Originally posted by No coincidences
-
Added at -120Comment -
I know the Angels need a win here, but I can't believe people are backing Pineiro in Toronto -- regardless of who's pitching for the Jays. Talk about playing with fire.Originally posted by God1Comment -
Looking good LTA, plays 3 & 4 looking like unusual spots where you won't beat the closer. On all but the Marlins as I am still -110. Lets get it! GL all
.
Comment -
Originally posted by No coincidencesMy only play tonight (unless I roll the dice with the Dodgers later).
Let's get it LTA.
Where is the edge between Lincecum and Kershaw. They are both so dominant....Comment -
Wish I could but my local is being really stingy with that game. Been at -135 since I got home this afternoon, no thanks.Originally posted by God1Comment -
Trying to find one. Kershaw could come out and make a Cy Young statement while derailing the Dodgers' arch rival, but it's hard to bet against Lince given SF's current form.Originally posted by Love The Action
Where is the edge between Lincecum and Kershaw. They are both so dominant....Comment -
Don't remind meOriginally posted by RedscotLooking good LTA, plays 3 & 4 looking like unusual spots where you won't beat the closer. On all but the Marlins as I am still -110. Lets get it! GL all.
In all fairness, I had wanted to wait on plays 2, 3 & 4 until this morning/afternoon to play but I knew I would be stuck in a work meeting to start my day and wouldn't be able to watch the lines . Therefore, I jumped on decent odds last night. It worked out well for that rockies under, but not so much for the reds under or padres under. Oh well....Comment -
I like the Reds over, but I'm not playing it.Originally posted by Love The ActionDon't remind me
In all fairness, I had wanted to wait on plays 2, 3 & 4 until this morning/afternoon to play but I knew I would be stuck in a work meeting to start my day and wouldn't be able to watch the lines . Therefore, I jumped on decent odds last night. It worked out well for that rockies under, but not so much for the reds under or padres under. Oh well....Comment -
anyone else think their is overeaction in the Padres ML line movement? it jumped like 30 cents... I know the rockies line up is shaken up but stillComment -
Boston will win by 10, every batted ball fair and foul so far has been 300+ feetComment -
The only variable in this game is Bedard.Originally posted by God1
Boston will score and score in bunches. That much is a given.Comment -
Fly ball pitcher in for a hell of a rideOriginally posted by God1
Comment -
I might hammer the Yankees live.
Hope they don't score here so that I can still get it at a decent price.Comment -
You do realize that whether or they score or not you are paying the same price unless of course you think pinnacle doesn't accurately price an in game runOriginally posted by No coincidencesComment -
Yes, but I'm also getting them at the same price after a 29-pitch first inning by Wade Davis.Originally posted by God1Comment -
Bedard isn't a variable, he's a very good pitcherOriginally posted by No coincidencesComment -
Anibal looks awful early LTA.Comment -
He's a china doll who's pitched once this month.Originally posted by God1
If Bedard's healthy, he's very good. That's hardly ever, though.Comment -
I never get Anibal right.
When I back him, he does this.
When I fade him, he's a monster.Comment -
Took the Yanks ML live at -155 for 5U after the first inning.Comment -
Huge deep breath for Vandenhurk with that potential grand slam out on Scutaro.Originally posted by God1Comment -
Anyone like the Mets/Cards over 8.5?Comment -
nc, the piniero game today and matusz yesterday were two rare examples of where I would judge whether my bet was good bet based on the result. Both bets were made based on material problems with the pitchers that doesn't necessarily show up in the numbers or shows up but is normally explained away by bad luck, had matusz not served up 90 fastballs in the zone his entire outing and actually got some strikeouts I would believe I made a bad bet. Same goes for piniero tonightComment -
wow -155 means they did not add anything for the pitch countOriginally posted by No coincidencesComment -
Agree.Originally posted by God1
I didn't play TOR/LAA, but if I did, there's no way I'd back Piniero. I've watched him pitch a few times recently, and he's not right.Comment -
It was like -164 at Pinny -- figured it'd be higher given how the first inning went.Originally posted by God1Comment -
Might roll the dice with the Cubs and the StL over at 8. Something's telling me to lay off the Cards ML, though.Comment -
what were the rays?Comment -
I didn't even look.Originally posted by God1Comment -
I have cards ML and RL pretty big, both better than the current line but I'm kind of convinced I'm about breaking evenOriginally posted by No coincidencesComment -
Bedard's probably going to go on the DL with a sprained vagina after this game.Comment -
the movement on the rockies and dodgers totals are astoundingComment -
Good luck. I just can't pull the trigger on Jackson.Originally posted by God1
First inning will tell a lot for both pitchers, who tend to struggle early if I remember correctly.Comment -
Agree? Disagree? Seems like the public likes the SD/COL over.Originally posted by God1Comment -
public loves the under. 46% on an under at coors field is quite rareOriginally posted by No coincidencesComment