2010 NFL System - JM and Modified

[Freddo]

ON3 We have a huge Conundrum Dallas is an official play this week but with Romo out shall we just lay off Dallas this week and be happy with the other three plays?

[cleonhr]

Now guys, we got a problem here.

Next week we should play Dallas and Jacksonville, and they are playing beetwen them.

So who do we play? I guess Dallas cause they got allready 3 lost + 3 lost ATS. Is that correct? Jacksonville is then not a play?

[DustyDiamond]

I'm surprised JM doesn't have some sort of injury filter. Most of his other systems do

[HawkEye]

I think this week we have 3 bets.

Dallas
Denver
San Diego

All 3 L & 3 L ats

[knugen]

Think cincinnatti. Is one to!?

[hagball52]

ON3 We have a huge Conundrum Dallas is an official play this week but with Romo out shall we just lay off Dallas this week and be happy with the other three plays?

The Oddsmakers will adjust the line for that. Besides Jacksonville has their own injury problems at QB. The game is in Dallas and they are the better team.
Just checked the line and Dallas is a 6 1/2 point fav so in the system it is a moneyline bet.

[hagball52]

I'm surprised JM doesn't have some sort of injury filter. Most of his other systems do

I think because the oddsmakers usually adjust the lines during the week for injuries. In any case it's something I always check myself and then decide to play or wait and see.

[cmdyrds]

3 losses ATS & outright

dallas
denver
cincy
san diego

2 losses ATS & outright and still 500 or above

chicago

can someone give me an ok so i didn't miss anything? thanks.

[on3]

3 losses ATS & outright

dallas
denver
cincy
san diego

2 losses ATS & outright and still 500 or above

chicago

can someone give me an ok so i didn't miss anything? thanks.

You're good to go. Chicago has a bye week, so they will be a play then.

[cmdyrds]

You're good to go. Chicago has a bye week, so they will be a play then.

thank you

[dukipl]

Our teams: Dallas, Denver, Cincinnati, San Diego.

[Thirsty P]

Dallas Cowboys = 2nd string quarterback. Does this affect the system play in anyway. I know the linesmakers have factored this in but does it have any affect on if this is a play/no play?

[on3]

Dallas is a play.

[on3]

Stupid question maybe, but id your lines 3 different lines, and uf it is 3 different, why? Or is it only one wery long?

3 lines for A bet, B bet, and C bet

[knugen]

Are Dallas à play on ML or ATS? It's very high juice on ML!

[HawkEye]

Is it a good idea to make these a parlay?

[bauerranch]

From Jim

Here are the Invincible NFL Betting System bet(s) for today:

Cincinnati [A]
Dallas [A]
San Diego [A]
Denver [A]

Remember, this system has never lost in 6 years. Last year it went
for a perfect 23-0, with the [C] bet coming into play only ONE time
(which we easily won)! It is 1-0 so far this year.

Always bet on the point spread if the team you're betting on is the
underdog (which happens most of the time), and on the money line
if the team you're betting for is the favorite. An underdog team
will always have a positive number in the point spread, while a
favorite will always have a negative number in the point spread.

I also advise buying half a point (.5) if the team you're betting
on has an exact point spread of either +3 or +7, and buy 1 point if
they have an exact point spread of either +2.5 or +6.5.

Note that if you're betting on the point spread, then as long as
the team you're betting on is able to cover the point spread, you
will win your wager, regardless if they had won or lost the game.
For example, if your team has a point spread of +6, and they end up
losing the game by 5 points, then yes, you would have won the bet
since your team did not lose by more than 6 points.

[makaveli66]

Who's Jim?

[million2one]

Dallas should roll today, if they can't win this game, then they are really bad

[makaveli66]

I thought his name was JOHN Morrison..

[knugen]

damn i didnt bought that 1 point on broncos, i got them at +2,5 so they had to score

[on3]

The cowboys suck.

[knugen]

im glad i skipppped them

[knugen]

can someone plz explain what this "big plays" are, im trying to learn the rules of football...

[bauerranch]

Your right his name is JOHN- not JIM- It was too early in the morning for me

[knugen]

this night suck

[on3]

well those two games that looked good through 3Q kinda shit the bed. lets hope the chargers and the saints (non-system) rally to keep the day from getting too ugly.

[cleonhr]

0-3. Excellent (A) bets.... How gonna look (B) bets? I'm not quite sure if those should be followed at all?

Lets hope that San Diego will pull a win, or I'm dead broke on this weekend loses on JM systems.....

[knugen]

Wtf are chargers doing

[bauerranch]

This is one ugly Sunday!

[venture]

Only onw c bet last year, so are you going to load up next week? i think i'm going to, 2 of 3 should win right?

[allenc85]

Really need the Chargers here...

[DustyDiamond]

This is such a weird football season, who would have said that Dallas would be sitting at 1-6 right now.

[on3]

rough night. SD was the only official win, and congrats to anyone who played New Orleans on the LWL .500 trend. On to the next one...

system record: 2-0 (3 series pending)

system week 9 plays (lost 3 SU and 3 ATS):

B - Cincinnati
B - Denver
B - Dallas

system week 10 potential plays (lost 2 SU and 2 ATS):

Arizona
Minnesota

mod system record: 2-0

mod system week 9 plays (.500 or better record, lost 2 SU and 2 ATS):

A - Chicago

mod system week 10 potential plays (.500 or better record, lost 1 SU and 1 ATS):

Pittsburgh
Philadelphia
Tennessee
NY Jets
Seattle

LWL .500 system record: 4-1 (no chasing)

Washington

[on3]

Labby line:

This is what my labby line looks like --

x-50-50-x-135-55-67
50-50-50-50-135-55-67
50-50-50-50

After some shuffling...

50-135-50-67-55
50-50-105-117-135
50-50-50-50

My three B bets for next week will be for 185, 167, and 105
My A bet for next week will be for 105