Wow, was the line u got on shields before or after the pitching change? Up to -135 at 5 dimes!
LTA's MLB Plays
Collapse
X
-
Donnie BrascoSBR Wise Guy
- 01-04-11
- 862
#3116Comment -
RedscotSBR MVP
- 05-16-11
- 2571
#3117Originally posted by Love The ActionI would have rather faced hughes, but I'm not worried. I played shields/action, so my play stands as long as shields starts. I figured this would be a possibility because of hughes' back spasms, but noesi won't be able to go more than 5 innings. Tampa should hit today and wih them facing cc later, they know this first game is crucial.
Were you thinking they may possibly slot C.C. into first game when you played action? I agree that this 1st game is huge for them and Shields has been an ace this year. Not up on my board yet, GLComment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3118Holy crap...shields is now -135 after the pitching change....I could have had a huge middle if I put a max bet on shields at +108...
Gotta love beating the closer by fifty centsComment -
RedscotSBR MVP
- 05-16-11
- 2571
#3119Originally posted by Love The ActionHoly crap...shields is now -135 after the pitching change....I could have had a huge middle if I put a max bet on shields at +108...
Gotta love beating the closer by fifty cents
Interesting Maddon has rookie Lobaton catching him in this big spot, that is showing a lot of confidence.Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3120Originally posted by RedscotWere you thinking they may possibly slot C.C. into first game when you played action? I agree that this 1st game is huge for them and Shields has been an ace this year. Not up on my board yet, GLComment -
Gio21SBR MVP
- 11-13-09
- 1594
#3121Originally posted by Love The ActionI considered it, but that would not have been the right call by girardi. Why go ace versus ace, when he could try to steal the first game and then have a huge pitching advantage by having cc ready to go for game 2...it was a calculated gamble that worked out well....now the rays just need to winComment -
RedscotSBR MVP
- 05-16-11
- 2571
#3122WTF just happend to the Angels line?Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3123Originally posted by RedscotWTF just happend to the Angels line?
I have not had a line move thirty cents against me all year. Something is going on that is out of the ordinary...hopefully we get lucky, but its a losing play for me regardless of final outcome....weird...Comment -
RedscotSBR MVP
- 05-16-11
- 2571
#3124Originally posted by Love The ActionI have no idea...worst call by me in a long time. I think some sort of info came out that is not publicly available....
I have not had a line move thirty cents against me all year. Something is going on that is out of the ordinary...hopefully we get lucky, but its a losing play for me regardless of final outcome....weird.... I do have Tor +155 available to me atm, already bought 1 unit.
Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3125Originally posted by RedscotCan't factor that into your model bro, that's just some bad luck. I am curious what it is. I do have Tor +155 available to me atm, already bought 1 unit.
I suppose I could buy out and eat the juice, but I want to find out what's going on first...i still like Haren in this comeback spot...i can't imagine this move is based on his poor history against yoronto...Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3126No ramirez or pena for the cubs, so hopefully that helps our under...
I really missed the boat by not locking that reds/astros over in at 8....too late now.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#3127Like most of your plays LTA, though I'm on the other side of your Jays bet. Got it at a good price last night.
BOL my friend.Comment -
bigballer891SBR MVP
- 06-12-10
- 1683
#3128Originally posted by Love The ActionSomeone or multiple guys in the Angels lineup must be out...either that, or I just made a huge miscalculation....i believe it's the former as opposed to ther latter, but we will find out when the lineups are released.
I suppose I could buy out and eat the juice, but I want to find out what's going on first...i still like Haren in this comeback spot...i can't imagine this move is based on his poor history against yoronto...
I think you just miscalculated that one LTA, that line was just massively inflated because LA needs to win and toronto does not. Scosica has been wearing the shit out of haren and weaver all year. Mcgowan is a top prospect who has just been injured for the last year. Nobody really knows what he's going to do. He could dominate or get lit up. Not to mention, Harens career mark at the rodgers centre and the blue jays have the edge in batting. I think somewhere in the -130 range would be fair value for the angels. GL tonite LTA.Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3129Originally posted by No coincidencesLike most of your plays LTA, though I'm on the other side of your Jays bet. Got it at a good price last night.
BOL my friend.
Any idea why the angels price dropped so precipitously?Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#3130Originally posted by Love The ActionSame to you
Any idea why the angels price dropped so precipitously?Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3131Originally posted by bigballer891I think you just miscalculated that one LTA, that line was just massively inflated because LA needs to win and toronto does not. Scosica has been wearing the shit out of haren and weaver all year. Mcgowan is a top prospect who has just been injured for the last year. Nobody really knows what he's going to do. He could dominate or get lit up. Not to mention, Harens career mark at the rodgers centre and the blue jays have the edge in batting. I think somewhere in the -130 range would be fair value for the angels. GL tonite LTA.
Plus, even though he was a solid prospect, he never really performed well in mlb games except for 2007...4 years ago!!!
If this huge line move is based solely on harens poor history against toronto and the mere possibility that mcgowan will pitch well, as opposed to a couple guys being out for the angels, I may add to the play as opposed to buying out.
Sorry, I'm not buying the mcgowan for cy young bs...
Its hard to believe my model and I made such a huge miscalculation.Comment -
bigballer891SBR MVP
- 06-12-10
- 1683
#3132Originally posted by Love The ActionPerhaps I undervalued Mcgowan...but this is only his third mlb start back after two tears of rehab...
Plus, even though he was a solid prospect, he never really performed well in mlb games except for 2007...4 years ago!!!
If this huge line move is based solely on harens poor history against toronto and the mere possibility that mcgowan will pitch well, as opposed to a couple guys being out for the angels, I may add to the play as opposed to buying out.
Sorry, I'm not buying the mcgowan for cy young bs...
Its hard to believe my model and I made such a huge miscalculation.Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3133Originally posted by bigballer891I never said anything about cy young. He was a young guy with great stuff learning how to pitch before he got injured. His aggregate numbers dont tell the whole story. He was starting to come around before the injury, he was really showing signs of possibly becoming a top 2 pitcher on the team. Again, obviously at this point, nobody knows what hes capable of but the potential is certainly there.
Thanks...do you know if he's on a pitch count? I can't imagine his endurance is very high right now....maybe five innings at best and then torontos bullpen is in play...
Good luck in whatever you playComment -
bigballer891SBR MVP
- 06-12-10
- 1683
#3134Originally posted by Love The ActionI know you never said cy young...i was taking in general.
Thanks...do you know if he's on a pitch count? I can't imagine his endurance is very high right now....maybe five innings at best and then torontos bullpen is in play...
Good luck in whatever you playComment -
EdV38SBR Sharp
- 04-04-09
- 266
#3135No, you didn't undervalue McGowan. Until he gets his K:BB rate better than 1 there's no reason to assume he's back to 2007 (I think that was his one good year - not looking it up) form.
Personally, I think you overvalued Haren in this spot. Does your model take into account pitcher's performances at the ballpark they are pitching? I know you said 32 innings is not enough (usually 30 instances of something is enough to be considered statistically significant). But if 32 innings is not enough for a guy that's been pitching as long as Haren has, you'll pretty much never get any statistically significant numbers outside of inter-divisional games.Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3136Originally posted by EdV38No, you didn't undervalue McGowan. Until he gets his K:BB rate better than 1 there's no reason to assume he's back to 2007 (I think that was his one good year - not looking it up) form.
Personally, I think you overvalued Haren in this spot. Does your model take into account pitcher's performances at the ballpark they are pitching? I know you said 32 innings is not enough (usually 30 instances of something is enough to be considered statistically significant). But if 32 innings is not enough for a guy that's been pitching as long as Haren has, you'll pretty much never get any statistically significant numbers outside of inter-divisional games.
I use my model to identify possible plays with value. Once those plays are identified, then I cap those particular games from every angle possible. If the play fits my model and passes muster after capping it further, I then make it a play.
Thanks for your contribution today and please feel free to provide your input more often.
I would be interested in hearing other people's thoughts as well on when statistical significance is reached when considering pitcher/batter historical matchup data. I am generally of the belief that you need about 500 at bats against one pitcher to have any true statistically significant data for that matchup. Otherwise, head to head matchups are considered, but the weight I give it varies.Comment -
goldengreekSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-25-07
- 8340
#3137Got rid of God1 for you guys... enjoy
Good luck LTA and the rest of you guys !Comment -
RedscotSBR MVP
- 05-16-11
- 2571
#3138Originally posted by goldengreekGot rid of God1 for you guys... enjoy
Good luck LTA and test rest of you guys !. I'm taking bets on his next screen name. I think Holy Roller would be good or maybe Divine Intervention
.
Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3139Well that yankee game sure sucked....we were winning the entire game until the bottom of the 8th when the yankees scored 3 to hand TB the loss...ouch.Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3140Just missed the big move on the indians under....line must have changed right before I hit confirm.
Definitely not playing it at 8, so hopefully they saved me some money.
Looking at kc and kc under right now.Comment -
RedscotSBR MVP
- 05-16-11
- 2571
#3141Originally posted by Love The ActionJust missed the big move on the indians under....line must have changed right before I hit confirm.
Definitely not playing it at 8, so hopefully they saved me some money.
Looking at kc and kc under right now..
I was able to grab Clev 8 1/2 at -105 fortunately (well, we will see if fortunately)
Been staring at that K.C under all day man. Honestly I am more worried about K.C. putting up runs than Detroit! Maybe I need to play K.C., they have been stroking and they split with Detroit before Detroit went on their big winning streak.Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3142Trout and Kendrick both out of the lineup tonight...why the fuk would they sit kendrick!?!? Well that explains part of the big move, but not all of it
Not feeling particularly good about play #1 right now.
Also missed the line move on kc and kc under because of work. Coupled with that rough loss in ny and this has not been my day so far.Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3143Originally posted by RedscotGlad I tailed you on that Cubs under bro.
I was able to grab Clev 8 1/2 at -105 fortunately (well, we will see if fortunately)
Been staring at that K.C under all day man. Honestly I am more worried about K.C. putting up runs than Detroit! Maybe I need to play K.C., they have been stroking and they split with Detroit before Detroit went on their big winning streak.Comment -
Gio21SBR MVP
- 11-13-09
- 1594
#3144.....Comment -
RedscotSBR MVP
- 05-16-11
- 2571
#3145Originally posted by Love The ActionTrout and Kendrick both out of the lineup tonight...why the fuk would they sit kendrick!?!? Well that explains part of the big move, but not all of it
Not feeling particularly good about play #1 right now.
Also missed the line move on kc and kc under because of work. Coupled with that rough loss in ny and this has not been my day so far.
I am sure whatever was taking up your time at work will bring more income to you and your fam than the K.C. game my man. You have been killing it lately, enjoy the spoils
Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3146Originally posted by RedscotGame still has to be played bro, McGowan is no sure thing and Angels are still favored to win.
I am sure whatever was taking up your time at work will bring more income to you and your fam than the K.C. game my man. You have been killing it lately, enjoy the spoils
Comment -
RedscotSBR MVP
- 05-16-11
- 2571
#3147Originally posted by Love The ActionGood point...I'm not one take anything for granted and I'm lucky enough to have a career and employer which provides me with the flexibility to get a ton of capping done at the office. Especially with this economy and job climate, everyone with a stable job should be thankful. Thanks for reminding me about priorities.
Comment -
guil0000SBR Sharp
- 01-18-11
- 472
#3148Lawrie out for the JaysComment -
alamoSBR Hall of Famer
- 02-21-09
- 7131
#3149Hi LTA, I took the Angels in running (Bet365 excellent for inrunning!) at Even money after middle of the 1st. I find this to be a very profitable way of beating the juice and recommend it. Just said id share !Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#3150Originally posted by alamoHi LTA, I took the Angels in running (Bet365 excellent for inrunning!) at Even money after middle of the 1st. I find this to be a very profitable way of beating the juice and recommend it. Just said id share !Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code