a SAFETY for the cover LOL

k13 · 10-18-12, 10:34 PM

Originally posted by crustyme

brock mushed the safety.

Brock had the ML...

Brock Landers · 10-18-12, 10:34 PM

Originally posted by Br0nxer

belicheck took a kneel down in the end zone years ago in a MNF game against the broncos

Pats were down 4 i believe at there own 1 yd line late in 4th quarter with all there timeouts left

he didnt want to punt. figured he would have a better chance with the free kick pinning them deeper.

Pats ended up winning the game. fukkin genius. pinned them with the free kick and got the ball back

anyone remember that game

yep, had NE in that game too...totally different scenario though, a lot of time left there.

jrmartin.mig · 10-18-12, 10:34 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

No way. He barely reached the 21 and the marker was beyond that.

The tip of the football is at the far edge if the paint on the 21 yard gashmark in the replay. Far more than he needed. That was a bad spot plain and simple.

Dancemanmarc2 · 10-18-12, 10:34 PM

Originally posted by DwightShrute

[303] SEATTLE +7½-110

IF those are locks you live dangerously

Brock Landers · 10-18-12, 10:34 PM

Originally posted by Smoke

Brock is broke

SportsPedagogy · 10-18-12, 10:35 PM

Has there ever been an onside safety punt ? It would have to hit the ground to prevent them from calling for a fair catch ... seems hard to set up

tatddy · 10-18-12, 10:35 PM

You idiots would have been lucky to cover the spread anyway. So stop bitching about your bad beat. Good stuff, Harbaugh.

Chong Wizard · 10-18-12, 10:36 PM

So fuckin crooked! If they take the safety it puts them up by 9 points... even if Seattle gets the onside kick.. most they can do is score a TD and go for two and by some sort of miracle score 8 points... SF would still be up by one... that was silly crooked!

Br0nxer · 10-18-12, 10:36 PM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

yep, had NE in that game too...totally different scenario though, a lot of time left there.

yes totally different scenario

the safety jogged my memory of that game

wasnt a lot of time in that game

maybe 4 minutes

DrStale · 10-18-12, 10:36 PM

Originally posted by jrmartin.mig

The tip of the football is at the far edge if the paint on the 21 yard gashmark in the replay. Far more than he needed. That was a bad spot plain and simple.

Yeah but the 21 yard line wasn't where he needed to get to, it was like the 21 and a half.

The Giant · 10-18-12, 10:36 PM

Originally posted by Chi_archie

hey strange things happen free kick it the 10 yards and get a good hope and recover, one deep pass for a td

do a traditional onside kick, run 2-3 plays get in fg range, kick the winning kick.

.001% chance of it happening. But I think a kneel down is even less risky

Good post.

It's a decision based on math.

Now try to convince paranoid Mikail of this.

mr. leisure · 10-18-12, 10:37 PM

Originally posted by dante1

nope smart coach call, no fix.

without the safety they get the ball and no chance of seattle winning

wit the safety chance they don't get the ball and seattle has a chance of winning

yes the chance is 1 in a million but without the safety the chance is zero.

smart call

After thinking about this some more i agree .

I didn`t have a cent on either side of this game

RonPaul2008 · 10-18-12, 10:37 PM

Originally posted by SlickRick1382

Someone please explain to me (other than conspiracy theories) why in the world would SF decline that penalty?

They get the safety, get 2 points, they get the ball back anyway, fair catch the safety kick, kneel and game is over anyway.

What's the reasoning behind not taking the 2 points and declining?

Possibility of injuries.

DwightShrute · 10-18-12, 10:38 PM

Originally posted by Dancemanmarc2

IF those are locks you live dangerously

the lock part was sarcastic

but the

was I can't believe he declined it

Chi_archie · 10-18-12, 10:38 PM

you can place kick a free kick. I guess have a holder. you just can't use a tee. you could also drop kick it with a bounce off the ground.

so its theoretically possible to onside it, without having to do a free kick punt onside squib. which you'd just try to softly line drive it maybe 15 -20 yards and away from where all the guys are lined up.

I don't know, i'd loved to have seen it though. doubt many special teams practice to receive one like that

Brock Landers · 10-18-12, 10:39 PM

There's just NO WAY you would EVER decline a penalty that results in a safety. It would never happen

The odds of losing like that are in the billions....like in the movie casino, 3 jackpots at once.

SportsPedagogy · 10-18-12, 10:40 PM

Originally posted by milwaukee mike

No an onside Kick OR an onside punt, their choice

amazing people bet on a sport they don't know the rules of

A free kick after a safety can either be a punt or a kickoff, including an onside kick

Yeah, that rule clearly affects my gambling. I seemed to be doing quite well without it. I am sure you know every single rule then ?

Either way, you can not use a tee on that kickoff, so the onside would be a bit harder with a holder.

Br0nxer · 10-18-12, 10:41 PM

100% right call declining

injury factor

why even risk it

kneel down and games over

had seattle gotten the line to gain for 1st down he would of accepted the holding penalty for safety

when they didnt there was no need to

DwightShrute · 10-18-12, 10:42 PM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

There's just NO WAY you would EVER decline a penalty that results in a safety. It would never happen

The odds of losing like that are in the billions....like in the movie casino, 3 jackpots at once.

I really think you're over reacting

Dancemanmarc2 · 10-18-12, 10:43 PM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

There's just NO WAY you would EVER decline a penalty that results in a safety. It would never happen

The odds of losing like that are in the billions....like in the movie casino, 3 jackpots at once.

But he was the brother in Law of the County Commissioner Brock. "People gotta get lucky sometimes Mr. Rothstein"

Duff85 · 10-18-12, 10:44 PM

Eat a dick lenders my side cashed too.

I was really cheering Wilson though hoping he would fukk you in ass. Ahh well you'll do that to yourself on Saturday and Sunday anyway.

Buy your family something nice or make a fukking payment on that pos car of yours, instead of giving it all back to the books.

Dancemanmarc2 · 10-18-12, 10:44 PM

Originally posted by DwightShrute

I really think you're over reacting

Beat me to it quick fingers

Brock Landers · 10-18-12, 10:44 PM

Originally posted by dwightshrute

i really think you're over reacting

exactly!!!!!!!!!!!!

milwaukee mike · 10-18-12, 10:46 PM

Originally posted by SportsPedagogy

Yeah, that rule clearly affects my gambling. I seemed to be doing quite well without it. I am sure you know every single rule then ?

Either way, you can not use a tee on that kickoff, so the onside would be a bit harder with a holder.

actually the onside kick is much easier because you can punt it straight up into the air or wherever you want

Sorry for the smarminess, i was frustrated that the announcers had no clue why he was declining the penalty

Fang-Banger · 10-18-12, 10:47 PM

Landers how much you lose?

Chi_archie · 10-18-12, 10:49 PM

Originally posted by milwaukee mike

actually the onside kick is much easier because you can punt it straight up into the air or wherever you want

Sorry for the smarminess, i was frustrated that the announcers had no clue why he was declining the penalty

you are forgetting the fair catch rule

coop · 10-18-12, 10:51 PM

People are actually serious with the conspiracy theories. Unreal.

Bottom line:

If he declines the penalty = THEY HAVE WON THE GAME

If he accepts it = THEY HAVE NOT YET WON THE GAME

DwightShrute · 10-18-12, 10:51 PM

Originally posted by Fang-Banger

Landers how much you lose?

my guess it was a 2 team parlay SF -8 and Obama -350

would have lost anyway!

Brock Landers · 10-18-12, 10:53 PM

Originally posted by Fang-Banger

Landers how much you lose?

had the ML pal...

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/1960000-2-fukkin-winners-nfl-college-football-tonight-10-18-2012-a.html

SportsPedagogy · 10-18-12, 10:57 PM

Originally posted by milwaukee mike

actually the onside kick is much easier because you can punt it straight up into the air or wherever you want

Sorry for the smarminess, i was frustrated that the announcers had no clue why he was declining the penalty

No worries. I still like ya haha. It was the right call. You end the game. I think the punt would have been fair caught. Would have been hard to get an onside kick from that spot, and even harder for Seahawks to win, but why risk it. You just end the game.

milwaukee mike · 10-18-12, 10:58 PM

Originally posted by Chi_archie

you are forgetting the fair catch rule

Nobody would call a fair catch on a 10 yd onside kick even if you had some major arc on it, players really aren't that smart

the_orangekat · 10-18-12, 10:59 PM

All you people celebrating that you won a bet on a declined penalty, karma will get you back tomorrow....moose time, baby.

k13 · 10-18-12, 11:01 PM

Originally posted by coop

People are actually serious with the conspiracy theories. Unreal.

Bottom line:

If he declines the penalty = THEY HAVE WON THE GAME

If he accepts it = THEY HAVE NOT YET WON THE GAME

How does a team score 9 points?

I guess onside touchdown onside field goal are pretty realistic.

SportsPedagogy · 10-18-12, 11:03 PM

Originally posted by the_orangekat

All you people celebrating that you won a bet on a declined penalty, karma will get you back tomorrow....moose time, baby.

Really ? I threw some points on 49ers, but it would have been pure luck for the 49ers to cover. Seahawks were the right side

tatommack · 10-18-12, 11:05 PM

i didnt know you could onside kick a safety free kick lol