John Morrison 2010 NBA

[fotzan]

Dallas was a surprise cover for me. Did Nowitski play today?

[nitsuj378]

Dallas was a surprise cover for me. Did Nowitski play today?

No he didn't. It was definately a surprise. They were down anywhere between 17 and 24 the entire game. Gotta love sports betting. Never over til the horn/buzzer/whistle. LOL

[J.M. Disciple]

I lost 4 out of the last 6 on double digit underdogs, buying 3pts as well! I'm done with them. Strictly JM, and SBP systems for now on.

[jphil]

cleve. . was sac. the 1st C loss this season for TPS? haven't followed from beginning. flat bettin tps currently & just increasing on the next few games now w/ the previous sac. & now 2 cleve. losses.

[atari5200]

i know the spreads are made accordingly, but cleveland is garbage. i wish they weren't, one unprofessional idiot decided to change all that in one season.

what happened to the NYK today? i didn't watch but, wtf? the kings in the garden won by 10?

to all those who didn't buy the 3 points on dallas, i'm with you. I don't sweat it, it's not too bad of a loss and can easily be made up on another series or we can look at a possible c bet.

[J.M. Disciple]

cleve. . was sac. the 1st C loss this season for TPS? haven't followed from beginning. flat bettin tps currently & just increasing on the next few games now w/ the previous sac. & now 2 cleve. losses.

cleveland was not a C bet.

[J.M. Disciple]

cleve. . was sac. the 1st C loss this season for TPS? haven't followed from beginning. flat bettin tps currently & just increasing on the next few games now w/ the previous sac. & now 2 cleve. losses.

He got his first loss the other day with SAC i believe.

[J.M. Disciple]

going back to a previous question i asked. Does the Dallas series contradict Stanely's rule of not betting a team that has another series within 1 month of eachother? Should we start ignoring that rule? Or do we just not bet their next series on the 2nd since they covered this one?

[J.M. Disciple]

Nets covered 100-88 at +15.5

Crusher 0-2 today. lost detroit hockey and lost nyk vs sac
TPS 1-1 won nets [A] lost cleveland [B]
JM 2-0 both B bets with Dallas and nets tonight. 1-0 if you count stanelys rule.
SBP: 4-0 tonight

I need to avoid crusher and just stick to SBP and JM. Could of been 6-0 tonight.

[J.M. Disciple]

JM is on a 17-1 run if you are only betting on B and C. his 1 loss is a B bet which was covered right after. gotta stop being so greedy and stick to these two systems. So easy to follow and so little effort put into it. It really is just like printing money.

[fotzan]

New Jersey Nets covered.!

[J.M. Disciple]

I was just doing the math behind it, but i believe SBP both systems are up around 20 units now, so thats 40 units between those two systems. Also JM is on a 17-1 run if your just betting B and C dating back since the 15th of december. When i say 17-1 the 1 loss is a B bet, which was covered by C.

so if your betting to win 2 units on B and covering your losses with C thats +36 units for JM over the last 30 days. + 40 units for the SBP systems.

so +76 units roughly this season for those 3 systems.

Starting to really love the NBA

[nitsuj378]

I was just doing the math behind it, but i believe SBP both systems are up around 20 units now, so thats 40 units between those two systems. Also JM is on a 17-1 run if your just betting B and C dating back since the 15th of december. When i say 17-1 the 1 loss is a B bet, which was covered by C.

so if your betting to win 2 units on B and covering your losses with C thats +36 units for JM over the last 30 days. + 40 units for the SBP systems.

so +76 units roughly this season for those 3 systems.

Starting to really love the NBA

I'm not religious but AMEN!!!!

[stevex]

J.M. The key to this racket is sticking to a system. Yes, Crusher has lost 3 in a row in basketball (all at -110 odds mind you), but 2 weeks ago he won 6-7 in a row so your going to have your ups and downs whether its SBP, JM, or Crusher or whatever system you follow. If you decide to pick and choose what and who your going to follow it will just lead to disaster to your BR, simple as that.

[nitsuj378]

I was going over my spreadsheet and I am trying to figure out where my info differs for the results posted here. It is a spreadsheet I attained somewhere from this forum. It had all the series' on it laid out and what version they were. I didn't start this system until December. Looking back I noticed there are series on there from preseason. Has anyone played this from preseason? Does the backtested data posted in here contain preseason games? Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

EDIT
Also just to confirm....if there road trip of more than 3 games the A bet starts on the first road game correct? Thanks again.

[UCcats]

Good day for JM 3 0. And the cyclones were good. Any way JM has an echl betting system ha

[kjrudemi]

Anyone who doesn't buy points on Dallas against the Grizzlies tonight?

[atari5200]

sure why not.

[lennytia]

going back to a previous question i asked. Does the Dallas series contradict Stanely's rule of not betting a team that has another series within 1 month of eachother? Should we start ignoring that rule? Or do we just not bet their next series on the 2nd since they covered this one?

Stanleys filter eliminates the vast majority of the series losses.
Inevitabley you will miss some winners

[Kev the Brit]

[Originally Posted by J.M. Disciple going back to a previous question i asked. Does the Dallas series contradict Stanely's rule of not betting a team that has another series within 1 month of eachother? Should we start ignoring that rule? Or do we just not bet their next series on the 2nd since they covered this one?

Stanleys filter eliminates the vast majority of the series losses. Inevitabley you will miss some winners

Stanley's filter has no sporting/motivational foundation to it, so its purely luck that it works, sometimes. Its on the same basis as not betting on a series that starts on a specific day of the week, just because the stats for a year or so suggest that it would filter out losses.

[bauerranch]

He got his first loss the other day with SAC i believe.

You are correct

[streak1234]

SBP

Would someone be so kind as to direct me to where i might find information concerning the SBP System?

Thanks

[knugen]

is it any serie atrting today? toronto?

[jphil]

cleveland was not a C bet.

thanx. i realized that.

[Wallco99]

Anyone who doesn't buy points on Dallas against the Grizzlies tonight?

Me.

[Kev the Brit]

cleveland was not a C bet.

It is tonight..

[lennytia]

As long as it works

[lennytia]

Stanley's filter has no sporting/motivational foundation to it, so its purely luck that it works, sometimes. Its on the same basis as not betting on a series that starts on a specific day of the week, just because the stats for a year or so suggest that it would filter out losses.

as long as it works...

[krzychu78]

JM's NBA system:
01/14/2011 New Jersey @ L.A. Lakers - V1, B bet - WIN
01/14/2011 Dallas @ San Antonio - V3, B bet - WIN

V1record so far (finished series): 26-2
(A): 10-18
(B): 13-5
(C): 3-2
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10

V2 record so far (finished series): 15-1
(A): 11-5
(B): 2-3
(C): 2-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03

V3 record so far (finished series): 31-1
(A): 15-17
(B): 14-3
(C): 2-1
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07

Next JM's plays:
01/15/2011 Toronto @ Washington - V2, A bet

[DustyDiamond]

krzychu78 thanks for keeping such great records of the system play

[Jcarlos7180]

Thanks for post the next bets JM daily.

[Jcarlos7180]

We bet A,b and c system or only b and c with V2?

Thanks for your post

[Vince724]

For the season series for V2 if you played A,B,C for V2 you'd be up 7 units. If you only played B,C you'd be up 1 unit. So I'm playing A,B,C. As long as you buy the 3 points.

[jphil]

WilllllBaaaaa!!!!!!

[atari5200]

the mavs can't score 20 in a quarter even with dirk. hmm. very funny. i'll take the loss on this one. glad i kept it cheap. it's easy to make up for a loss when you don't buy the points. great job raptors for keeping it close enough.