Bills looks good. Had recommended that pick to someone yesterday, Bears are doin well. It ain't over in Indy.
Lookin good today boys. No 49ers RLM today
Lookin good today boys. No 49ers RLM today
-
Comment -
Bengals covered - yes!Comment -
cincy +7 (started at +8 and went to +7 with 67% on colts) Win
bears -1 (started at +1 and went to -1 with 71% on vikes) WinComment -
CIN + MIA + CHIC!! 3/3
Bills were play - I was not see RLM there went from -3 to - 1.5 with 47% on them?Comment -
what's the play at 4pm? Dallas right?Comment -
Dallas has double digit spread, but looks like RLM.
Evening Pittsburg looks strong, but wait for later line movement.Comment -
in the bills game, detroit went from +3 to +1.5 with 53% on detroit...not RLM
dallas went from +13.5 to +11.5 with 58% on the giants...but Dallas seems to be just like akron in college ball, theyre the exception to the RLM ruleComment -
Do not take Dallas. They were huge RLM last week against Green Bay. Don't trust itComment -
3-0 today!! Gonna be 4-0 with Pitt!!
Hope you all made some cash
Comment -
I didn't. Took detriot anyway
And my local had Dallas at +14, so I took that, too...
Comment -
you guys didn't take Denver? It's RLM play.
Dallas is a RLM play too. It also fall under JM System. I think it's a solid play here.
Comment -
denver opened at +1 and closed at +1...no movement at all so no RLMComment -
There was only 2 RLM plays so far today and both won, for a 2-0 RLM record so far today.
CHI & CINCYComment -
man rlm was great this week!!!!Comment -
den was a good rlm play no??Comment -
ive got two different books telling me the opener was +1...seeing the score now, sure wish i'd seen whatever book u were usingComment -
The ONLY book that I can see that had Denver opening at +2.5 was Cris and it was there for 5 mins before moving to +1. I doubt anyone was able to take it.
Pinny had Denver opening +1.
There was no RLM play on Denver. Just because you "saw" one book open with that line, means zip. The consensus was easily +1 Denver and the line closed as such.Comment -
isn't steelers? opened at 4 at 5.5 nowComment -
i follow pinnacle too...tracking site i used still listed the opener at +1 tho...well congrats, looks like youre going to hit one more winner than me today
Comment -
Yes Steelers is a RLM play and you should be able to get -5 but the line could move, since the game is a couple of hours away.
The Cowboys were a RLM play as the line moved anywhere from 1.5 to 2 pts.
Even though they played like ass last week, it doesn't matter as far as RLM goes.
They changed coaches and looked energized this week to boot.
If the Cowboys hold on for a cover RLM will be 3-0 today with a possible Steelers play tonight.Comment -
Really surprised with Dallas. Congrats to those who took them. I tried them last week and they screwed me over.
Thanks for the points jeeves
Comment -
Toto Thanks again for the picks this week. I am sending you 10 points for turning my year aroundComment -
Glad to see you winning bundy.
Thanks!
Comment -
I have Pittsburgh at -5 so 1 point movement. I am going to place a half unit on Pitt since we should be up 4 units todayComment -
yeah, overall happy with both threads.... and interesting my local has steelers at -4... so just trying to decide what to lay on them...
tough being a huge steeler fan playing a decision in itComment -
Matchbook has Pitt-4.5@+101. Best number I can find at the moment.Comment -
hey guys, does RLM still count if the line moves the opposite way according to the percentage of bets at a certain time?
I.E. -- The dallas-giants game today. In reality, it was RLM because the majority of the public was on the giants, yet the line moved from NY-13.5 to NY -11.5. However I noticed it did this possibly because the percentage bet on the giants gradually DECREASED throughout the week. Would the cowboys still have been RLM since the majority was on the giants and the line moved the wrong way, even though the line movement might have been because the number of bets on the giants decreased throughout the week, therefore the books needing to make an adjustment to get more people back on the giants? Here is a link providing the graph for that particular game http://www.sportsinsights.com/spread...4/2010>ype=4
sorry if thats kind of confusingComment -
thawoj the number of bets does not move the line MONEY moves the line. so what u are saying makes no sense even if there were 50000 bets on giants and dallas only had 15000 and the line moved in giants direction would be because someone who was in the 15000 bets bet a shitload.Comment -
Oh what could have been. I was so shell shocked by yesterdays debacle that I shyed away from a bunch of these plays today. Could have won with Buf, Minny, Mia and Dallas. I only bet Cin. Just a fantastic day for RLM bets. I should have never let yesterdays results effect me for today. I hope everyone got in on all them and took some back from the books.
Going with Pitt...let's get it!!
Comment -
ok, thats what i thought, just wanted to be sure. but to correct my own mistake, i think in that graph (or any of them), when it says "percentage bet on giants" that is money right? or is it # of bets?
if it is indeed 'money', please let me know what you think about my original question (is it really rlm if the line moves because less and less money went on the giants throughout the week, even though by gametime the larger percentage of the public was on the giants?)
if you click the graph link in my above post you can see what i am trying to sayComment -
pinnacle just dropped pitt to -4.5, thats only .5 point of movement...not really RLM anymore, but good luck if you took it alreadyComment -
Yeah there is no RLM on the Steelers now especially at -4.Comment
