OdomSBR Aristocracy
- 10-30-05
- 58063
#133why did Brock post this lieComment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#134Comment -
JayLASBR Hall of Famer
- 09-11-12
- 7806
#135The only logical reason he declined is to avoid injuries, which is smart. but no one on this board is convincing me he did it to seal the win. SF would have been up 9 points. Seattle would have had to recover and onside kick, score, recover another onside kick, and score again. All with no time outs, in san francisco, with 55 seconds left. So all this probability of losing the game BS is non sense, he did it to prevent injuries.Comment -
Living The DreamSBR MVP
- 12-23-09
- 4521
#136Agreed.... Shady as it looks it was the proper callComment -
WHATaTEASESBR High Roller
- 02-07-11
- 157
#138No one is saying that's what he should of done. I'm talking about the morons that come in and post that he declined to "seal the win" and "reduce the probability of losing the game". No doubt in my mind it was to prevent the chance of injuries.Comment -
heywallySBR High Roller
- 09-09-12
- 140
#139I had $2 on the Seattle teaser .... no matter Harbaugh's decision, that was a freak safety and based on the tone of the game, you were pretty much on the right side of the bet with Seattle +points. But, for future reference, Pete Carroll does not have much of a receiving corp or passing game and I don't think that Lynch will make it through the season in one piece.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code