John Morrison 2011 MLB

[clamchowder]

No problem, it took longer than I wanted it to. I can understand.

I've been following your picks for a while now so no excuses for me. I have no doubt that you'll come thru. Now, let's cash them in,

[dlunc3]

not a bad start... bases loaded no outs!

[dlunc3]

weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee grand slammmmmmmm

[Wallco99]

weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee grand slammmmmmmm

Hopefully by the end of this game people will be happy that it took me SOOOOOO LONG!

[GGPLAYER]

Off to a nice start

[dlunc3]

wouldnt mind a few more this inning!

[oklahoma]

checked up on this thread throughout the day and of course from 9pm to 10pm i totally blanked out. id try to get a live bet in but the odds will be disgusting the way this is going, already set up for another grand slam.

[dlunc3]

wanna see 10-0 first inning haha

[oklahoma]

yup live in bet runline is -6.5. damn...

[clamchowder]

Hopefully by the end of this game people will be happy that it took me SOOOOOO LONG!

Could you please do that for a few more games?

[Wallco99]

Wallco, or anyone else who can answer.

I was going back in the forum and I came across how you were supposed to bet teams that have bets for both the m/l and r/l. and apparently i have been betting this wrong the entire time haha. so here is what i have been doing thus far. for example, phillies last series i would have done something like

just an example and i know the phillies R/L were way lower than this

A bet
M/L bet $20 to win $15 m/l bet, you bet to win
R/L bet $15 to win $30 r/l bet, you bet to risk. what i was doing was takin my m/l "win" and making that my r/l "risk"


They lost, so move onto B bet
M/L bet $40 to win $35 (here i bet to win the total amount of losses for both M/L
and R/L, not just M/L and then +1 unit as i saw you
stated.)
R/L bet $35 to win $50 so here my M/L bet is making up both bets losses on A
bet and my R/L bet is making pure profit.

i'm pretty sure i was doing this wrong and SHOULD have been treating them as two separate chases. this is probably why i had so much juice on philly? but does that mean i benefited more then since i had a huge bet on philly M/L and use that win amount on the R/L which is where we make more money? so i think my error has done me well since thus far, every team has won both M/L and R/L bets. i was thinking about what if they win by 1, what would happen. that is how I figured out that I am probably betting this wrong. thanks guys

Treat them as seperate chases all together. Our total loss on a R/L chase should be 15 units, if we lose all four, playing to win 1 unit (plus M/L odds over 100), and all lines are +money, which for the most part, they are.
In this system, the most losses will result from M/L dog bets, second most - R/L bets, and least is M/L favorite bets. This is based on past results. You will lose some R/L bets, that will win on M/L, be careful. I didn't really follow what you were doing there, but treat them as seperate. If you think that this is confusing, then I can't wait to see when and if we get to the head-head (A) bet scenario, which is possible to have three bets on one game, both teams being bet on. But we'll discuss that when it arises. My opinion, play them all. But to each his own on that one. There are a lot of criteria which decide plays in this system, and if different criteria make two opposing teams a play, and all criteria have made for successful plays in the past, then which one do you choose. Answer: you don't choose, you play the sytem and bet all games that it lays out for you, even if two of the teams face off.

[Wallco99]

Could you please do that for a few more games?

Too many "ants in the pants" around here for that, but I would feel less pressured, that is for sure.

[h00dini]

Sh1t.........I took the cubs!!!! Didn't see the "official". My bad.

[epilog]

Sh1t.........I took the cubs!!!! Didn't see the "official". My bad.

Same here... Didn't know that the official could mean "choose the other team"...

[Wallco99]

Same here... Didn't know that the official could mean "choose the other team"...

Both of these points are CLEARLY stated in every single post.

[epilog]

Dammm, the Cubs are getting murdered out there! Somebody call a medic!!

[hagball52]

Not to change the subject or anything but there were 3 sweeps today. Mark 'em down on your JM calenders.
DET vs SEA (6/9/2011)
MIN vs TAM (7/4/2011)
KAN @ CLE (7/29/2011)

Wallco you betrayed me. I'm on the cubs. WTF are the D-backs drinkin' 2 nite?

[Wallco99]

Got here as fast as I could!

[hagball52]

Got here as fast as I could!

I know. Just bustin' yer chops !

[Franchise19]

Missed the ML play on Arizona but I did check the o/u earlier during the day and the line jumped from 8 to 10 in Vegas and such a huge jump doesn't happen that often so I took the over 10 and I guess it paid off this time, couldn't hit the ML but made it on the O!

[1gamer]

I don't think it to early to say...Wallco MLB PLU$$$ CASH IT!

Arizona slaps the Cubs around like a redheaded step child.

[knugen]

Damn, i missed the play, had to sleep , bit congrats!

[h00dini]

Both of these points are CLEARLY stated in every single post.

I know, I know. I'm not blaming you, I'm blaming myself.

[h00dini]

If it's true that history repeats itself, has anybody backtested "reversing" JM's picks. If they got swept by the same team they're playing, I wonder if they would at least lose one game again to that team? Just a thought.

[h00dini]

Great job by the way wallco99!!!!!!

[Wallco99]

I know. Just bustin' yer chops !

You didn't play the Cubs because you misinterpreted my posts, I hope. Were you playing them anyway as one of your picks?

[Wallco99]

I know, I know. I'm not blaming you, I'm blaming myself.

I know that, the response was for the second guy who posted.

[Wallco99]

hmm now its a scary bet..

You meant "scary good", right?

[dominate.]

this is absolutely amazing stuff

[ghislaine]

I thought I had a system with roulette using labby....started with 100 went up to 2.8 k then went down to 1.5 then pulled out. Anything I play after that is failure. You have no idea how many hands I played from $100 on the road to $2800 that made me firmly believe that my system couldn't lose. But it did. The house always has the advantage...

Doesn`t really belong here, buuut gotta agree, I too labbyed the roulette, made big winnings and then came back down. Quit at break even... But with JM and Wonder Wallcos systems we have a better percentage even on single games, and control
Keep cashing in, but I wouldn`t roulette again...

[RAK]

Got it. Thanks for keeping us updated Hagball.

Not to change the subject or anything but there were 3 sweeps today. Mark 'em down on your JM calenders.
DET vs SEA (6/9/2011)
MIN vs TAM (7/4/2011)
KAN @ CLE (7/29/2011)

Wallco you betrayed me. I'm on the cubs. WTF are the D-backs drinkin' 2 nite?

[million2one]

Damn Wallco, very impressive, switching from the Cubbies to the D-Backs like you did.
I wish I could see your thought process.
You are being very kind and have a lot of patience for some of these posters, you actually make it quite simple, not sure how people get so confused.

Keep on winning, my friend.

[gator46]

Damn Wallco, very impressive, switching from the Cubbies to the D-Backs like you did.
I wish I could see your thought process.
You are being very kind and have a lot of patience for some of these posters, you actually make it quite simple, not sure how people get so confused.

Keep on winning, my friend.

Second that. Keep up the good work.

[Betting Guru]

Wallco99 is doing an unbelievable job. keep it up man. thanks for posting and let's keep it going!

[GGPLAYER]

How are people not seeing the word Offical which is either there or not there?? Come'on.