Div round Home teams cover 20-34% since 2003

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • USCMD
    SBR Rookie
    • 10-31-10
    • 49

    #1
    Div round Home teams cover 20-34% since 2003
    1st round bye + >50% public support = 20%cover rate

    in regular season, teams coming off a bye cover 53.1%, if favored, it jumps to 58.1%. In the playoffs (since 2003) it flips. Thought is, the points they give up are too much. the number drops to 34%, 16-30. If they receive >50% of the bets the number drops to 20%, 4-16.

    Both fans and analysts believe bye weeks are crucial for postseason success. By earning a top-two seed, players are able to rest and recuperate, while coaches have more time to study film and develop a strong game plan.
    During the regular season, teams coming off a bye week have offered a clear-cut edge for bettors. Since 2003, teams have gone 217-192 ATS (53.1 percent) when they have at least 13 days between games. That record improves to 125-90 ATS (58.1 percent) when we highlight favorites coming off a bye week.
    These well-rested teams have clearly offered value during the regular season but, as we mentioned last week, playoff betting strategies are an entirely different beast.
    At Sports Insights, we love going against the grain, espousing unpopular viewpoints. Our strategies uncover value by challenging public perception, and taking advantage of artificially inflated lines. Since the narrative dictates a substantial benefit to earning a first-round bye, we hypothesized the exact opposite would be true, and there would be value betting against top-two seeds during the divisional round.
    Teams that earned a first-round bye have been favored in more than 80 percent of their games during the divisional round. We believed these teams would be vastly overvalued -- particularly when they were receiving overwhelming public support.
    Using our Bet Labs data analysis software, we found favorites coming off a first-round bye have gone just 16-30 against the spread (34.8 percent) in the divisional round. When that team is receiving more than 50 percent of spread bets, the record plummets to 4-16 against the spread (20 percent).
    With such a woeful record, this system offers the perfect "fade" opportunity, meaning we will bet against teams fitting these criteria. Specifically, we will focus on underdogs who played in the wild-card round when they face off against a rested team following their bye week.
    Opponent Coming off Bye Week 30-18 (62.5%)
    Underdog, Opponent Coming off Bye Week 30-16 (65.2%)
    'Dog <50% of spread bets, Opp. Coming off Bye 16-4 (80.0%)
    * Closing lines from Pinnacle were used to determine records.

  • Igor_1965
    SBR MVP
    • 04-18-15
    • 2633

    #2
    Nice find. What type of subscription do you have? Is this type of writeup available even for the basic sub?
    Comment
    • Jeff_Black
      SBR MVP
      • 04-04-15
      • 3571

      #3
      I have zero confidence in those top seeds coming off the bye but I do think the Patriots needed it badly with some of the injuries they have had.
      The Miami loss doesn't bother me too much as it was a similar situation in Buffalo and they didn't even bother playing Brady.
      Comment
      • slacker00
        SBR Posting Legend
        • 10-06-05
        • 12262

        #4
        Why choose "since 2003"? If you choose 2009, it's 50%. If you choose 1990, it's 50%. Very deceptive sample chosen.
        Comment
        • Jeep_Life 42
          SBR MVP
          • 09-28-15
          • 1388

          #5
          Originally posted by Jeff_Black
          I have zero confidence in those top seeds coming off the bye but I do think the Patriots needed it badly with some of the injuries they have had.
          The Miami loss doesn't bother me too much as it was a similar situation in Buffalo and they didn't even bother playing Brady.
          never go against Brady In the playoffs
          Comment
          • Jeff_Black
            SBR MVP
            • 04-04-15
            • 3571

            #6
            Oh I don't plan too! If there is an overachieved team out of the current lot it's the Chiefs. The others I'm hardly surprised are there.
            Comment
            • rake922
              SBR Posting Legend
              • 12-23-07
              • 11692

              #7
              all the home teams are getting more than 50% of the bets
              Comment
              • USCMD
                SBR Rookie
                • 10-31-10
                • 49

                #8
                Originally posted by Igor_1965
                Nice find. What type of subscription do you have? Is this type of writeup available even for the basic sub?
                Igor, nothing fancy. ESPN has a chalk area, where they explore the differences between sharp and squares. Small "insider fee" and in that area they've run a weekly feature on contrarian betting. Why some atypical strategies work. I found this there.

                It was a jaw dropper. Often the top seeds coast into week 19, while other teams can start in a playoff mind set, in week 14 or 15.

                Remember lines are about perception of talent, not talent itself. So giving the rd dog, enough points to even out the betting, often creates an edge for sharp bettors. All 4 games this week meet the criteria. So it will be interesting how many road teams cover. Injuries hurt Pit. I believe 2 or 3 of the road pups will cover. Sea, KC, are the 2 obvious games.

                We'll see. BOL 2 all!

                yes. insider is $60 a year. You get the weekly magazine and stuff in all sports. All of the contrarian betting articles are available in the chalk area.

                espn dot go dot com /chalk/

                scroll down about 5 entries to Solar: Best NFL contrarian bets for divisional round
                Comment
                • USCMD
                  SBR Rookie
                  • 10-31-10
                  • 49

                  #9
                  Why 2003? You'll have to ask David Solar.


                  The idea was to contrast the edge a bye can create in the regular season, with the one in wc weekend. 4 very public teams rest and garner a perception, bye = good, on top of team finishing 1 or 2.

                  You can't blame the author for picking a break point with a bit of sensationalism.



                  I'll say this, if given the choice of picking all dogs or all favs...........I would go dogs
                  B
                  Comment
                  • BankrollMafia
                    SBR Wise Guy
                    • 08-30-15
                    • 654

                    #10
                    Cardinals will cover the spread against packers again.
                    Comment
                    • GunShard
                      SBR Posting Legend
                      • 03-05-10
                      • 10031

                      #11
                      Interesting stat. I'll start tracking this each year and see how often the road team covers the spread.
                      Comment
                      • slacker00
                        SBR Posting Legend
                        • 10-06-05
                        • 12262

                        #12
                        Originally posted by USCMD
                        Why 2003? You'll have to ask David Solar.
                        ...
                        You can't blame the author for picking a break point with a bit of sensationalism.
                        ...
                        Actually, I can and I do, it's basically calling a spade a spade. It's bad math and it's a lie.

                        It boils down to 2003 they went 0-4 and therefore it applies today?! Give me a break ESPN.
                        Comment
                        • SportsInsights
                          SBR High Roller
                          • 01-05-09
                          • 119

                          #13
                          Hey guys-- for anyone curious, those trends come from Bet Labs Sports dot com, and the archived data goes back to 2003 which is why that year is always used.
                          Comment
                          • slacker00
                            SBR Posting Legend
                            • 10-06-05
                            • 12262

                            #14
                            Originally posted by SportsInsights
                            Hey guys-- for anyone curious, those trends come from Bet Labs Sports dot com, and the archived data goes back to 2003 which is why that year is always used.
                            They've only got data back to 2003? That's pretty pathetic.

                            Their trend went 1-2-1 this weekend. It was a good fade at best.

                            Do they have anything for next weekend? I'll be happy to try and shoot it full of holes again.
                            Comment
                            • 2daBank
                              SBR Aristocracy
                              • 01-26-09
                              • 88966

                              #15
                              Originally posted by slacker00
                              They've only got data back to 2003? That's pretty pathetic.

                              Their trend went 1-2-1 this weekend. It was a good fade at best.

                              Do they have anything for next weekend? I'll be happy to try and shoot it full of holes again.
                              hopefully anyone with any sense read your responses picking apart that gibberish and realized swiss cheese has fewer holes than these "trends" that almost always have a "random" date plucked out of thin air that happens to be a year it did incredibly well.

                              nice job bringing some logic to this thread
                              Comment
                              Search
                              Collapse
                              SBR Contests
                              Collapse
                              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                              Collapse
                              Working...