Why is the ACC Perceived Weak

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WorkHorse
    SBR MVP
    • 08-22-10
    • 2185

    #1
    Why is the ACC Perceived Weak
    There seems to be a perception out there among the college football world that the Atlantic Coast Conference is a weak football league. Talent doesn't seem to be an issue when you consider in the past five years, the ACC has had more players drafted into the NFL (160) than any other conference except the SEC (229). So why the lack of respect?

    * In the past ten years, the ACC is 35-40 in bowl games.
    * The ACC hasn't had a team finish the regular season with one or zero losses since Maryland in 2001.
    * In the past five seasons, Florida State, Clemson and Georgia Tech have gone 4-11 against intrastate rivals Florida, South Carolina and Georgia.
    * Since the BCS began in 1998, the ACC is 3-14 in bowl games.
    * Since the BCS began, only one team (Virginia Tech) has been selected as an at-large BCS bowl participant.

    It's obvious the ACC has players from the respect the league gets from the NFL...so what's the problem. Is it coaching, commitment from the schools, basketball...I'm not sure...welcome your comments.

  • pouyasophy
    SBR MVP
    • 01-11-13
    • 1665

    #2
    because they always are/ thread
    Comment
    • BigdaddyQH
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 07-13-09
      • 19531

      #3
      The ACC gets some outstanding players, but that is all. They do not have the depth on their teams that teams from the SEC and Pac 12 have. That is what is killing them.
      Comment
      • WorkHorse
        SBR MVP
        • 08-22-10
        • 2185

        #4
        At the recent ACC spring meetings, the league's coaches voted unanimously to stick to an eight game conference slate. The rational for this is pretty straight-forward. For programs with a long-standing rivalry game against an in-state rival, a schedule that includes nine conference games, a rivalry game and Notre Dame once every three years is very limiting. This type of schedule provides little flexibility for programs to schedule interesting non-conference matchups such as Clemson-Georgia (2013) or Florida State-Oklahoma State (2014).

        Non-Conference Schedule

        Boston College: Villanova, @ USC, Army, @ New Mexico St.
        Clemson: Georgia, S. Carolina St., The Citadel, @ South Carolina
        Duke: N. Carolina Central, @ Memphis, Troy, Navy
        Florida St: Nevada, Bethune-Cookman, Idaho, @ Florida
        Georgia Tech: Elon, @ BYU, Alabama A&M, Georgia
        Maryland: Fla-International, Old Dominion, @ UConn, West Virginia (Baltimore)
        Miami: Fla-Atlantic, Florida, Savannah St., @ South Florida
        North Carolina St: La Tech, Richmond, Central Michigan, East Carolina
        Pittsburgh: New Mexico, Old Dominion, @ Navy, Notre Dame
        Syracuse: Penn St. (NJ), @ Northwestern, Wagner, Tulane
        Virginia: BYU, Oregon, VMI, Ball State
        Virginia Tech: Alabama (Atlanta), West Carolina, @ East Carolina, Marshall
        Wake Forest: Presbyterian, La-Monroe, @ Army, @ Vanderbilt
        North Carolina: @ South Carolina, Middle Tenn, East Carolina, Old Dominion
        Comment
        • BigdaddyQH
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 07-13-09
          • 19531

          #5
          In other words, the ACC is so weak that they are afraid that if they cannot get at least two cream puffs on each and every schedule, they will not be able to fill their allotment of Bowl games. This is pathetic.
          Comment
          • Mac4Lyfe
            SBR Aristocracy
            • 01-04-09
            • 48806

            #6
            ACC has good talent but very poor coaching. It starts with head coaches then it filters down to assistants. Most ACC teams pay assistants peanuts compared to the SEC which is a big problem. The biggest problem is that it is and always will be a basketball conference. Schools like FSU try in vain to pump up football but get out voted on anything that will help the league strengthen it's football.
            Comment
            • WorkHorse
              SBR MVP
              • 08-22-10
              • 2185

              #7
              Mac, I think you make a valid point about assistant coaches not being paid the salaries of some other conferences. Good assistant coaches make or break a program. Money talks and many of the good ones walk. I'm sure the ACC has some good coaches but maybe not the quality of other conferences....especially the SEC.
              Comment
              • daneblazer
                BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                • 09-14-08
                • 27862

                #8
                Outside of Florida State, Clemson, and Virginia Tech nobody gives a damn about football.

                Miami's president is killing them. UNC & Duke talk basketball 365. To a lesser degree Wake and NC State do too and the stadium is 10 miles away from the campus in Raleigh. Virginia is fru fru. Georgia Tech runs the option.

                Most of these schools also have pretty tough academic standards. At FSU if you can run a 4.3, they'll find a way to get you in the school. Duke, GT, BC, not so much.

                FSU and Clemson have come really close to leaving the conference. I'm not entirely sure they won't after it's all said and done.
                Comment
                Search
                Collapse
                SBR Contests
                Collapse
                Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                Collapse
                Working...